list debugging: use WARN() instead of BUG()
Arjan noted that the list_head debugging is BUG'ing when it detects corruption. By causing the box to panic immediately, we're possibly losing some bug reports. Changing this to a WARN() should mean we at the least start seeing reports collected at kerneloops.org Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d955c78ac4
commit
924d9addb9
|
@ -20,18 +20,14 @@ void __list_add(struct list_head *new,
|
|||
struct list_head *prev,
|
||||
struct list_head *next)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (unlikely(next->prev != prev)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
|
||||
"prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
|
||||
prev, next->prev, next);
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (unlikely(prev->next != next)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "list_add corruption. prev->next should be "
|
||||
"next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n",
|
||||
next, prev->next, prev);
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
WARN(next->prev != prev,
|
||||
"list_add corruption. next->prev should be "
|
||||
"prev (%p), but was %p. (next=%p).\n",
|
||||
prev, next->prev, next);
|
||||
WARN(prev->next != next,
|
||||
"list_add corruption. prev->next should be "
|
||||
"next (%p), but was %p. (prev=%p).\n",
|
||||
next, prev->next, prev);
|
||||
next->prev = new;
|
||||
new->next = next;
|
||||
new->prev = prev;
|
||||
|
@ -47,16 +43,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add);
|
|||
*/
|
||||
void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (unlikely(entry->prev->next != entry)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
|
||||
"but was %p\n", entry, entry->prev->next);
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (unlikely(entry->next->prev != entry)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, "
|
||||
"but was %p\n", entry, entry->next->prev);
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
WARN(entry->prev->next != entry,
|
||||
"list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
|
||||
"but was %p\n", entry, entry->prev->next);
|
||||
WARN(entry->next->prev != entry,
|
||||
"list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, "
|
||||
"but was %p\n", entry, entry->next->prev);
|
||||
__list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
|
||||
entry->next = LIST_POISON1;
|
||||
entry->prev = LIST_POISON2;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue