selftests/bpf: Fix array access with signed variable test
The test fails because of a recent fix to the verifier, even though this program is valid. In details what happens is: 7: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0) Load a 32-bit value, with signed bounds [S32_MIN, S32_MAX]. The bounds of the 64-bit value are [0, U32_MAX]... 8: (65) if r1 s> 0xffffffff goto pc+1 ... therefore this is always true (the operand is sign-extended). 10: (b4) w2 = 11 11: (6d) if r2 s> r1 goto pc+1 When true, the 64-bit bounds become [0, 10]. The 32-bit bounds are still [S32_MIN, 10]. 13: (64) w1 <<= 2 Because this is a 32-bit operation, the verifier propagates the new 32-bit bounds to the 64-bit ones, and the knowledge gained from insn 11 is lost. 14: (0f) r0 += r1 15: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +0) = 4 Then the verifier considers r0 unbounded here, rejecting the test. To make the test work, change insn 8 to check the sign of the 32-bit value. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
511a76bcb0
commit
77ce220c05
|
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
|
|||
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9),
|
||||
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff, 1),
|
||||
BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff, 1),
|
||||
BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
|
||||
BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, MAX_ENTRIES),
|
||||
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1),
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue