ARM/LPC32xx: Use irq not hwirq for __irq_set_handler_locked()

irq_data->hwirq is not guaranteed to be the same as irq_data->irq. It
might be in that particular case, but it's wrong nevertheless.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner 2015-06-23 15:36:36 +02:00
parent bbc9d21fc0
commit 93b6eb77b4
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -283,25 +283,25 @@ static int lpc32xx_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
/* Rising edge sensitive */
__lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 1, 1);
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_edge_irq);
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_edge_irq);
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
/* Falling edge sensitive */
__lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 0, 1);
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_edge_irq);
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_edge_irq);
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
/* Low level sensitive */
__lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 0, 0);
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_level_irq);
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_level_irq);
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
/* High level sensitive */
__lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 1, 0);
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_level_irq);
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_level_irq);
break;
/* Other modes are not supported */