pinctrl: move strict option to pinmux_ops
While the pinmux_ops are ideally just a vtable for pin mux calls, the "strict" setting belongs so intuitively with the pin multiplexing that we should move it here anyway. Putting it in the top pinctrl_desc makes no sense. Cc: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fa76a3db70
commit
8c4c201634
|
@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ static struct pinctrl_desc foo_desc = {
|
|||
.pins = foo_pins,
|
||||
.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(foo_pins),
|
||||
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
||||
.strict = true,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
int __init foo_probe(void)
|
||||
|
@ -715,6 +714,7 @@ static struct pinmux_ops foo_pmxops = {
|
|||
.get_function_name = foo_get_fname,
|
||||
.get_function_groups = foo_get_groups,
|
||||
.set_mux = foo_set_mux,
|
||||
.strict = true,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* Pinmux operations are handled by some pin controller */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -703,6 +703,7 @@ static struct pinmux_ops adi_pinmux_ops = {
|
|||
.get_function_name = adi_pinmux_get_func_name,
|
||||
.get_function_groups = adi_pinmux_get_groups,
|
||||
.gpio_request_enable = adi_pinmux_request_gpio,
|
||||
.strict = true,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -710,7 +711,6 @@ static struct pinctrl_desc adi_pinmux_desc = {
|
|||
.name = DRIVER_NAME,
|
||||
.pctlops = &adi_pctrl_ops,
|
||||
.pmxops = &adi_pinmux_ops,
|
||||
.strict = true,
|
||||
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int pin_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
|
|||
desc->name, desc->gpio_owner, owner);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (pctldev->desc->strict && desc->mux_usecount &&
|
||||
if (ops->strict && desc->mux_usecount &&
|
||||
strcmp(desc->mux_owner, owner)) {
|
||||
dev_err(pctldev->dev,
|
||||
"pin %s already requested by %s; cannot claim for %s\n",
|
||||
|
@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int pin_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
|
|||
desc->name, desc->mux_owner, owner);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (pctldev->desc->strict && desc->gpio_owner) {
|
||||
if (ops->strict && desc->gpio_owner) {
|
||||
dev_err(pctldev->dev,
|
||||
"pin %s already requested by %s; cannot claim for %s\n",
|
||||
desc->name, desc->gpio_owner, owner);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -114,8 +114,6 @@ struct pinctrl_ops {
|
|||
* of the pins field above
|
||||
* @pctlops: pin control operation vtable, to support global concepts like
|
||||
* grouping of pins, this is optional.
|
||||
* @strict: check both gpio_owner and mux_owner strictly before approving
|
||||
the pin request
|
||||
* @pmxops: pinmux operations vtable, if you support pinmuxing in your driver
|
||||
* @confops: pin config operations vtable, if you support pin configuration in
|
||||
* your driver
|
||||
|
@ -134,7 +132,6 @@ struct pinctrl_desc {
|
|||
const struct pinctrl_ops *pctlops;
|
||||
const struct pinmux_ops *pmxops;
|
||||
const struct pinconf_ops *confops;
|
||||
bool strict;
|
||||
struct module *owner;
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PINCONF
|
||||
unsigned int num_custom_params;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ struct pinctrl_dev;
|
|||
* depending on whether the GPIO is configured as input or output,
|
||||
* a direction selector function may be implemented as a backing
|
||||
* to the GPIO controllers that need pin muxing.
|
||||
* @strict: do not allow simultaneous use of the same pin for GPIO and another
|
||||
* function. Check both gpio_owner and mux_owner strictly before approving
|
||||
* the pin request.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct pinmux_ops {
|
||||
int (*request) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned offset);
|
||||
|
@ -79,6 +82,7 @@ struct pinmux_ops {
|
|||
struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range,
|
||||
unsigned offset,
|
||||
bool input);
|
||||
bool strict;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_PINMUX */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue