iio: health: max30102: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through"
annotation at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458342 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458345 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo A. R. Silva 2018-08-15 11:23:49 -05:00 committed by Jonathan Cameron
parent a18c66c405
commit 9ffa68f654
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -282,9 +282,11 @@ static int max30102_read_measurement(struct max30102_data *data,
switch (measurements) {
case 3:
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(2);
case 2: /* fall-through */
/* fall through */
case 2:
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(1);
case 1: /* fall-through */
/* fall through */
case 1:
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(0);
break;
default: