[media] zl10353: use div_u64 instead of do_div
Using div_u64() instead of do_div() makes the code slightly more readable by humans. [mchehab@osg.samsung.org: originally, this patch was proposed as a bug fix for a gcc bug. This was solved already, but it is still better to use div_u64, instead of do_div, so I'm applying it, removing the comments about the gcc bug] Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
68af062b5f
commit
8a73faab0a
|
@ -135,8 +135,7 @@ static void zl10353_calc_nominal_rate(struct dvb_frontend *fe,
|
|||
|
||||
value = (u64)10 * (1 << 23) / 7 * 125;
|
||||
value = (bw * value) + adc_clock / 2;
|
||||
do_div(value, adc_clock);
|
||||
*nominal_rate = value;
|
||||
*nominal_rate = div_u64(value, adc_clock);
|
||||
|
||||
dprintk("%s: bw %d, adc_clock %d => 0x%x\n",
|
||||
__func__, bw, adc_clock, *nominal_rate);
|
||||
|
@ -163,8 +162,7 @@ static void zl10353_calc_input_freq(struct dvb_frontend *fe,
|
|||
if (ife > adc_clock / 2)
|
||||
ife = adc_clock - ife;
|
||||
}
|
||||
value = (u64)65536 * ife + adc_clock / 2;
|
||||
do_div(value, adc_clock);
|
||||
value = div_u64((u64)65536 * ife + adc_clock / 2, adc_clock);
|
||||
*input_freq = -value;
|
||||
|
||||
dprintk("%s: if2 %d, ife %d, adc_clock %d => %d / 0x%x\n",
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue