bpf: map_seq_next should always increase position index
If seq_file .next fuction does not change position index, read after some lseek can generate an unexpected output. See also: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283 v1 -> v2: removed missed increment in end of function Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/eca84fdd-c374-a154-d874-6c7b55fc3bc4@virtuozzo.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
07fdbee134
commit
90435a7891
|
@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static void *map_seq_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
|
|||
void *key = map_iter(m)->key;
|
||||
void *prev_key;
|
||||
|
||||
(*pos)++;
|
||||
if (map_iter(m)->done)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -208,8 +209,6 @@ static void *map_seq_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
|
|||
map_iter(m)->done = true;
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
++(*pos);
|
||||
return key;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue