[ACPI] fix passive cooling regression
Return logic was inverted. Going for changing the return value to not return zero as it is makes more sense regarding the naming of the function (cpu_has_cpufreq()). http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410 Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b05948d9b7
commit
75b245b325
|
@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct cpufreq_policy policy;
|
||||
if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu))
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_increase(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue