scsi: bfa: bfa_fcpim: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that I replaced "Fall through !!!" with a "fall through"
annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114971 ("Missing break in switch")
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo A. R. Silva 2018-11-26 11:52:21 -06:00
parent a8308767c1
commit 8fabc0eb9d
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -2586,6 +2586,7 @@ bfa_ioim_send_ioreq(struct bfa_ioim_s *ioim)
case FCP_IODIR_RW:
bfa_stats(itnim, input_reqs);
bfa_stats(itnim, output_reqs);
/* fall through */
default:
bfi_h2i_set(m->mh, BFI_MC_IOIM_IO, 0, bfa_fn_lpu(ioim->bfa));
}
@ -2820,6 +2821,7 @@ bfa_ioim_isr(struct bfa_s *bfa, struct bfi_msg_s *m)
case BFI_IOIM_STS_TIMEDOUT:
bfa_stats(ioim->itnim, iocomp_timedout);
/* fall through */
case BFI_IOIM_STS_ABORTED:
rsp->io_status = BFI_IOIM_STS_ABORTED;
bfa_stats(ioim->itnim, iocomp_aborted);
@ -3215,9 +3217,7 @@ bfa_tskim_sm_cleanup_qfull(struct bfa_tskim_s *tskim,
switch (event) {
case BFA_TSKIM_SM_DONE:
bfa_reqq_wcancel(&tskim->reqq_wait);
/*
* Fall through !!!
*/
/* fall through */
case BFA_TSKIM_SM_QRESUME:
bfa_sm_set_state(tskim, bfa_tskim_sm_cleanup);
bfa_tskim_send_abort(tskim);