iio: health: max30102: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through" annotation at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458342 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1458345 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a18c66c405
commit
9ffa68f654
|
@ -282,9 +282,11 @@ static int max30102_read_measurement(struct max30102_data *data,
|
|||
switch (measurements) {
|
||||
case 3:
|
||||
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(2);
|
||||
case 2: /* fall-through */
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 2:
|
||||
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(1);
|
||||
case 1: /* fall-through */
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
MAX30102_COPY_DATA(0);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue