scsi: bfa: bfa_fcpim: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that I replaced "Fall through !!!" with a "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114971 ("Missing break in switch") Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a8308767c1
commit
8fabc0eb9d
|
@ -2586,6 +2586,7 @@ bfa_ioim_send_ioreq(struct bfa_ioim_s *ioim)
|
|||
case FCP_IODIR_RW:
|
||||
bfa_stats(itnim, input_reqs);
|
||||
bfa_stats(itnim, output_reqs);
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
default:
|
||||
bfi_h2i_set(m->mh, BFI_MC_IOIM_IO, 0, bfa_fn_lpu(ioim->bfa));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2820,6 +2821,7 @@ bfa_ioim_isr(struct bfa_s *bfa, struct bfi_msg_s *m)
|
|||
|
||||
case BFI_IOIM_STS_TIMEDOUT:
|
||||
bfa_stats(ioim->itnim, iocomp_timedout);
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case BFI_IOIM_STS_ABORTED:
|
||||
rsp->io_status = BFI_IOIM_STS_ABORTED;
|
||||
bfa_stats(ioim->itnim, iocomp_aborted);
|
||||
|
@ -3215,9 +3217,7 @@ bfa_tskim_sm_cleanup_qfull(struct bfa_tskim_s *tskim,
|
|||
switch (event) {
|
||||
case BFA_TSKIM_SM_DONE:
|
||||
bfa_reqq_wcancel(&tskim->reqq_wait);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Fall through !!!
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case BFA_TSKIM_SM_QRESUME:
|
||||
bfa_sm_set_state(tskim, bfa_tskim_sm_cleanup);
|
||||
bfa_tskim_send_abort(tskim);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue