powercap: intel_rapl: Use topology interface in rapl_add_package()
It's not a good idea to access phys_proc_id and cpu_die_id directly. Use topology_physical_package_id(cpu) and topology_die_id(cpu) instead. Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com> [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cca26b66ef
commit
88ffce9576
|
@ -1310,7 +1310,6 @@ struct rapl_package *rapl_add_package(int cpu, struct rapl_if_priv *priv)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int id = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
|
int id = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
|
||||||
struct rapl_package *rp;
|
struct rapl_package *rp;
|
||||||
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
|
|
||||||
int ret;
|
int ret;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!rapl_defaults)
|
if (!rapl_defaults)
|
||||||
|
@ -1327,10 +1326,11 @@ struct rapl_package *rapl_add_package(int cpu, struct rapl_if_priv *priv)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (topology_max_die_per_package() > 1)
|
if (topology_max_die_per_package() > 1)
|
||||||
snprintf(rp->name, PACKAGE_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH,
|
snprintf(rp->name, PACKAGE_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH,
|
||||||
"package-%d-die-%d", c->phys_proc_id, c->cpu_die_id);
|
"package-%d-die-%d",
|
||||||
|
topology_physical_package_id(cpu), topology_die_id(cpu));
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
snprintf(rp->name, PACKAGE_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH, "package-%d",
|
snprintf(rp->name, PACKAGE_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH, "package-%d",
|
||||||
c->phys_proc_id);
|
topology_physical_package_id(cpu));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* check if the package contains valid domains */
|
/* check if the package contains valid domains */
|
||||||
if (rapl_detect_domains(rp, cpu) || rapl_defaults->check_unit(rp, cpu)) {
|
if (rapl_detect_domains(rp, cpu) || rapl_defaults->check_unit(rp, cpu)) {
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue