crypto: chacha-generic - fix use as arm64 no-NEON fallback
The arm64 implementations of ChaCha and XChaCha are failing the extra
crypto self-tests following my patches to test the !may_use_simd() code
paths, which previously were untested. The problem is as follows:
When !may_use_simd(), the arm64 NEON implementations fall back to the
generic implementation, which uses the skcipher_walk API to iterate
through the src/dst scatterlists. Due to how the skcipher_walk API
works, walk.stride is set from the skcipher_alg actually being used,
which in this case is the arm64 NEON algorithm. Thus walk.stride is
5*CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE, not CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE.
This unnecessarily large stride shouldn't cause an actual problem.
However, the generic implementation computes round_down(nbytes,
walk.stride). round_down() assumes the round amount is a power of 2,
which 5*CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE is not, so it gives the wrong result.
This causes the following case in skcipher_walk_done() to be hit,
causing a WARN() and failing the encryption operation:
if (WARN_ON(err)) {
/* unexpected case; didn't process all bytes */
err = -EINVAL;
goto finish;
}
Fix it by rounding down to CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE instead of walk.stride.
(Or we could replace round_down() with rounddown(), but that would add a
slow division operation every time, which I think we should avoid.)
Fixes: 2fe55987b2
("crypto: arm64/chacha - use combined SIMD/ALU routine for more speed")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.0+
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
62f95ae805
commit
7aceaaef04
|
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static int chacha_stream_xor(struct skcipher_request *req,
|
|||
unsigned int nbytes = walk.nbytes;
|
||||
|
||||
if (nbytes < walk.total)
|
||||
nbytes = round_down(nbytes, walk.stride);
|
||||
nbytes = round_down(nbytes, CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE);
|
||||
|
||||
chacha_docrypt(state, walk.dst.virt.addr, walk.src.virt.addr,
|
||||
nbytes, ctx->nrounds);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue