regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()
For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch warning. WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e77addc597
commit
80c48e72f8
|
@ -129,9 +129,9 @@ static int ux500_regulator_status_print(struct seq_file *s, void *p)
|
|||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
/* print dump header */
|
||||
err = seq_printf(s, "ux500-regulator status:\n");
|
||||
err = seq_puts(s, "ux500-regulator status:\n");
|
||||
if (err < 0)
|
||||
dev_err(dev, "seq_printf overflow\n");
|
||||
dev_err(dev, "seq_puts overflow\n");
|
||||
|
||||
err = seq_printf(s, "%31s : %8s : %8s\n", "current",
|
||||
"before", "after");
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue