net: Add part of TCP counts explanations in snmp_counters.rst
Add explanations of some generic TCP counters, fast open related counters and TCP abort related counters and several examples. Signed-off-by: yupeng <yupeng0921@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
17bf1693a6
commit
80cc49507b
|
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ multicast packets, and would always be updated together with
|
|||
IpExtOutOctets.
|
||||
|
||||
* IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets
|
||||
They are linux kernel extensions, no RFC definitions. Please note,
|
||||
They are Linux kernel extensions, no RFC definitions. Please note,
|
||||
RFC1213 indeed defines ifInOctets and ifOutOctets, but they
|
||||
are different things. The ifInOctets and ifOutOctets include the MAC
|
||||
layer header size but IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets don't, they
|
||||
|
@ -174,6 +174,163 @@ IcmpMsgOutType[N]. If the errors occur in both step (2) and step (4),
|
|||
IcmpInMsgs should be less than the sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] plus
|
||||
IcmpInErrors.
|
||||
|
||||
General TCP counters
|
||||
==================
|
||||
* TcpInSegs
|
||||
Defined in `RFC1213 tcpInSegs`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. _RFC1213 tcpInSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48
|
||||
|
||||
The number of packets received by the TCP layer. As mentioned in
|
||||
RFC1213, it includes the packets received in error, such as checksum
|
||||
error, invalid TCP header and so on. Only one error won't be included:
|
||||
if the layer 2 destination address is not the NIC's layer 2
|
||||
address. It might happen if the packet is a multicast or broadcast
|
||||
packet, or the NIC is in promiscuous mode. In these situations, the
|
||||
packets would be delivered to the TCP layer, but the TCP layer will discard
|
||||
these packets before increasing TcpInSegs. The TcpInSegs counter
|
||||
isn't aware of GRO. So if two packets are merged by GRO, the TcpInSegs
|
||||
counter would only increase 1.
|
||||
|
||||
* TcpOutSegs
|
||||
Defined in `RFC1213 tcpOutSegs`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. _RFC1213 tcpOutSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48
|
||||
|
||||
The number of packets sent by the TCP layer. As mentioned in RFC1213,
|
||||
it excludes the retransmitted packets. But it includes the SYN, ACK
|
||||
and RST packets. Doesn't like TcpInSegs, the TcpOutSegs is aware of
|
||||
GSO, so if a packet would be split to 2 by GSO, TcpOutSegs will
|
||||
increase 2.
|
||||
|
||||
* TcpActiveOpens
|
||||
Defined in `RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. _RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47
|
||||
|
||||
It means the TCP layer sends a SYN, and come into the SYN-SENT
|
||||
state. Every time TcpActiveOpens increases 1, TcpOutSegs should always
|
||||
increase 1.
|
||||
|
||||
* TcpPassiveOpens
|
||||
Defined in `RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens`_
|
||||
|
||||
.. _RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47
|
||||
|
||||
It means the TCP layer receives a SYN, replies a SYN+ACK, come into
|
||||
the SYN-RCVD state.
|
||||
|
||||
TCP Fast Open
|
||||
============
|
||||
When kernel receives a TCP packet, it has two paths to handler the
|
||||
packet, one is fast path, another is slow path. The comment in kernel
|
||||
code provides a good explanation of them, I pasted them below::
|
||||
|
||||
It is split into a fast path and a slow path. The fast path is
|
||||
disabled when:
|
||||
|
||||
- A zero window was announced from us
|
||||
- zero window probing
|
||||
is only handled properly on the slow path.
|
||||
- Out of order segments arrived.
|
||||
- Urgent data is expected.
|
||||
- There is no buffer space left
|
||||
- Unexpected TCP flags/window values/header lengths are received
|
||||
(detected by checking the TCP header against pred_flags)
|
||||
- Data is sent in both directions. The fast path only supports pure senders
|
||||
or pure receivers (this means either the sequence number or the ack
|
||||
value must stay constant)
|
||||
- Unexpected TCP option.
|
||||
|
||||
Kernel will try to use fast path unless any of the above conditions
|
||||
are satisfied. If the packets are out of order, kernel will handle
|
||||
them in slow path, which means the performance might be not very
|
||||
good. Kernel would also come into slow path if the "Delayed ack" is
|
||||
used, because when using "Delayed ack", the data is sent in both
|
||||
directions. When the TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will
|
||||
try to enable fast path immediately when the connection comes into the
|
||||
established state, but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel
|
||||
will disable the fast path at first, and try to enable it after kernel
|
||||
receives packets.
|
||||
|
||||
* TcpExtTCPPureAcks and TcpExtTCPHPAcks
|
||||
If a packet set ACK flag and has no data, it is a pure ACK packet, if
|
||||
kernel handles it in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPAcks will increase 1,
|
||||
if kernel handles it in the slow path, TcpExtTCPPureAcks will
|
||||
increase 1.
|
||||
|
||||
* TcpExtTCPHPHits
|
||||
If a TCP packet has data (which means it is not a pure ACK packet),
|
||||
and this packet is handled in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPHits will
|
||||
increase 1.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
TCP abort
|
||||
========
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* TcpExtTCPAbortOnData
|
||||
It means TCP layer has data in flight, but need to close the
|
||||
connection. So TCP layer sends a RST to the other side, indicate the
|
||||
connection is not closed very graceful. An easy way to increase this
|
||||
counter is using the SO_LINGER option. Please refer to the SO_LINGER
|
||||
section of the `socket man page`_:
|
||||
|
||||
.. _socket man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/socket.7.html
|
||||
|
||||
By default, when an application closes a connection, the close function
|
||||
will return immediately and kernel will try to send the in-flight data
|
||||
async. If you use the SO_LINGER option, set l_onoff to 1, and l_linger
|
||||
to a positive number, the close function won't return immediately, but
|
||||
wait for the in-flight data are acked by the other side, the max wait
|
||||
time is l_linger seconds. If set l_onoff to 1 and set l_linger to 0,
|
||||
when the application closes a connection, kernel will send a RST
|
||||
immediately and increase the TcpExtTCPAbortOnData counter.
|
||||
|
||||
* TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose
|
||||
This counter means the application has unread data in the TCP layer when
|
||||
the application wants to close the TCP connection. In such a situation,
|
||||
kernel will send a RST to the other side of the TCP connection.
|
||||
|
||||
* TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory
|
||||
When an application closes a TCP connection, kernel still need to track
|
||||
the connection, let it complete the TCP disconnect process. E.g. an
|
||||
app calls the close method of a socket, kernel sends fin to the other
|
||||
side of the connection, then the app has no relationship with the
|
||||
socket any more, but kernel need to keep the socket, this socket
|
||||
becomes an orphan socket, kernel waits for the reply of the other side,
|
||||
and would come to the TIME_WAIT state finally. When kernel has no
|
||||
enough memory to keep the orphan socket, kernel would send an RST to
|
||||
the other side, and delete the socket, in such situation, kernel will
|
||||
increase 1 to the TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory. Two conditions would trigger
|
||||
TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory:
|
||||
|
||||
1. the memory used by the TCP protocol is higher than the third value of
|
||||
the tcp_mem. Please refer the tcp_mem section in the `TCP man page`_:
|
||||
|
||||
.. _TCP man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/tcp.7.html
|
||||
|
||||
2. the orphan socket count is higher than net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout
|
||||
This counter will increase when any of the TCP timers expire. In such
|
||||
situation, kernel won't send RST, just give up the connection.
|
||||
|
||||
* TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger
|
||||
When a TCP connection comes into FIN_WAIT_2 state, instead of waiting
|
||||
for the fin packet from the other side, kernel could send a RST and
|
||||
delete the socket immediately. This is not the default behavior of
|
||||
Linux kernel TCP stack. By configuring the TCP_LINGER2 socket option,
|
||||
you could let kernel follow this behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
* TcpExtTCPAbortFailed
|
||||
The kernel TCP layer will send RST if the `RFC2525 2.17 section`_ is
|
||||
satisfied. If an internal error occurs during this process,
|
||||
TcpExtTCPAbortFailed will be increased.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _RFC2525 2.17 section: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2525#page-50
|
||||
|
||||
examples
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -220,3 +377,369 @@ and its corresponding Echo Reply packet are constructed by:
|
|||
* 48 bytes data (default value of the ping command)
|
||||
|
||||
So the IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets are 20+16+48=84.
|
||||
|
||||
tcp 3-way handshake
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
On server side, we run::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lknv 0.0.0.0 9000
|
||||
Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000)
|
||||
|
||||
On client side, we run::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -nv 192.168.122.251 9000
|
||||
Connection to 192.168.122.251 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
|
||||
|
||||
The server listened on tcp 9000 port, the client connected to it, they
|
||||
completed the 3-way handshake.
|
||||
|
||||
On server side, we can find below nstat output::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp
|
||||
TcpPassiveOpens 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpInSegs 2 0.0
|
||||
TcpOutSegs 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpExtTCPPureAcks 1 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
On client side, we can find below nstat output::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp
|
||||
TcpActiveOpens 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpInSegs 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpOutSegs 2 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
When the server received the first SYN, it replied a SYN+ACK, and came into
|
||||
SYN-RCVD state, so TcpPassiveOpens increased 1. The server received
|
||||
SYN, sent SYN+ACK, received ACK, so server sent 1 packet, received 2
|
||||
packets, TcpInSegs increased 2, TcpOutSegs increased 1. The last ACK
|
||||
of the 3-way handshake is a pure ACK without data, so
|
||||
TcpExtTCPPureAcks increased 1.
|
||||
|
||||
When the client sent SYN, the client came into the SYN-SENT state, so
|
||||
TcpActiveOpens increased 1, the client sent SYN, received SYN+ACK, sent
|
||||
ACK, so client sent 2 packets, received 1 packet, TcpInSegs increased
|
||||
1, TcpOutSegs increased 2.
|
||||
|
||||
TCP normal traffic
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
Run nc on server::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 0.0.0.0 9000
|
||||
Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000)
|
||||
|
||||
Run nc on client::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000
|
||||
Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
|
||||
|
||||
Input a string in the nc client ('hello' in our example)::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000
|
||||
Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
|
||||
hello
|
||||
|
||||
The client side nstat output::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat
|
||||
#kernel
|
||||
IpInReceives 1 0.0
|
||||
IpInDelivers 1 0.0
|
||||
IpOutRequests 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpInSegs 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpOutSegs 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpExtTCPPureAcks 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent 1 0.0
|
||||
IpExtInOctets 52 0.0
|
||||
IpExtOutOctets 58 0.0
|
||||
IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
The server side nstat output::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat
|
||||
#kernel
|
||||
IpInReceives 1 0.0
|
||||
IpInDelivers 1 0.0
|
||||
IpOutRequests 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpInSegs 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpOutSegs 1 0.0
|
||||
IpExtInOctets 58 0.0
|
||||
IpExtOutOctets 52 0.0
|
||||
IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
Input a string in nc client side again ('world' in our exmaple)::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000
|
||||
Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded!
|
||||
hello
|
||||
world
|
||||
|
||||
Client side nstat output::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat
|
||||
#kernel
|
||||
IpInReceives 1 0.0
|
||||
IpInDelivers 1 0.0
|
||||
IpOutRequests 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpInSegs 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpOutSegs 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpExtTCPHPAcks 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent 1 0.0
|
||||
IpExtInOctets 52 0.0
|
||||
IpExtOutOctets 58 0.0
|
||||
IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Server side nstat output::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat
|
||||
#kernel
|
||||
IpInReceives 1 0.0
|
||||
IpInDelivers 1 0.0
|
||||
IpOutRequests 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpInSegs 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpOutSegs 1 0.0
|
||||
TcpExtTCPHPHits 1 0.0
|
||||
IpExtInOctets 58 0.0
|
||||
IpExtOutOctets 52 0.0
|
||||
IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
Compare the first client-side nstat and the second client-side nstat,
|
||||
we could find one difference: the first one had a 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks',
|
||||
but the second one had a 'TcpExtTCPHPAcks'. The first server-side
|
||||
nstat and the second server-side nstat had a difference too: the
|
||||
second server-side nstat had a TcpExtTCPHPHits, but the first
|
||||
server-side nstat didn't have it. The network traffic patterns were
|
||||
exactly the same: the client sent a packet to the server, the server
|
||||
replied an ACK. But kernel handled them in different ways. When the
|
||||
TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will try to enable fast
|
||||
path immediately when the connection comes into the established state,
|
||||
but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel will disable the
|
||||
fast path at first, and try to enable it after kerenl receives
|
||||
packets. We could use the 'ss' command to verify whether the window
|
||||
scale option is used. e.g. run below command on either server or
|
||||
client::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -o state established -i '( dport = :9000 or sport = :9000 )
|
||||
Netid Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
|
||||
tcp 0 0 192.168.122.250:40654 192.168.122.251:9000
|
||||
ts sack cubic wscale:7,7 rto:204 rtt:0.98/0.49 mss:1448 pmtu:1500 rcvmss:536 advmss:1448 cwnd:10 bytes_acked:1 segs_out:2 segs_in:1 send 118.2Mbps lastsnd:46572 lastrcv:46572 lastack:46572 pacing_rate 236.4Mbps rcv_space:29200 rcv_ssthresh:29200 minrtt:0.98
|
||||
|
||||
The 'wscale:7,7' means both server and client set the window scale
|
||||
option to 7. Now we could explain the nstat output in our test:
|
||||
|
||||
In the first nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet, server
|
||||
reply an ACK, when kernel handled this ACK, the fast path was not
|
||||
enabled, so the ACK was counted into 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks'.
|
||||
|
||||
In the second nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet again,
|
||||
and received another ACK from the server, in this time, the fast path is
|
||||
enabled, and the ACK was qualified for fast path, so it was handled by
|
||||
the fast path, so this ACK was counted into TcpExtTCPHPAcks.
|
||||
|
||||
In the first nstat output of server side, fast path was not enabled,
|
||||
so there was no 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'.
|
||||
|
||||
In the second nstat output of server side, the fast path was enabled,
|
||||
and the packet received from client qualified for fast path, so it
|
||||
was counted into 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'.
|
||||
|
||||
TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
On the server side, we run below python script::
|
||||
|
||||
import socket
|
||||
import time
|
||||
|
||||
port = 9000
|
||||
|
||||
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
|
||||
s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port))
|
||||
s.listen(1)
|
||||
sock, addr = s.accept()
|
||||
while True:
|
||||
time.sleep(9999999)
|
||||
|
||||
This python script listen on 9000 port, but doesn't read anything from
|
||||
the connection.
|
||||
|
||||
On the client side, we send the string "hello" by nc::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ echo "hello" | nc nstat-b 9000
|
||||
|
||||
Then, we come back to the server side, the server has received the "hello"
|
||||
packet, and the TCP layer has acked this packet, but the application didn't
|
||||
read it yet. We type Ctrl-C to terminate the server script. Then we
|
||||
could find TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose increased 1 on the server side::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i abort
|
||||
TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose 1 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
If we run tcpdump on the server side, we could find the server sent a
|
||||
RST after we type Ctrl-C.
|
||||
|
||||
TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------
|
||||
Below is an example which let the orphan socket count be higher than
|
||||
net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans.
|
||||
Change tcp_max_orphans to a smaller value on client::
|
||||
|
||||
sudo bash -c "echo 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans"
|
||||
|
||||
Client code (create 64 connection to server)::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_orphan.py
|
||||
import socket
|
||||
import time
|
||||
|
||||
server = 'nstat-b' # server address
|
||||
port = 9000
|
||||
|
||||
count = 64
|
||||
|
||||
connection_list = []
|
||||
|
||||
for i in range(64):
|
||||
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
|
||||
s.connect((server, port))
|
||||
connection_list.append(s)
|
||||
print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list))
|
||||
|
||||
while True:
|
||||
time.sleep(99999)
|
||||
|
||||
Server code (accept 64 connection from client)::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_orphan.py
|
||||
import socket
|
||||
import time
|
||||
|
||||
port = 9000
|
||||
count = 64
|
||||
|
||||
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
|
||||
s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port))
|
||||
s.listen(count)
|
||||
connection_list = []
|
||||
while True:
|
||||
sock, addr = s.accept()
|
||||
connection_list.append((sock, addr))
|
||||
print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list))
|
||||
|
||||
Run the python scripts on server and client.
|
||||
|
||||
On server::
|
||||
|
||||
python3 server_orphan.py
|
||||
|
||||
On client::
|
||||
|
||||
python3 client_orphan.py
|
||||
|
||||
Run iptables on server::
|
||||
|
||||
sudo iptables -A INPUT -i ens3 -p tcp --destination-port 9000 -j DROP
|
||||
|
||||
Type Ctrl-C on client, stop client_orphan.py.
|
||||
|
||||
Check TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory on client::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort
|
||||
TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory 54 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
Check orphane socket count on client::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -s
|
||||
Total: 131 (kernel 0)
|
||||
TCP: 14 (estab 1, closed 0, orphaned 10, synrecv 0, timewait 0/0), ports 0
|
||||
|
||||
Transport Total IP IPv6
|
||||
* 0 - -
|
||||
RAW 1 0 1
|
||||
UDP 1 1 0
|
||||
TCP 14 13 1
|
||||
INET 16 14 2
|
||||
FRAG 0 0 0
|
||||
|
||||
The explanation of the test: after run server_orphan.py and
|
||||
client_orphan.py, we set up 64 connections between server and
|
||||
client. Run the iptables command, the server will drop all packets from
|
||||
the client, type Ctrl-C on client_orphan.py, the system of the client
|
||||
would try to close these connections, and before they are closed
|
||||
gracefully, these connections became orphan sockets. As the iptables
|
||||
of the server blocked packets from the client, the server won't receive fin
|
||||
from the client, so all connection on clients would be stuck on FIN_WAIT_1
|
||||
stage, so they will keep as orphan sockets until timeout. We have echo
|
||||
10 to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans, so the client system would
|
||||
only keep 10 orphan sockets, for all other orphan sockets, the client
|
||||
system sent RST for them and delete them. We have 64 connections, so
|
||||
the 'ss -s' command shows the system has 10 orphan sockets, and the
|
||||
value of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory was 54.
|
||||
|
||||
An additional explanation about orphan socket count: You could find the
|
||||
exactly orphan socket count by the 'ss -s' command, but when kernel
|
||||
decide whither increases TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and sends RST, kernel
|
||||
doesn't always check the exactly orphan socket count. For increasing
|
||||
performance, kernel checks an approximate count firstly, if the
|
||||
approximate count is more than tcp_max_orphans, kernel checks the
|
||||
exact count again. So if the approximate count is less than
|
||||
tcp_max_orphans, but exactly count is more than tcp_max_orphans, you
|
||||
would find TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory is not increased at all. If
|
||||
tcp_max_orphans is large enough, it won't occur, but if you decrease
|
||||
tcp_max_orphans to a small value like our test, you might find this
|
||||
issue. So in our test, the client set up 64 connections although the
|
||||
tcp_max_orphans is 10. If the client only set up 11 connections, we
|
||||
can't find the change of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory.
|
||||
|
||||
Continue the previous test, we wait for several minutes. Because of the
|
||||
iptables on the server blocked the traffic, the server wouldn't receive
|
||||
fin, and all the client's orphan sockets would timeout on the
|
||||
FIN_WAIT_1 state finally. So we wait for a few minutes, we could find
|
||||
10 timeout on the client::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort
|
||||
TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout 10 0.0
|
||||
|
||||
TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
The server side code::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_linger.py
|
||||
import socket
|
||||
import time
|
||||
|
||||
port = 9000
|
||||
|
||||
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
|
||||
s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port))
|
||||
s.listen(1)
|
||||
sock, addr = s.accept()
|
||||
while True:
|
||||
time.sleep(9999999)
|
||||
|
||||
The client side code::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_linger.py
|
||||
import socket
|
||||
import struct
|
||||
|
||||
server = 'nstat-b' # server address
|
||||
port = 9000
|
||||
|
||||
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
|
||||
s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_LINGER, struct.pack('ii', 1, 10))
|
||||
s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_TCP, socket.TCP_LINGER2, struct.pack('i', -1))
|
||||
s.connect((server, port))
|
||||
s.close()
|
||||
|
||||
Run server_linger.py on server::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ python3 server_linger.py
|
||||
|
||||
Run client_linger.py on client::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ python3 client_linger.py
|
||||
|
||||
After run client_linger.py, check the output of nstat::
|
||||
|
||||
nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort
|
||||
TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger 1 0.0
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue