drm/ttm: Don't deadlock on recursive multi-bo reservations
Add an aid for the driver to detect deadlocks on multi-bo reservations Update documentation. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
68c4fa31aa
commit
96726fe50f
|
@ -223,8 +223,17 @@ int ttm_bo_reserve_locked(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
|
|||
/**
|
||||
* Deadlock avoidance for multi-bo reserving.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (use_sequence && bo->seq_valid &&
|
||||
(sequence - bo->val_seq < (1 << 31))) {
|
||||
if (use_sequence && bo->seq_valid) {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* We've already reserved this one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(sequence == bo->val_seq))
|
||||
return -EDEADLK;
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Already reserved by a thread that will not back
|
||||
* off for us. We need to back off.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(sequence - bo->val_seq < (1 << 31)))
|
||||
return -EAGAIN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -859,6 +859,9 @@ extern void ttm_bo_unmap_virtual(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
|
|||
* try again. (only if use_sequence == 1).
|
||||
* -ERESTARTSYS: A wait for the buffer to become unreserved was interrupted by
|
||||
* a signal. Release all buffer reservations and return to user-space.
|
||||
* -EBUSY: The function needed to sleep, but @no_wait was true
|
||||
* -EDEADLK: Bo already reserved using @sequence. This error code will only
|
||||
* be returned if @use_sequence is set to true.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
extern int ttm_bo_reserve(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
|
||||
bool interruptible,
|
||||
|
@ -868,11 +871,27 @@ extern int ttm_bo_reserve(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
|
|||
/**
|
||||
* ttm_bo_reserve_locked:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Similar to ttm_bo_reserve, but must be called with the glob::lru_lock
|
||||
* spinlock held, and will not remove reserved buffers from the lru lists.
|
||||
* @bo: A pointer to a struct ttm_buffer_object.
|
||||
* @interruptible: Sleep interruptible if waiting.
|
||||
* @no_wait: Don't sleep while trying to reserve, rather return -EBUSY.
|
||||
* @use_sequence: If @bo is already reserved, Only sleep waiting for
|
||||
* it to become unreserved if @sequence < (@bo)->sequence.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Must be called with struct ttm_bo_global::lru_lock held,
|
||||
* and will not remove reserved buffers from the lru lists.
|
||||
* The function may release the LRU spinlock if it needs to sleep.
|
||||
* Otherwise identical to ttm_bo_reserve.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns:
|
||||
* -EAGAIN: The reservation may cause a deadlock.
|
||||
* Release all buffer reservations, wait for @bo to become unreserved and
|
||||
* try again. (only if use_sequence == 1).
|
||||
* -ERESTARTSYS: A wait for the buffer to become unreserved was interrupted by
|
||||
* a signal. Release all buffer reservations and return to user-space.
|
||||
* -EBUSY: The function needed to sleep, but @no_wait was true
|
||||
* -EDEADLK: Bo already reserved using @sequence. This error code will only
|
||||
* be returned if @use_sequence is set to true.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
extern int ttm_bo_reserve_locked(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
|
||||
bool interruptible,
|
||||
bool no_wait, bool use_sequence,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue