Apparmor: Use d_is_positive/negative() rather than testing dentry->d_inode
Use d_is_positive(dentry) or d_is_negative(dentry) rather than testing dentry->d_inode as the dentry may cover another layer that has an inode when the top layer doesn't or may hold a 0,0 chardev that's actually a whiteout. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7ac2856d99
commit
729b8a3dee
|
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int d_namespace_path(struct path *path, char *buf, int buflen,
|
|||
* security_path hooks as a deleted dentry except without an inode
|
||||
* allocated.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (d_unlinked(path->dentry) && path->dentry->d_inode &&
|
||||
if (d_unlinked(path->dentry) && d_is_positive(path->dentry) &&
|
||||
!(flags & PATH_MEDIATE_DELETED)) {
|
||||
error = -ENOENT;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue