Btrfs: fix tracking of orphan inode count

In inode.c:btrfs_orphan_add() if we failed to insert the orphan
item, we would return without decrementing the orphan count that
we just incremented before attempting the insertion, leaving the
orphan inode count wrong.

In inode.c:btrfs_orphan_del(), we were decrementing the inode
orphan count if the bit BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED was set,
which is logically wrong because it should be decremented if the
bit BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM was set - after all we increment
the count when we set the bit BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM elsewhere.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This commit is contained in:
Filipe David Borba Manana 2013-09-22 21:54:55 +01:00 committed by Chris Mason
parent fe09e16cc8
commit 703c88e035
1 changed files with 8 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -2969,6 +2969,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
if (insert >= 1) {
ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
if (ret) {
atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
if (reserve) {
clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,
&BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags);
@ -3018,14 +3019,16 @@ static int btrfs_orphan_del(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
release_rsv = 1;
spin_unlock(&root->orphan_lock);
if (trans && delete_item)
ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root, btrfs_ino(inode));
if (release_rsv) {
btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
if (delete_item) {
atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
if (trans)
ret = btrfs_del_orphan_item(trans, root,
btrfs_ino(inode));
}
if (release_rsv)
btrfs_orphan_release_metadata(inode);
return ret;
}