nvmem: qfprom: Improve the comment about regulator setting
In review feedback Joe Perches found the existing comment confusing. Let's use something based on the wording proposed by Joe. Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210611083348.20170-10-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1f7b4d8787
commit
989f77e3fd
|
@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Hardware requires a min voltage for fuse blowing; this may be
|
||||
* a rail shared do don't specify a max--regulator constraints
|
||||
* will handle.
|
||||
* Hardware requires a minimum voltage for fuse blowing.
|
||||
* This may be a shared rail so don't specify a maximum.
|
||||
* Regulator constraints will cap to the actual maximum.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = regulator_set_voltage(priv->vcc, qfprom_blow_uV, INT_MAX);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue