nvme-trace: fix spelling mistake "spcecific" -> "specific"
There are two spelling mistakes in trace_seq_printf messages, fix these. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7637de311b
commit
91f6d79853
|
@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static const char *nvme_trace_fabrics_common(struct trace_seq *p, u8 *spc)
|
|||
{
|
||||
const char *ret = trace_seq_buffer_ptr(p);
|
||||
|
||||
trace_seq_printf(p, "spcecific=%*ph", 24, spc);
|
||||
trace_seq_printf(p, "specific=%*ph", 24, spc);
|
||||
trace_seq_putc(p, 0);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static const char *nvmet_trace_fabrics_common(struct trace_seq *p, u8 *spc)
|
|||
{
|
||||
const char *ret = trace_seq_buffer_ptr(p);
|
||||
|
||||
trace_seq_printf(p, "spcecific=%*ph", 24, spc);
|
||||
trace_seq_printf(p, "specific=%*ph", 24, spc);
|
||||
trace_seq_putc(p, 0);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue