e1000e: resolve checkpatch PREFER_PR_LEVEL warning
WARNING: Prefer netdev_info(netdev, ... then dev_info(dev, ... then pr_info(... to printk(KERN_INFO ... v2 - remove unnecessary "e1000e:" prefix as pointed out by Joe Perches since that produces a redundant "e1000e:" in the log message Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com> Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8e5ab42d7f
commit
7dbc1672f1
|
@ -4300,9 +4300,8 @@ static void e1000_print_link_info(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
|
|||
u32 ctrl = er32(CTRL);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Link status message must follow this format for user tools */
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
|
||||
adapter->netdev->name,
|
||||
adapter->link_speed,
|
||||
pr_info("%s NIC Link is Up %d Mbps %s Duplex, Flow Control: %s\n",
|
||||
adapter->netdev->name, adapter->link_speed,
|
||||
adapter->link_duplex == FULL_DUPLEX ? "Full" : "Half",
|
||||
(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_TFCE) && (ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx/Tx" :
|
||||
(ctrl & E1000_CTRL_RFCE) ? "Rx" :
|
||||
|
@ -4521,8 +4520,7 @@ static void e1000_watchdog_task(struct work_struct *work)
|
|||
adapter->link_speed = 0;
|
||||
adapter->link_duplex = 0;
|
||||
/* Link status message must follow this format */
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "e1000e: %s NIC Link is Down\n",
|
||||
adapter->netdev->name);
|
||||
pr_info("%s NIC Link is Down\n", adapter->netdev->name);
|
||||
netif_carrier_off(netdev);
|
||||
if (!test_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state))
|
||||
mod_timer(&adapter->phy_info_timer,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue