signal: do_signal_stop: Remove the unneeded task_clear_group_stop_pending()
PF_EXITING or TASK_STOPPED has already called task_participate_group_stop() and cleared its ->group_stop. No need to do task_clear_group_stop_pending() when we start the new group stop. Add a small comment to explain the !task_is_stopped() check. Note that this check is not exactly right and it can lead to unnecessary stop later if the thread is TASK_PTRACED. What we need is task_participated_in_group_stop(), this will be solved later. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1deac632fc
commit
780006eac2
|
@ -1866,7 +1866,8 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
|
|||
* still in effect and then receive a stop signal and
|
||||
* initiate another group stop. This deviates from the
|
||||
* usual behavior as two consecutive stop signals can't
|
||||
* cause two group stops when !ptraced.
|
||||
* cause two group stops when !ptraced. That is why we
|
||||
* also check !task_is_stopped(t) below.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The condition can be distinguished by testing whether
|
||||
* SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED is already set. Don't generate
|
||||
|
@ -1896,8 +1897,6 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
|
|||
t->group_stop |= signr | gstop;
|
||||
sig->group_stop_count++;
|
||||
signal_wake_up(t, 0);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
task_clear_group_stop_pending(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue