x86/irq: Copy vectormask instead of an AND operation
In the case that the new vector mask is a subset of the existing mask there is no point to do a AND operation of currentmask & newmask. The result is newmask. So we can simply copy the new mask to the current mask and be done with it. Preparatory patch for further consolidation. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Tested-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com> Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.3+ Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151231160106.640253454@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3716fd27a6
commit
9ac15b7a8a
|
@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq, struct apic_chip_data *d,
|
|||
vector_cpumask);
|
||||
d->move_in_progress =
|
||||
cpumask_intersects(d->old_domain, cpu_online_mask);
|
||||
cpumask_and(d->domain, d->domain, vector_cpumask);
|
||||
cpumask_copy(d->domain, vector_cpumask);
|
||||
goto success;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue