[XFRM]: Fix xfrm_state_num going negative.
Missing counter bump when hashing in a new ACQ xfrm_state. Now that we have two spots to do the hash grow check, break it out into a helper function. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4663afe2c8
commit
918049f013
|
@ -614,6 +614,14 @@ out:
|
|||
return x;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void xfrm_hash_grow_check(int have_hash_collision)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (have_hash_collision &&
|
||||
(xfrm_state_hmask + 1) < xfrm_state_hashmax &&
|
||||
xfrm_state_num > xfrm_state_hmask)
|
||||
schedule_work(&xfrm_hash_work);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __xfrm_state_insert(struct xfrm_state *x)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int h;
|
||||
|
@ -642,10 +650,7 @@ static void __xfrm_state_insert(struct xfrm_state *x)
|
|||
|
||||
xfrm_state_num++;
|
||||
|
||||
if (x->bydst.next != NULL &&
|
||||
(xfrm_state_hmask + 1) < xfrm_state_hashmax &&
|
||||
xfrm_state_num > xfrm_state_hmask)
|
||||
schedule_work(&xfrm_hash_work);
|
||||
xfrm_hash_grow_check(x->bydst.next != NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* xfrm_state_lock is held */
|
||||
|
@ -753,6 +758,10 @@ static struct xfrm_state *__find_acq_core(unsigned short family, u8 mode, u32 re
|
|||
h = xfrm_src_hash(daddr, saddr, family);
|
||||
hlist_add_head(&x->bysrc, xfrm_state_bysrc+h);
|
||||
wake_up(&km_waitq);
|
||||
|
||||
xfrm_state_num++;
|
||||
|
||||
xfrm_hash_grow_check(x->bydst.next != NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return x;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue