ARM/LPC32xx: Use irq not hwirq for __irq_set_handler_locked()
irq_data->hwirq is not guaranteed to be the same as irq_data->irq. It might be in that particular case, but it's wrong nevertheless. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bbc9d21fc0
commit
93b6eb77b4
|
@ -283,25 +283,25 @@ static int lpc32xx_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
|
|||
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
|
||||
/* Rising edge sensitive */
|
||||
__lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 1, 1);
|
||||
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_edge_irq);
|
||||
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_edge_irq);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
|
||||
/* Falling edge sensitive */
|
||||
__lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 0, 1);
|
||||
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_edge_irq);
|
||||
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_edge_irq);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
|
||||
/* Low level sensitive */
|
||||
__lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 0, 0);
|
||||
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_level_irq);
|
||||
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_level_irq);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
|
||||
/* High level sensitive */
|
||||
__lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 1, 0);
|
||||
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_level_irq);
|
||||
__irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_level_irq);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Other modes are not supported */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue