vmscan: remove obsolete shrink_control comment
09f363c7
("vmscan: fix shrinker callback bug in fs/super.c") fixed a shrinker callback which was returning -1 when nr_to_scan is zero, which caused excessive slab scanning. But635697c6
("vmscan: fix initial shrinker size handling") fixed the problem, again so we can freely return -1 although nr_to_scan is zero. So let's revert09f363c7
because the comment added in09f363c7
made an unnecessary rule. Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fe03025db3
commit
8e125cd855
|
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int prune_super(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
|
|||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!grab_super_passive(sb))
|
||||
return !sc->nr_to_scan ? 0 : -1;
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
|
||||
fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ struct shrink_control {
|
|||
* 'nr_to_scan' entries and attempt to free them up. It should return
|
||||
* the number of objects which remain in the cache. If it returns -1, it means
|
||||
* it cannot do any scanning at this time (eg. there is a risk of deadlock).
|
||||
* The callback must not return -1 if nr_to_scan is zero.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The 'gfpmask' refers to the allocation we are currently trying to
|
||||
* fulfil.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue