[PATCH] zfcp: fix incorrect usage of erp_lock
================================= [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] --------------------------------- inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage. swapper/0 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes: (&adapter->erp_lock){+-..}, at: [<000000000026c7f8>] zfcp_erp_async_handler+0x3c/0x70 {hardirq-on-W} state was registered at: [<000000000005f33e>] __lock_acquire+0x30a/0xed0 [<00000000000604ae>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xc8 [<000000000035a7ae>] _write_lock+0x4e/0x68 [<000000000026d822>] zfcp_erp_adapter_strategy_generic+0x286/0xd94 [<000000000026fd72>] zfcp_erp_strategy_do_action+0x91e/0x1a94 [<0000000000271a3a>] zfcp_erp_thread+0x21a/0x1568 [<0000000000019096>] kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc [<0000000000019090>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc irq event stamp: 12078 hardirqs last enabled at (12077): [<0000000000019416>] cpu_idle+0x206/0x250 hardirqs last disabled at (12078): [<0000000000020458>] io_no_vtime+0xc/0x1c softirqs last enabled at (12072): [<0000000000040b62>] __do_softirq+0x13a/0x180 softirqs last disabled at (12059): [<000000000001fd58>] do_softirq+0xec/0xf0 other info that might help us debug this: no locks held by swapper/0. stack backtrace: 00000000012bb648 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 00000000012bb758 00000000012bb6c0 0000000000399122 0000000000399122 0000000000016b0a 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 00000000004660e8 0000000000000000 000000000000000d 00000000012bb6b8 00000000012bb730 0000000000368b90 0000000000016b0a 00000000012bb6b8 00000000012bb708 Call Trace: ([<0000000000016a26>] show_trace+0x76/0xdc) [<0000000000016b2c>] show_stack+0xa0/0xd0 [<0000000000016b8a>] dump_stack+0x2e/0x3c [<000000000005e3da>] print_usage_bug+0x27e/0x290 [<000000000005e934>] mark_lock+0x548/0x6c0 [<000000000005fb0c>] __lock_acquire+0xad8/0xed0 [<00000000000604ae>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xc8 [<000000000035a662>] _write_lock_irqsave+0x62/0x80 [<000000000026c7f8>] zfcp_erp_async_handler+0x3c/0x70 [<0000000000279178>] zfcp_fsf_req_dispatch+0xd8/0x1fa8 [<000000000027e538>] zfcp_fsf_req_complete+0x104/0xe4c [<0000000000274534>] zfcp_qdio_reqid_check+0xf4/0x178 [<000000000027469e>] zfcp_qdio_response_handler+0xe6/0x430 [<0000000000219dd4>] tiqdio_thinint_handler+0xd20/0x213c [<000000000020229a>] do_adapter_IO+0xb2/0xc0 [<0000000000206f32>] do_IRQ+0x136/0x16c [<0000000000020462>] io_no_vtime+0x16/0x1c [<0000000000019432>] cpu_idle+0x222/0x250 ([<0000000000019416>] cpu_idle+0x206/0x250) [<000000000001405a>] rest_init+0x5a/0x68 [<0000000000536998>] start_kernel+0x39c/0x3dc [<0000000000013046>] _stext+0x46/0x1000 Fix incorrect usage of erp_lock. Using the write_lock() variant is wrong, since this might lead to deadlocks. Acked-by: Andreas Herrmann <aherrman@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b6a7c79a52
commit
9f09c548e1
|
@ -2168,9 +2168,9 @@ zfcp_erp_adapter_strategy_open_fsf_xconfig(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action)
|
|||
atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_HOST_CON_INIT,
|
||||
&adapter->status);
|
||||
ZFCP_LOG_DEBUG("Doing exchange config data\n");
|
||||
write_lock(&adapter->erp_lock);
|
||||
write_lock_irq(&adapter->erp_lock);
|
||||
zfcp_erp_action_to_running(erp_action);
|
||||
write_unlock(&adapter->erp_lock);
|
||||
write_unlock_irq(&adapter->erp_lock);
|
||||
zfcp_erp_timeout_init(erp_action);
|
||||
if (zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data(erp_action)) {
|
||||
retval = ZFCP_ERP_FAILED;
|
||||
|
@ -2236,9 +2236,9 @@ zfcp_erp_adapter_strategy_open_fsf_xport(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action)
|
|||
adapter = erp_action->adapter;
|
||||
atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_ADAPTER_XPORT_OK, &adapter->status);
|
||||
|
||||
write_lock(&adapter->erp_lock);
|
||||
write_lock_irq(&adapter->erp_lock);
|
||||
zfcp_erp_action_to_running(erp_action);
|
||||
write_unlock(&adapter->erp_lock);
|
||||
write_unlock_irq(&adapter->erp_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
zfcp_erp_timeout_init(erp_action);
|
||||
ret = zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data(erp_action, adapter, NULL);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue