drm/i915: get/put runtime PM when we get/put a power domain
Any power domain will require the HW to be in PCI D0 state, so just do the simple thing. Dear maintainer: since intel_display_power_put() and intel_display_power_get() are almost identical, git-am has failed apply the patch on my local machine once: it added both chunks to put(), instead of one chunk to get() and another to put(). When you apply this patch to your tree, please check if it is correct. v2: - Add the warning above. v3: - Rebase. Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a8a8bd547e
commit
9e6ea71a59
|
@ -5577,6 +5577,8 @@ void intel_display_power_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
|||
struct i915_power_well *power_well;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
|
||||
|
||||
power_domains = &dev_priv->power_domains;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
|
||||
|
@ -5621,6 +5623,8 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct i915_power_domains *hsw_pwr;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue