btmrvl: avoid double-disable_irq() race
It's much the same as what we did for mwifiex in:
b9da4d2
mwifiex: avoid double-disable_irq() race
"We have a race where the wakeup IRQ might be in flight while we're
calling mwifiex_disable_wake() from resume(). This can leave us
disabling the IRQ twice.
Let's disable the IRQ and enable it in case if we have double-disabled
it."
Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9dcbc313cd
commit
9af02d86e1
|
@ -1682,8 +1682,12 @@ static int btmrvl_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
|
|||
/* Disable platform specific wakeup interrupt */
|
||||
if (card->plt_wake_cfg && card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt >= 0) {
|
||||
disable_irq_wake(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
|
||||
if (!card->plt_wake_cfg->wake_by_bt)
|
||||
disable_irq(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
|
||||
disable_irq(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
|
||||
if (card->plt_wake_cfg->wake_by_bt)
|
||||
/* Undo our disable, since interrupt handler already
|
||||
* did this.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
enable_irq(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue