hollalinux
/
linux-sg2042
mirror of https://github.com/sophgo/linux-riscv.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge tag 'drm-intel-fixes-2019-01-24' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel into drm-fixes 

drm/i915 fixes for v5.0-rc4:
- fix priority boost
- gvt: fix destroy of shadow batch and indirect ctx

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/87k1iu1a2e.fsf@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
Dave Airlie 2019-01-25 06:57:45 +10:00
parent edaf690170 b42606b039
commit 7325e4bd06
2 changed files with 10 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
View File

@ -332,6 +332,9 @@ static void release_shadow_wa_ctx(struct intel_shadow_wa_ctx *wa_ctx)
i915_gem_object_unpin_map(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj);
i915_gem_object_put(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj);
wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj = NULL;
wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.shadow_va = NULL;
}
static int set_context_ppgtt_from_shadow(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload,
@ -911,11 +914,6 @@ static void complete_current_workload(struct intel_gvt *gvt, int ring_id)
list_del_init(&workload->list);
if (!workload->status) {
release_shadow_batch_buffer(workload);
release_shadow_wa_ctx(&workload->wa_ctx);
}
if (workload->status || (vgpu->resetting_eng & ENGINE_MASK(ring_id))) {
/* if workload->status is not successful means HW GPU
* has occurred GPU hang or something wrong with i915/GVT,
@ -1283,6 +1281,9 @@ void intel_vgpu_destroy_workload(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
{
struct intel_vgpu_submission *s = &workload->vgpu->submission;
release_shadow_batch_buffer(workload);
release_shadow_wa_ctx(&workload->wa_ctx);
if (workload->shadow_mm)
intel_vgpu_mm_put(workload->shadow_mm);

4
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
View File

@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ static void __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
*/
if (!(prio & I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT)) {
prio |= I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT;
active->sched.attr.priority = prio;
list_move_tail(&active->sched.link,
i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio));
}
@ -645,6 +646,9 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
int i;
priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p, i) {
GEM_BUG_ON(last &&
need_preempt(engine, last, rq_prio(rq)));
/*
* Can we combine this request with the current port?
* It has to be the same context/ringbuffer and not