selftests/x86: Style fixes for the 'unwind_vdso' test

Checkpatch is really quite bad for user code like this, but it
caught two legit style issues.

Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3335040bdd40d2bca4b1a28a3f8b165361c801b7.1444696194.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Andy Lutomirski 2015-10-12 17:32:12 -07:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 374a3a3916
commit 893a3ec27e
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ _Unwind_Reason_Code trace_fn(struct _Unwind_Context * ctx, void *opaque)
static void sigtrap(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ctx_void)
{
ucontext_t *ctx = (ucontext_t*)ctx_void;
ucontext_t *ctx = (ucontext_t *)ctx_void;
struct unwind_state state;
unsigned long ip = ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_EIP];
@ -192,7 +192,9 @@ int main()
* affected by libc/19006 (https://sourceware.org/PR19006).
*/
printf("[WARN]\tsyscall(2) didn't enter AT_SYSINFO\n");
} if (get_eflags() & X86_EFLAGS_TF) {
}
if (get_eflags() & X86_EFLAGS_TF) {
printf("[FAIL]\tTF is still set\n");
nerrs++;
}