hollalinux
/
linux-sg2042
mirror of https://github.com/sophgo/linux-riscv.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'for-4.14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq 

Pull workqueue updates from Tejun Heo:
 "Nothing major. I introduced a flag collsion bug during v4.13 cycle
  which is fixed in this pull request. Fortunately, the flag is for
  debugging / verification and the bug isn't critical"

* 'for-4.14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq:
  workqueue: Fix flag collision
  workqueue: Use TASK_IDLE
  workqueue: fix path to documentation
  workqueue: doc change for ST behavior on NUMA systems
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2017-09-06 21:59:31 -07:00
parent a7cbfd05f4 fbf1c41fc0
commit 9954d4892a
3 changed files with 11 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst
View File

@ -243,11 +243,15 @@ throttling the number of active work items, specifying '0' is
recommended.
Some users depend on the strict execution ordering of ST wq. The
combination of ``@max_active`` of 1 and ``WQ_UNBOUND`` is used to
achieve this behavior. Work items on such wq are always queued to the
unbound worker-pools and only one work item can be active at any given
combination of ``@max_active`` of 1 and ``WQ_UNBOUND`` used to
achieve this behavior. Work items on such wq were always queued to the
unbound worker-pools and only one work item could be active at any given
time thus achieving the same ordering property as ST wq.
In the current implementation the above configuration only guarantees
ST behavior within a given NUMA node. Instead alloc_ordered_queue should
be used to achieve system wide ST behavior.
Example Execution Scenarios
===========================

2
include/linux/workqueue.h
View File

@ -323,8 +323,8 @@ enum {
__WQ_DRAINING = 1 << 16, /* internal: workqueue is draining */
__WQ_ORDERED = 1 << 17, /* internal: workqueue is ordered */
__WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT = 1 << 18, /* internal: alloc_ordered_workqueue() */
__WQ_LEGACY = 1 << 18, /* internal: create*_workqueue() */
__WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT = 1 << 19, /* internal: alloc_ordered_workqueue() */
WQ_MAX_ACTIVE = 512, /* I like 512, better ideas? */
WQ_MAX_UNBOUND_PER_CPU = 4, /* 4 * #cpus for unbound wq */

6
kernel/workqueue.c
View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
* pools for workqueues which are not bound to any specific CPU - the
* number of these backing pools is dynamic.
*
* Please read Documentation/workqueue.txt for details.
* Please read Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst for details.
*/
#include <linux/export.h>
@ -2269,7 +2269,7 @@ sleep:
* event.
*/
worker_enter_idle(worker);
__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
__set_current_state(TASK_IDLE);
spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
schedule();
goto woke_up;
@ -2311,7 +2311,7 @@ static int rescuer_thread(void *__rescuer)
*/
rescuer->task->flags |= PF_WQ_WORKER;
repeat:
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
set_current_state(TASK_IDLE);
/*
* By the time the rescuer is requested to stop, the workqueue