cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_governor_lock
We used to drop policy->rwsem just before calling __cpufreq_governor() in some cases earlier and so it was possible that __cpufreq_governor() ran concurrently via separate threads for the same policy. In order to guarantee valid state transitions for governors, 'governor_enabled' was required to be protected using some locking and cpufreq_governor_lock was added for that. But now __cpufreq_governor() is always called under policy->rwsem, and 'governor_enabled' is protected against races even without cpufreq_governor_lock. Get rid of the extra lock now. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Tested-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ rjw : Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
49f18560f8
commit
99522fe678
|
@ -147,8 +147,6 @@ void cpufreq_update_util(u64 time, unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
|
|||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Flag to suspend/resume CPUFreq governors */
|
||||
static bool cpufreq_suspended;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2015,11 +2013,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
|||
|
||||
pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u, event %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu, event);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
|
||||
if ((policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
|
||||
|| (!policy->governor_enabled
|
||||
&& (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS || event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP))) {
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
|
||||
return -EBUSY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2028,8 +2024,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
|||
else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
|
||||
policy->governor_enabled = true;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = policy->governor->governor(policy, event);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
|
@ -2039,12 +2033,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
|||
policy->governor->initialized--;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* Restore original values */
|
||||
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
|
||||
if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP)
|
||||
policy->governor_enabled = true;
|
||||
else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
|
||||
policy->governor_enabled = false;
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT) && ret) ||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -232,7 +232,6 @@ static inline int delay_for_sampling_rate(unsigned int sampling_rate)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
extern struct mutex dbs_data_mutex;
|
||||
extern struct mutex cpufreq_governor_lock;
|
||||
void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
|
||||
int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event);
|
||||
void od_register_powersave_bias_handler(unsigned int (*f)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue