hollalinux
/
linux-sg2042
mirror of https://github.com/sophgo/linux-riscv.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip 

Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:
 "The main changes in the locking subsystem in this cycle were:

   - Add the Linux Kernel Memory Consistency Model (LKMM) subsystem,
     which is an an array of tools in tools/memory-model/ that formally
     describe the Linux memory coherency model (a.k.a.
     Documentation/memory-barriers.txt), and also produce 'litmus tests'
     in form of kernel code which can be directly executed and tested.

     Here's a high level background article about an earlier version of
     this work on LWN.net:

        https://lwn.net/Articles/718628/

     The design principles:

      "There is reason to believe that Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
       could use some help, and a major purpose of this patch is to
       provide that help in the form of a design-time tool that can
       produce all valid executions of a small fragment of concurrent
       Linux-kernel code, which is called a "litmus test". This tool's
       functionality is roughly similar to a full state-space search.
       Please note that this is a design-time tool, not useful for
       regression testing. However, we hope that the underlying
       Linux-kernel memory model will be incorporated into other tools
       capable of analyzing large bodies of code for regression-testing
       purposes."

     [...]

      "A second tool is klitmus7, which converts litmus tests to
       loadable kernel modules for direct testing. As with herd7, the
       klitmus7 code is freely available from

         http://diy.inria.fr/sources/index.html

       (and via "git" at https://github.com/herd/herdtools7)"

     [...]

     Credits go to:

      "This patch was the result of a most excellent collaboration
       founded by Jade Alglave and also including Alan Stern, Andrea
       Parri, and Luc Maranget."

     ... and to the gents listed in the MAINTAINERS entry:

        LINUX KERNEL MEMORY CONSISTENCY MODEL (LKMM)
        M:      Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
        M:      Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
        M:      Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
        M:      Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
        M:      Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
        M:      Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
        M:      David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
        M:      Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>
        M:      Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>
        M:      "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

     The LKMM project already found several bugs in Linux locking
     primitives and improved the understanding and the documentation of
     the Linux memory model all around.

   - Add KASAN instrumentation to atomic APIs (Dmitry Vyukov)

   - Add RWSEM API debugging and reorganize the lock debugging Kconfig
     (Waiman Long)

   - ... misc cleanups and other smaller changes"

* 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (31 commits)
  locking/Kconfig: Restructure the lock debugging menu
  locking/Kconfig: Add LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT to make it more readable
  locking/rwsem: Add DEBUG_RWSEMS to look for lock/unlock mismatches
  lockdep: Make the lock debug output more useful
  locking/rtmutex: Handle non enqueued waiters gracefully in remove_waiter()
  locking/atomic, asm-generic, x86: Add comments for atomic instrumentation
  locking/atomic, asm-generic: Add KASAN instrumentation to atomic operations
  locking/atomic/x86: Switch atomic.h to use atomic-instrumented.h
  locking/atomic, asm-generic: Add asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h
  locking/xchg/alpha: Remove superfluous memory barriers from the _local() variants
  tools/memory-model: Finish the removal of rb-dep, smp_read_barrier_depends(), and lockless_dereference()
  tools/memory-model: Add documentation of new litmus test
  tools/memory-model: Remove mention of docker/gentoo image
  locking/memory-barriers: De-emphasize smp_read_barrier_depends() some more
  locking/lockdep: Show unadorned pointers
  mutex: Drop linkage.h from mutex.h
  tools/memory-model: Remove rb-dep, smp_read_barrier_depends, and lockless_dereference
  tools/memory-model: Convert underscores to hyphens
  tools/memory-model: Add a S lock-based external-view litmus test
  tools/memory-model: Add required herd7 version to README file
  ...
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2018-04-02 10:27:16 -07:00
parent 8747a29173 19193bcad8
commit 701f3b3149
59 changed files with 5106 additions and 301 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

51
Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt
View File

@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ lock-class.
State
-----
The validator tracks lock-class usage history into 4n + 1 separate state bits:
The validator tracks lock-class usage history into 4 * nSTATEs + 1 separate
state bits:
- 'ever held in STATE context'
- 'ever held as readlock in STATE context'
@ -37,7 +38,6 @@ The validator tracks lock-class usage history into 4n + 1 separate state bits:
Where STATE can be either one of (kernel/locking/lockdep_states.h)
- hardirq
- softirq
- reclaim_fs
- 'ever used' [ == !unused ]
@ -169,6 +169,53 @@ Note: When changing code to use the _nested() primitives, be careful and
check really thoroughly that the hierarchy is correctly mapped; otherwise
you can get false positives or false negatives.
Annotations
-----------
Two constructs can be used to annotate and check where and if certain locks
must be held: lockdep_assert_held*(&lock) and lockdep_*pin_lock(&lock).
As the name suggests, lockdep_assert_held* family of macros assert that a
particular lock is held at a certain time (and generate a WARN() otherwise).
This annotation is largely used all over the kernel, e.g. kernel/sched/
core.c
void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
{
s64 delta;
lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
[...]
}
where holding rq->lock is required to safely update a rq's clock.
The other family of macros is lockdep_*pin_lock(), which is admittedly only
used for rq->lock ATM. Despite their limited adoption these annotations
generate a WARN() if the lock of interest is "accidentally" unlocked. This turns
out to be especially helpful to debug code with callbacks, where an upper
layer assumes a lock remains taken, but a lower layer thinks it can maybe drop
and reacquire the lock ("unwittingly" introducing races). lockdep_pin_lock()
returns a 'struct pin_cookie' that is then used by lockdep_unpin_lock() to check
that nobody tampered with the lock, e.g. kernel/sched/sched.h
static inline void rq_pin_lock(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
rf->cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock);
[...]
}
static inline void rq_unpin_lock(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
[...]
lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, rf->cookie);
}
While comments about locking requirements might provide useful information,
the runtime checks performed by annotations are invaluable when debugging
locking problems and they carry the same level of details when inspecting
code. Always prefer annotations when in doubt!
Proof of 100% correctness:
--------------------------

34
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
View File

@ -14,7 +14,11 @@ DISCLAIMER
This document is not a specification; it is intentionally (for the sake of
brevity) and unintentionally (due to being human) incomplete. This document is
meant as a guide to using the various memory barriers provided by Linux, but
in case of any doubt (and there are many) please ask.
in case of any doubt (and there are many) please ask. Some doubts may be
resolved by referring to the formal memory consistency model and related
documentation at tools/memory-model/. Nevertheless, even this memory
model should be viewed as the collective opinion of its maintainers rather
than as an infallible oracle.
To repeat, this document is not a specification of what Linux expects from
hardware.
@ -48,7 +52,7 @@ CONTENTS
- Varieties of memory barrier.
- What may not be assumed about memory barriers?
- Data dependency barriers.
- Data dependency barriers (historical).
- Control dependencies.
- SMP barrier pairing.
- Examples of memory barrier sequences.
@ -399,7 +403,7 @@ Memory barriers come in four basic varieties:
where two loads are performed such that the second depends on the result
of the first (eg: the first load retrieves the address to which the second
load will be directed), a data dependency barrier would be required to
make sure that the target of the second load is updated before the address
make sure that the target of the second load is updated after the address
obtained by the first load is accessed.
A data dependency barrier is a partial ordering on interdependent loads
@ -550,8 +554,15 @@ There are certain things that the Linux kernel memory barriers do not guarantee:
Documentation/DMA-API.txt
DATA DEPENDENCY BARRIERS
------------------------
DATA DEPENDENCY BARRIERS (HISTORICAL)
-------------------------------------
As of v4.15 of the Linux kernel, an smp_read_barrier_depends() was
added to READ_ONCE(), which means that about the only people who
need to pay attention to this section are those working on DEC Alpha
architecture-specific code and those working on READ_ONCE() itself.
For those who need it, and for those who are interested in the history,
here is the story of data-dependency barriers.
The usage requirements of data dependency barriers are a little subtle, and
it's not always obvious that they're needed. To illustrate, consider the
@ -2839,8 +2850,9 @@ as that committed on CPU 1.
To intervene, we need to interpolate a data dependency barrier or a read
barrier between the loads. This will force the cache to commit its coherency
queue before processing any further requests:
barrier between the loads (which as of v4.15 is supplied unconditionally
by the READ_ONCE() macro). This will force the cache to commit its
coherency queue before processing any further requests:
CPU 1 CPU 2 COMMENT
=============== =============== =======================================
@ -2869,8 +2881,8 @@ Other CPUs may also have split caches, but must coordinate between the various
cachelets for normal memory accesses. The semantics of the Alpha removes the
need for hardware coordination in the absence of memory barriers, which
permitted Alpha to sport higher CPU clock rates back in the day. However,
please note that smp_read_barrier_depends() should not be used except in
Alpha arch-specific code and within the READ_ONCE() macro.
please note that (again, as of v4.15) smp_read_barrier_depends() should not
be used except in Alpha arch-specific code and within the READ_ONCE() macro.
CACHE COHERENCY VS DMA
@ -3035,7 +3047,9 @@ the data dependency barrier really becomes necessary as this synchronises both
caches with the memory coherence system, thus making it seem like pointer
changes vs new data occur in the right order.
The Alpha defines the Linux kernel's memory barrier model.
The Alpha defines the Linux kernel's memory model, although as of v4.15
the Linux kernel's addition of smp_read_barrier_depends() to READ_ONCE()
greatly reduced Alpha's impact on the memory model.
See the subsection on "Cache Coherency" above.

18
MAINTAINERS
View File

@ -8162,6 +8162,24 @@ M: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
S: Maintained
F: drivers/misc/lkdtm*
LINUX KERNEL MEMORY CONSISTENCY MODEL (LKMM)
M: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
M: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
M: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
M: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
M: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
M: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
M: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
M: Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>
M: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>
M: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
R: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
S: Supported
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
F: tools/memory-model/
F: Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
LINUX SECURITY MODULE (LSM) FRAMEWORK
M: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
L: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org

20
arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
View File

@ -38,19 +38,31 @@
#define ____cmpxchg(type, args...) __cmpxchg ##type(args)
#include <asm/xchg.h>
/*
* The leading and the trailing memory barriers guarantee that these
* operations are fully ordered.
*/
#define xchg(ptr, x) \
({ \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) _x_ = (x); \
(__typeof__(*(ptr))) __xchg((ptr), (unsigned long)_x_, \
sizeof(*(ptr))); \
smp_mb(); \
__ret = (__typeof__(*(ptr))) \
__xchg((ptr), (unsigned long)_x_, sizeof(*(ptr))); \
smp_mb(); \
__ret; \
})
#define cmpxchg(ptr, o, n) \
({ \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) _o_ = (o); \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) _n_ = (n); \
(__typeof__(*(ptr))) __cmpxchg((ptr), (unsigned long)_o_, \
(unsigned long)_n_, sizeof(*(ptr)));\
smp_mb(); \
__ret = (__typeof__(*(ptr))) __cmpxchg((ptr), \
(unsigned long)_o_, (unsigned long)_n_, sizeof(*(ptr)));\
smp_mb(); \
__ret; \
})
#define cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \

27
arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h
View File

@ -12,10 +12,6 @@
* Atomic exchange.
* Since it can be used to implement critical sections
* it must clobber "memory" (also for interrupts in UP).
*
* The leading and the trailing memory barriers guarantee that these
* operations are fully ordered.
*
*/
static inline unsigned long
@ -23,7 +19,6 @@ ____xchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsigned long val)
{
unsigned long ret, tmp, addr64;
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__(
" andnot %4,7,%3\n"
" insbl %1,%4,%1\n"
@ -38,7 +33,6 @@ ____xchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsigned long val)
".previous"
: "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (val), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (addr64)
: "r" ((long)m), "1" (val) : "memory");
smp_mb();
return ret;
}
@ -48,7 +42,6 @@ ____xchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsigned long val)
{
unsigned long ret, tmp, addr64;
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__(
" andnot %4,7,%3\n"
" inswl %1,%4,%1\n"
@ -63,7 +56,6 @@ ____xchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsigned long val)
".previous"
: "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (val), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (addr64)
: "r" ((long)m), "1" (val) : "memory");
smp_mb();
return ret;
}
@ -73,7 +65,6 @@ ____xchg(_u32, volatile int *m, unsigned long val)
{
unsigned long dummy;
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__(
"1: ldl_l %0,%4\n"
" bis $31,%3,%1\n"
@ -84,7 +75,6 @@ ____xchg(_u32, volatile int *m, unsigned long val)
".previous"
: "=&r" (val), "=&r" (dummy), "=m" (*m)
: "rI" (val), "m" (*m) : "memory");
smp_mb();
return val;
}
@ -94,7 +84,6 @@ ____xchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsigned long val)
{
unsigned long dummy;
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__(
"1: ldq_l %0,%4\n"
" bis $31,%3,%1\n"
@ -105,7 +94,6 @@ ____xchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsigned long val)
".previous"
: "=&r" (val), "=&r" (dummy), "=m" (*m)
: "rI" (val), "m" (*m) : "memory");
smp_mb();
return val;
}
@ -135,13 +123,6 @@ ____xchg(, volatile void *ptr, unsigned long x, int size)
* Atomic compare and exchange. Compare OLD with MEM, if identical,
* store NEW in MEM. Return the initial value in MEM. Success is
* indicated by comparing RETURN with OLD.
*
* The leading and the trailing memory barriers guarantee that these
* operations are fully ordered.
*
* The trailing memory barrier is placed in SMP unconditionally, in
* order to guarantee that dependency ordering is preserved when a
* dependency is headed by an unsuccessful operation.
*/
static inline unsigned long
@ -149,7 +130,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsigned char old, unsigned char new)
{
unsigned long prev, tmp, cmp, addr64;
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__(
" andnot %5,7,%4\n"
" insbl %1,%5,%1\n"
@ -167,7 +147,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsigned char old, unsigned char new)
".previous"
: "=&r" (prev), "=&r" (new), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (cmp), "=&r" (addr64)
: "r" ((long)m), "Ir" (old), "1" (new) : "memory");
smp_mb();
return prev;
}
@ -177,7 +156,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsigned short old, unsigned short new)
{
unsigned long prev, tmp, cmp, addr64;
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__(
" andnot %5,7,%4\n"
" inswl %1,%5,%1\n"
@ -195,7 +173,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsigned short old, unsigned short new)
".previous"
: "=&r" (prev), "=&r" (new), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (cmp), "=&r" (addr64)
: "r" ((long)m), "Ir" (old), "1" (new) : "memory");
smp_mb();
return prev;
}
@ -205,7 +182,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u32, volatile int *m, int old, int new)
{
unsigned long prev, cmp;
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__(
"1: ldl_l %0,%5\n"
" cmpeq %0,%3,%1\n"
@ -219,7 +195,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u32, volatile int *m, int old, int new)
".previous"
: "=&r"(prev), "=&r"(cmp), "=m"(*m)
: "r"((long) old), "r"(new), "m"(*m) : "memory");
smp_mb();
return prev;
}
@ -229,7 +204,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
{
unsigned long prev, cmp;
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__(
"1: ldq_l %0,%5\n"
" cmpeq %0,%3,%1\n"
@ -243,7 +217,6 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
".previous"
: "=&r"(prev), "=&r"(cmp), "=m"(*m)
: "r"((long) old), "r"(new), "m"(*m) : "memory");
smp_mb();
return prev;
}

106
arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h
View File

@ -17,36 +17,40 @@
#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) }
/**
* atomic_read - read atomic variable
* arch_atomic_read - read atomic variable
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
*
* Atomically reads the value of @v.
*/
static __always_inline int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline int arch_atomic_read(const atomic_t *v)
{
/*
* Note for KASAN: we deliberately don't use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() here,
* it's non-inlined function that increases binary size and stack usage.
*/
return READ_ONCE((v)->counter);
}
/**
* atomic_set - set atomic variable
* arch_atomic_set - set atomic variable
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
* @i: required value
*
* Atomically sets the value of @v to @i.
*/
static __always_inline void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i)
static __always_inline void arch_atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i)
{
WRITE_ONCE(v->counter, i);
}
/**
* atomic_add - add integer to atomic variable
* arch_atomic_add - add integer to atomic variable
* @i: integer value to add
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
*
* Atomically adds @i to @v.
*/
static __always_inline void atomic_add(int i, atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline void arch_atomic_add(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addl %1,%0"
: "+m" (v->counter)
@ -54,13 +58,13 @@ static __always_inline void atomic_add(int i, atomic_t *v)
}
/**
* atomic_sub - subtract integer from atomic variable
* arch_atomic_sub - subtract integer from atomic variable
* @i: integer value to subtract
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
*
* Atomically subtracts @i from @v.
*/
static __always_inline void atomic_sub(int i, atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline void arch_atomic_sub(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subl %1,%0"
: "+m" (v->counter)
@ -68,7 +72,7 @@ static __always_inline void atomic_sub(int i, atomic_t *v)
}
/**
* atomic_sub_and_test - subtract value from variable and test result
* arch_atomic_sub_and_test - subtract value from variable and test result
* @i: integer value to subtract
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
*
@ -76,63 +80,63 @@ static __always_inline void atomic_sub(int i, atomic_t *v)
* true if the result is zero, or false for all
* other cases.
*/
static __always_inline bool atomic_sub_and_test(int i, atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline bool arch_atomic_sub_and_test(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
GEN_BINARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "subl", v->counter, "er", i, "%0", e);
}
/**
* atomic_inc - increment atomic variable
* arch_atomic_inc - increment atomic variable
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
*
* Atomically increments @v by 1.
*/
static __always_inline void atomic_inc(atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline void arch_atomic_inc(atomic_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "incl %0"
: "+m" (v->counter));
}
/**
* atomic_dec - decrement atomic variable
* arch_atomic_dec - decrement atomic variable
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
*
* Atomically decrements @v by 1.
*/
static __always_inline void atomic_dec(atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline void arch_atomic_dec(atomic_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "decl %0"
: "+m" (v->counter));
}
/**
* atomic_dec_and_test - decrement and test
* arch_atomic_dec_and_test - decrement and test
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
*
* Atomically decrements @v by 1 and
* returns true if the result is 0, or false for all other
* cases.
*/
static __always_inline bool atomic_dec_and_test(atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline bool arch_atomic_dec_and_test(atomic_t *v)
{
GEN_UNARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "decl", v->counter, "%0", e);
}
/**
* atomic_inc_and_test - increment and test
* arch_atomic_inc_and_test - increment and test
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
*
* Atomically increments @v by 1
* and returns true if the result is zero, or false for all
* other cases.
*/
static __always_inline bool atomic_inc_and_test(atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline bool arch_atomic_inc_and_test(atomic_t *v)
{
GEN_UNARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "incl", v->counter, "%0", e);
}
/**
* atomic_add_negative - add and test if negative
* arch_atomic_add_negative - add and test if negative
* @i: integer value to add
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
*
@ -140,65 +144,65 @@ static __always_inline bool atomic_inc_and_test(atomic_t *v)
* if the result is negative, or false when
* result is greater than or equal to zero.
*/
static __always_inline bool atomic_add_negative(int i, atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline bool arch_atomic_add_negative(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
GEN_BINARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "addl", v->counter, "er", i, "%0", s);
}
/**
* atomic_add_return - add integer and return
* arch_atomic_add_return - add integer and return
* @i: integer value to add
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
*
* Atomically adds @i to @v and returns @i + @v
*/
static __always_inline int atomic_add_return(int i, atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline int arch_atomic_add_return(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
return i + xadd(&v->counter, i);
}
/**
* atomic_sub_return - subtract integer and return
* arch_atomic_sub_return - subtract integer and return
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
* @i: integer value to subtract
*
* Atomically subtracts @i from @v and returns @v - @i
*/
static __always_inline int atomic_sub_return(int i, atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline int arch_atomic_sub_return(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
return atomic_add_return(-i, v);
return arch_atomic_add_return(-i, v);
}
#define atomic_inc_return(v) (atomic_add_return(1, v))
#define atomic_dec_return(v) (atomic_sub_return(1, v))
#define arch_atomic_inc_return(v) (arch_atomic_add_return(1, v))
#define arch_atomic_dec_return(v) (arch_atomic_sub_return(1, v))
static __always_inline int atomic_fetch_add(int i, atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline int arch_atomic_fetch_add(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
return xadd(&v->counter, i);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_fetch_sub(int i, atomic_t *v)
static __always_inline int arch_atomic_fetch_sub(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
return xadd(&v->counter, -i);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *v, int old, int new)
static __always_inline int arch_atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *v, int old, int new)
{
return cmpxchg(&v->counter, old, new);
return arch_cmpxchg(&v->counter, old, new);
}
#define atomic_try_cmpxchg atomic_try_cmpxchg
static __always_inline bool atomic_try_cmpxchg(atomic_t *v, int *old, int new)
#define arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg
static __always_inline bool arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg(atomic_t *v, int *old, int new)
{
return try_cmpxchg(&v->counter, old, new);
}
static inline int atomic_xchg(atomic_t *v, int new)
static inline int arch_atomic_xchg(atomic_t *v, int new)
{
return xchg(&v->counter, new);
}
static inline void atomic_and(int i, atomic_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic_and(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "andl %1,%0"
: "+m" (v->counter)
@ -206,16 +210,16 @@ static inline void atomic_and(int i, atomic_t *v)
: "memory");
}
static inline int atomic_fetch_and(int i, atomic_t *v)
static inline int arch_atomic_fetch_and(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
int val = atomic_read(v);
int val = arch_atomic_read(v);
do { } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val & i));
do { } while (!arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val & i));
return val;
}
static inline void atomic_or(int i, atomic_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic_or(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "orl %1,%0"
: "+m" (v->counter)
@ -223,16 +227,16 @@ static inline void atomic_or(int i, atomic_t *v)
: "memory");
}
static inline int atomic_fetch_or(int i, atomic_t *v)
static inline int arch_atomic_fetch_or(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
int val = atomic_read(v);
int val = arch_atomic_read(v);
do { } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val | i));
do { } while (!arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val | i));
return val;
}
static inline void atomic_xor(int i, atomic_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic_xor(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "xorl %1,%0"
: "+m" (v->counter)
@ -240,17 +244,17 @@ static inline void atomic_xor(int i, atomic_t *v)
: "memory");
}
static inline int atomic_fetch_xor(int i, atomic_t *v)
static inline int arch_atomic_fetch_xor(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
int val = atomic_read(v);
int val = arch_atomic_read(v);
do { } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val ^ i));
do { } while (!arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val ^ i));
return val;
}
/**
* __atomic_add_unless - add unless the number is already a given value
* __arch_atomic_add_unless - add unless the number is already a given value
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
* @a: the amount to add to v...
* @u: ...unless v is equal to u.
@ -258,14 +262,14 @@ static inline int atomic_fetch_xor(int i, atomic_t *v)
* Atomically adds @a to @v, so long as @v was not already @u.
* Returns the old value of @v.
*/
static __always_inline int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
static __always_inline int __arch_atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
{
int c = atomic_read(v);
int c = arch_atomic_read(v);
do {
if (unlikely(c == u))
break;
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, &c, c + a));
} while (!arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, &c, c + a));
return c;
}
@ -276,4 +280,6 @@ static __always_inline int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
# include <asm/atomic64_64.h>
#endif
#include <asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h>
#endif /* _ASM_X86_ATOMIC_H */

106
arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_32.h
View File

@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ ATOMIC64_DECL(add_unless);
#undef ATOMIC64_EXPORT
/**
* atomic64_cmpxchg - cmpxchg atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_cmpxchg - cmpxchg atomic64 variable
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
* @o: expected value
* @n: new value
@ -71,20 +71,21 @@ ATOMIC64_DECL(add_unless);
* the old value.
*/
static inline long long atomic64_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, long long o, long long n)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, long long o,
long long n)
{
return cmpxchg64(&v->counter, o, n);
return arch_cmpxchg64(&v->counter, o, n);
}
/**
* atomic64_xchg - xchg atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_xchg - xchg atomic64 variable
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
* @n: value to assign
*
* Atomically xchgs the value of @v to @n and returns
* the old value.
*/
static inline long long atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, long long n)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, long long n)
{
long long o;
unsigned high = (unsigned)(n >> 32);
@ -96,13 +97,13 @@ static inline long long atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, long long n)
}
/**
* atomic64_set - set atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_set - set atomic64 variable
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
* @i: value to assign
*
* Atomically sets the value of @v to @n.
*/
static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i)
static inline void arch_atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i)
{
unsigned high = (unsigned)(i >> 32);
unsigned low = (unsigned)i;
@ -112,12 +113,12 @@ static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i)
}
/**
* atomic64_read - read atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_read - read atomic64 variable
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically reads the value of @v and returns it.
*/
static inline long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
{
long long r;
alternative_atomic64(read, "=&A" (r), "c" (v) : "memory");
@ -125,13 +126,13 @@ static inline long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
}
/**
* atomic64_add_return - add and return
* arch_atomic64_add_return - add and return
* @i: integer value to add
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically adds @i to @v and returns @i + *@v
*/
static inline long long atomic64_add_return(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_add_return(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
alternative_atomic64(add_return,
ASM_OUTPUT2("+A" (i), "+c" (v)),
@ -142,7 +143,7 @@ static inline long long atomic64_add_return(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
/*
* Other variants with different arithmetic operators:
*/
static inline long long atomic64_sub_return(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_sub_return(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
alternative_atomic64(sub_return,
ASM_OUTPUT2("+A" (i), "+c" (v)),
@ -150,7 +151,7 @@ static inline long long atomic64_sub_return(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
return i;
}
static inline long long atomic64_inc_return(atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_inc_return(atomic64_t *v)
{
long long a;
alternative_atomic64(inc_return, "=&A" (a),
@ -158,7 +159,7 @@ static inline long long atomic64_inc_return(atomic64_t *v)
return a;
}
static inline long long atomic64_dec_return(atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_dec_return(atomic64_t *v)
{
long long a;
alternative_atomic64(dec_return, "=&A" (a),
@ -167,13 +168,13 @@ static inline long long atomic64_dec_return(atomic64_t *v)
}
/**
* atomic64_add - add integer to atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_add - add integer to atomic64 variable
* @i: integer value to add
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically adds @i to @v.
*/
static inline long long atomic64_add(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_add(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
__alternative_atomic64(add, add_return,
ASM_OUTPUT2("+A" (i), "+c" (v)),
@ -182,13 +183,13 @@ static inline long long atomic64_add(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
}
/**
* atomic64_sub - subtract the atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_sub - subtract the atomic64 variable
* @i: integer value to subtract
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically subtracts @i from @v.
*/
static inline long long atomic64_sub(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_sub(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
__alternative_atomic64(sub, sub_return,
ASM_OUTPUT2("+A" (i), "+c" (v)),
@ -197,7 +198,7 @@ static inline long long atomic64_sub(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
}
/**
* atomic64_sub_and_test - subtract value from variable and test result
* arch_atomic64_sub_and_test - subtract value from variable and test result
* @i: integer value to subtract
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
@ -205,46 +206,46 @@ static inline long long atomic64_sub(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
* true if the result is zero, or false for all
* other cases.
*/
static inline int atomic64_sub_and_test(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline int arch_atomic64_sub_and_test(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
return atomic64_sub_return(i, v) == 0;
return arch_atomic64_sub_return(i, v) == 0;
}
/**
* atomic64_inc - increment atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_inc - increment atomic64 variable
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically increments @v by 1.
*/
static inline void atomic64_inc(atomic64_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic64_inc(atomic64_t *v)
{
__alternative_atomic64(inc, inc_return, /* no output */,
"S" (v) : "memory", "eax", "ecx", "edx");
}
/**
* atomic64_dec - decrement atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_dec - decrement atomic64 variable
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically decrements @v by 1.
*/
static inline void atomic64_dec(atomic64_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic64_dec(atomic64_t *v)
{
__alternative_atomic64(dec, dec_return, /* no output */,
"S" (v) : "memory", "eax", "ecx", "edx");
}
/**
* atomic64_dec_and_test - decrement and test
* arch_atomic64_dec_and_test - decrement and test
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically decrements @v by 1 and
* returns true if the result is 0, or false for all other
* cases.
*/
static inline int atomic64_dec_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
static inline int arch_atomic64_dec_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
{
return atomic64_dec_return(v) == 0;
return arch_atomic64_dec_return(v) == 0;
}
/**
@ -255,13 +256,13 @@ static inline int atomic64_dec_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
* and returns true if the result is zero, or false for all
* other cases.
*/
static inline int atomic64_inc_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
static inline int arch_atomic64_inc_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
{
return atomic64_inc_return(v) == 0;
return arch_atomic64_inc_return(v) == 0;
}
/**
* atomic64_add_negative - add and test if negative
* arch_atomic64_add_negative - add and test if negative
* @i: integer value to add
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
@ -269,13 +270,13 @@ static inline int atomic64_inc_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
* if the result is negative, or false when
* result is greater than or equal to zero.
*/
static inline int atomic64_add_negative(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline int arch_atomic64_add_negative(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
return atomic64_add_return(i, v) < 0;
return arch_atomic64_add_return(i, v) < 0;
}
/**
* atomic64_add_unless - add unless the number is a given value
* arch_atomic64_add_unless - add unless the number is a given value
* @v: pointer of type atomic64_t
* @a: the amount to add to v...
* @u: ...unless v is equal to u.
@ -283,7 +284,8 @@ static inline int atomic64_add_negative(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
* Atomically adds @a to @v, so long as it was not @u.
* Returns non-zero if the add was done, zero otherwise.
*/
static inline int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long long a, long long u)
static inline int arch_atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long long a,
long long u)
{
unsigned low = (unsigned)u;
unsigned high = (unsigned)(u >> 32);
@ -294,7 +296,7 @@ static inline int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long long a, long long u)
}
static inline int atomic64_inc_not_zero(atomic64_t *v)
static inline int arch_atomic64_inc_not_zero(atomic64_t *v)
{
int r;
alternative_atomic64(inc_not_zero, "=&a" (r),
@ -302,7 +304,7 @@ static inline int atomic64_inc_not_zero(atomic64_t *v)
return r;
}
static inline long long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
{
long long r;
alternative_atomic64(dec_if_positive, "=&A" (r),
@ -313,70 +315,70 @@ static inline long long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
#undef alternative_atomic64
#undef __alternative_atomic64
static inline void atomic64_and(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic64_and(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
long long old, c = 0;
while ((old = atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c & i)) != c)
while ((old = arch_atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c & i)) != c)
c = old;
}
static inline long long atomic64_fetch_and(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_fetch_and(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
long long old, c = 0;
while ((old = atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c & i)) != c)
while ((old = arch_atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c & i)) != c)
c = old;
return old;
}
static inline void atomic64_or(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic64_or(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
long long old, c = 0;
while ((old = atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c | i)) != c)
while ((old = arch_atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c | i)) != c)
c = old;
}
static inline long long atomic64_fetch_or(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_fetch_or(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
long long old, c = 0;
while ((old = atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c | i)) != c)
while ((old = arch_atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c | i)) != c)
c = old;
return old;
}
static inline void atomic64_xor(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic64_xor(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
long long old, c = 0;
while ((old = atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c ^ i)) != c)
while ((old = arch_atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c ^ i)) != c)
c = old;
}
static inline long long atomic64_fetch_xor(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_fetch_xor(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
long long old, c = 0;
while ((old = atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c ^ i)) != c)
while ((old = arch_atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c ^ i)) != c)
c = old;
return old;
}
static inline long long atomic64_fetch_add(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long long arch_atomic64_fetch_add(long long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
long long old, c = 0;
while ((old = atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c + i)) != c)
while ((old = arch_atomic64_cmpxchg(v, c, c + i)) != c)
c = old;
return old;
}
#define atomic64_fetch_sub(i, v) atomic64_fetch_add(-(i), (v))
#define arch_atomic64_fetch_sub(i, v) arch_atomic64_fetch_add(-(i), (v))
#endif /* _ASM_X86_ATOMIC64_32_H */

108
arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h
View File

@ -11,37 +11,37 @@
#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) { (i) }
/**
* atomic64_read - read atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_read - read atomic64 variable
* @v: pointer of type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically reads the value of @v.
* Doesn't imply a read memory barrier.
*/
static inline long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
static inline long arch_atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
{
return READ_ONCE((v)->counter);
}
/**
* atomic64_set - set atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_set - set atomic64 variable
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
* @i: required value
*
* Atomically sets the value of @v to @i.
*/
static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long i)
static inline void arch_atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long i)
{
WRITE_ONCE(v->counter, i);
}
/**
* atomic64_add - add integer to atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_add - add integer to atomic64 variable
* @i: integer value to add
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically adds @i to @v.
*/
static __always_inline void atomic64_add(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static __always_inline void arch_atomic64_add(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addq %1,%0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
@ -49,13 +49,13 @@ static __always_inline void atomic64_add(long i, atomic64_t *v)
}
/**
* atomic64_sub - subtract the atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_sub - subtract the atomic64 variable
* @i: integer value to subtract
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically subtracts @i from @v.
*/
static inline void atomic64_sub(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic64_sub(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subq %1,%0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline void atomic64_sub(long i, atomic64_t *v)
}
/**
* atomic64_sub_and_test - subtract value from variable and test result
* arch_atomic64_sub_and_test - subtract value from variable and test result
* @i: integer value to subtract
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
@ -71,18 +71,18 @@ static inline void atomic64_sub(long i, atomic64_t *v)
* true if the result is zero, or false for all
* other cases.
*/
static inline bool atomic64_sub_and_test(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline bool arch_atomic64_sub_and_test(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
GEN_BINARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "subq", v->counter, "er", i, "%0", e);
}
/**
* atomic64_inc - increment atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_inc - increment atomic64 variable
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically increments @v by 1.
*/
static __always_inline void atomic64_inc(atomic64_t *v)
static __always_inline void arch_atomic64_inc(atomic64_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "incq %0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
@ -90,12 +90,12 @@ static __always_inline void atomic64_inc(atomic64_t *v)
}
/**
* atomic64_dec - decrement atomic64 variable
* arch_atomic64_dec - decrement atomic64 variable
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically decrements @v by 1.
*/
static __always_inline void atomic64_dec(atomic64_t *v)
static __always_inline void arch_atomic64_dec(atomic64_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "decq %0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
@ -103,33 +103,33 @@ static __always_inline void atomic64_dec(atomic64_t *v)
}
/**
* atomic64_dec_and_test - decrement and test
* arch_atomic64_dec_and_test - decrement and test
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically decrements @v by 1 and
* returns true if the result is 0, or false for all other
* cases.
*/
static inline bool atomic64_dec_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
static inline bool arch_atomic64_dec_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
{
GEN_UNARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "decq", v->counter, "%0", e);
}
/**
* atomic64_inc_and_test - increment and test
* arch_atomic64_inc_and_test - increment and test
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically increments @v by 1
* and returns true if the result is zero, or false for all
* other cases.
*/
static inline bool atomic64_inc_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
static inline bool arch_atomic64_inc_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
{
GEN_UNARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "incq", v->counter, "%0", e);
}
/**
* atomic64_add_negative - add and test if negative
* arch_atomic64_add_negative - add and test if negative
* @i: integer value to add
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
@ -137,59 +137,59 @@ static inline bool atomic64_inc_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
* if the result is negative, or false when
* result is greater than or equal to zero.
*/
static inline bool atomic64_add_negative(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline bool arch_atomic64_add_negative(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
GEN_BINARY_RMWcc(LOCK_PREFIX "addq", v->counter, "er", i, "%0", s);
}
/**
* atomic64_add_return - add and return
* arch_atomic64_add_return - add and return
* @i: integer value to add
* @v: pointer to type atomic64_t
*
* Atomically adds @i to @v and returns @i + @v
*/
static __always_inline long atomic64_add_return(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static __always_inline long arch_atomic64_add_return(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
return i + xadd(&v->counter, i);
}
static inline long atomic64_sub_return(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long arch_atomic64_sub_return(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
return atomic64_add_return(-i, v);
return arch_atomic64_add_return(-i, v);
}
static inline long atomic64_fetch_add(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long arch_atomic64_fetch_add(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
return xadd(&v->counter, i);
}
static inline long atomic64_fetch_sub(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long arch_atomic64_fetch_sub(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
return xadd(&v->counter, -i);
}
#define atomic64_inc_return(v) (atomic64_add_return(1, (v)))
#define atomic64_dec_return(v) (atomic64_sub_return(1, (v)))
#define arch_atomic64_inc_return(v) (arch_atomic64_add_return(1, (v)))
#define arch_atomic64_dec_return(v) (arch_atomic64_sub_return(1, (v)))
static inline long atomic64_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, long old, long new)
static inline long arch_atomic64_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, long old, long new)
{
return cmpxchg(&v->counter, old, new);
return arch_cmpxchg(&v->counter, old, new);
}
#define atomic64_try_cmpxchg atomic64_try_cmpxchg
static __always_inline bool atomic64_try_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, s64 *old, long new)
#define arch_atomic64_try_cmpxchg arch_atomic64_try_cmpxchg
static __always_inline bool arch_atomic64_try_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, s64 *old, long new)
{
return try_cmpxchg(&v->counter, old, new);
}
static inline long atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, long new)
static inline long arch_atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, long new)
{
return xchg(&v->counter, new);
}
/**
* atomic64_add_unless - add unless the number is a given value
* arch_atomic64_add_unless - add unless the number is a given value
* @v: pointer of type atomic64_t
* @a: the amount to add to v...
* @u: ...unless v is equal to u.
@ -197,37 +197,37 @@ static inline long atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, long new)
* Atomically adds @a to @v, so long as it was not @u.
* Returns the old value of @v.
*/
static inline bool atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long a, long u)
static inline bool arch_atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long a, long u)
{
s64 c = atomic64_read(v);
s64 c = arch_atomic64_read(v);
do {
if (unlikely(c == u))
return false;
} while (!atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, &c, c + a));
} while (!arch_atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, &c, c + a));
return true;
}
#define atomic64_inc_not_zero(v) atomic64_add_unless((v), 1, 0)
#define arch_atomic64_inc_not_zero(v) arch_atomic64_add_unless((v), 1, 0)
/*
* atomic64_dec_if_positive - decrement by 1 if old value positive
* arch_atomic64_dec_if_positive - decrement by 1 if old value positive
* @v: pointer of type atomic_t
*
* The function returns the old value of *v minus 1, even if
* the atomic variable, v, was not decremented.
*/
static inline long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
static inline long arch_atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
{
s64 dec, c = atomic64_read(v);
s64 dec, c = arch_atomic64_read(v);
do {
dec = c - 1;
if (unlikely(dec < 0))
break;
} while (!atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, &c, dec));
} while (!arch_atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, &c, dec));
return dec;
}
static inline void atomic64_and(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic64_and(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "andq %1,%0"
: "+m" (v->counter)
@ -235,16 +235,16 @@ static inline void atomic64_and(long i, atomic64_t *v)
: "memory");
}
static inline long atomic64_fetch_and(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long arch_atomic64_fetch_and(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
s64 val = atomic64_read(v);
s64 val = arch_atomic64_read(v);
do {
} while (!atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val & i));
} while (!arch_atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val & i));
return val;
}
static inline void atomic64_or(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic64_or(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "orq %1,%0"
: "+m" (v->counter)
@ -252,16 +252,16 @@ static inline void atomic64_or(long i, atomic64_t *v)
: "memory");
}
static inline long atomic64_fetch_or(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long arch_atomic64_fetch_or(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
s64 val = atomic64_read(v);
s64 val = arch_atomic64_read(v);
do {
} while (!atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val | i));
} while (!arch_atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val | i));
return val;
}
static inline void atomic64_xor(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline void arch_atomic64_xor(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "xorq %1,%0"
: "+m" (v->counter)
@ -269,12 +269,12 @@ static inline void atomic64_xor(long i, atomic64_t *v)
: "memory");
}
static inline long atomic64_fetch_xor(long i, atomic64_t *v)
static inline long arch_atomic64_fetch_xor(long i, atomic64_t *v)
{
s64 val = atomic64_read(v);
s64 val = arch_atomic64_read(v);
do {
} while (!atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val ^ i));
} while (!arch_atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val ^ i));
return val;
}

12
arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
View File

@ -145,13 +145,13 @@ extern void __add_wrong_size(void)
# include <asm/cmpxchg_64.h>
#endif
#define cmpxchg(ptr, old, new) \
#define arch_cmpxchg(ptr, old, new) \
__cmpxchg(ptr, old, new, sizeof(*(ptr)))
#define sync_cmpxchg(ptr, old, new) \
#define arch_sync_cmpxchg(ptr, old, new) \
__sync_cmpxchg(ptr, old, new, sizeof(*(ptr)))
#define cmpxchg_local(ptr, old, new) \
#define arch_cmpxchg_local(ptr, old, new) \
__cmpxchg_local(ptr, old, new, sizeof(*(ptr)))
@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ extern void __add_wrong_size(void)
#define __try_cmpxchg(ptr, pold, new, size) \
__raw_try_cmpxchg((ptr), (pold), (new), (size), LOCK_PREFIX)
#define try_cmpxchg(ptr, pold, new) \
#define try_cmpxchg(ptr, pold, new) \
__try_cmpxchg((ptr), (pold), (new), sizeof(*(ptr)))
/*
@ -250,10 +250,10 @@ extern void __add_wrong_size(void)
__ret; \
})
#define cmpxchg_double(p1, p2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
#define arch_cmpxchg_double(p1, p2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
__cmpxchg_double(LOCK_PREFIX, p1, p2, o1, o2, n1, n2)
#define cmpxchg_double_local(p1, p2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
#define arch_cmpxchg_double_local(p1, p2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
__cmpxchg_double(, p1, p2, o1, o2, n1, n2)
#endif /* ASM_X86_CMPXCHG_H */

8
arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h
View File

@ -36,10 +36,10 @@ static inline void set_64bit(volatile u64 *ptr, u64 value)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64
#define cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
#define arch_cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
((__typeof__(*(ptr)))__cmpxchg64((ptr), (unsigned long long)(o), \
(unsigned long long)(n)))
#define cmpxchg64_local(ptr, o, n) \
#define arch_cmpxchg64_local(ptr, o, n) \
((__typeof__(*(ptr)))__cmpxchg64_local((ptr), (unsigned long long)(o), \
(unsigned long long)(n)))
#endif
@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static inline u64 __cmpxchg64_local(volatile u64 *ptr, u64 old, u64 new)
* to simulate the cmpxchg8b on the 80386 and 80486 CPU.
*/
#define cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
#define arch_cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
({ \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __old = (o); \
@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static inline u64 __cmpxchg64_local(volatile u64 *ptr, u64 old, u64 new)
__ret; })
#define cmpxchg64_local(ptr, o, n) \
#define arch_cmpxchg64_local(ptr, o, n) \
({ \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __old = (o); \

4
arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_64.h
View File

@ -7,13 +7,13 @@ static inline void set_64bit(volatile u64 *ptr, u64 val)
*ptr = val;
}
#define cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
#define arch_cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
({ \
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*(ptr)) != 8); \
cmpxchg((ptr), (o), (n)); \
})
#define cmpxchg64_local(ptr, o, n) \
#define arch_cmpxchg64_local(ptr, o, n) \
({ \
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*(ptr)) != 8); \
cmpxchg_local((ptr), (o), (n)); \

476
include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
/*
* This file provides wrappers with KASAN instrumentation for atomic operations.
* To use this functionality an arch's atomic.h file needs to define all
* atomic operations with arch_ prefix (e.g. arch_atomic_read()) and include
* this file at the end. This file provides atomic_read() that forwards to
* arch_atomic_read() for actual atomic operation.
* Note: if an arch atomic operation is implemented by means of other atomic
* operations (e.g. atomic_read()/atomic_cmpxchg() loop), then it needs to use
* arch_ variants (i.e. arch_atomic_read()/arch_atomic_cmpxchg()) to avoid
* double instrumentation.
*/
#ifndef _LINUX_ATOMIC_INSTRUMENTED_H
#define _LINUX_ATOMIC_INSTRUMENTED_H
#include <linux/build_bug.h>
#include <linux/kasan-checks.h>
static __always_inline int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_read(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_read(v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_read(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_read(v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic_set(v, i);
}
static __always_inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, s64 i)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic64_set(v, i);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_xchg(atomic_t *v, int i)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_xchg(v, i);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, s64 i)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_xchg(v, i);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *v, int old, int new)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_cmpxchg(v, old, new);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, s64 old, s64 new)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_cmpxchg(v, old, new);
}
#ifdef arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg
#define atomic_try_cmpxchg atomic_try_cmpxchg
static __always_inline bool atomic_try_cmpxchg(atomic_t *v, int *old, int new)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
kasan_check_read(old, sizeof(*old));
return arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, old, new);
}
#endif
#ifdef arch_atomic64_try_cmpxchg
#define atomic64_try_cmpxchg atomic64_try_cmpxchg
static __always_inline bool atomic64_try_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, s64 *old, s64 new)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
kasan_check_read(old, sizeof(*old));
return arch_atomic64_try_cmpxchg(v, old, new);
}
#endif
static __always_inline int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return __arch_atomic_add_unless(v, a, u);
}
static __always_inline bool atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, s64 a, s64 u)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_add_unless(v, a, u);
}
static __always_inline void atomic_inc(atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic_inc(v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic64_inc(atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic64_inc(v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic_dec(atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic_dec(v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic64_dec(atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic64_dec(v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic_add(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic_add(i, v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic64_add(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic64_add(i, v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic_sub(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic_sub(i, v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic64_sub(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic64_sub(i, v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic_and(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic_and(i, v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic64_and(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic64_and(i, v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic_or(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic_or(i, v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic64_or(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic64_or(i, v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic_xor(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic_xor(i, v);
}
static __always_inline void atomic64_xor(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
arch_atomic64_xor(i, v);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_inc_return(atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_inc_return(v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_inc_return(atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_inc_return(v);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_dec_return(atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_dec_return(v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_dec_return(atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_dec_return(v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_inc_not_zero(atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_inc_not_zero(v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_dec_if_positive(v);
}
static __always_inline bool atomic_dec_and_test(atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_dec_and_test(v);
}
static __always_inline bool atomic64_dec_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_dec_and_test(v);
}
static __always_inline bool atomic_inc_and_test(atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_inc_and_test(v);
}
static __always_inline bool atomic64_inc_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_inc_and_test(v);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_add_return(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_add_return(i, v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_add_return(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_add_return(i, v);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_sub_return(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_sub_return(i, v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_sub_return(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_sub_return(i, v);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_fetch_add(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_fetch_add(i, v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_fetch_add(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_fetch_add(i, v);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_fetch_sub(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_fetch_sub(i, v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_fetch_sub(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_fetch_sub(i, v);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_fetch_and(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_fetch_and(i, v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_fetch_and(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_fetch_and(i, v);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_fetch_or(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_fetch_or(i, v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_fetch_or(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_fetch_or(i, v);
}
static __always_inline int atomic_fetch_xor(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_fetch_xor(i, v);
}
static __always_inline s64 atomic64_fetch_xor(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_fetch_xor(i, v);
}
static __always_inline bool atomic_sub_and_test(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_sub_and_test(i, v);
}
static __always_inline bool atomic64_sub_and_test(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_sub_and_test(i, v);
}
static __always_inline bool atomic_add_negative(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic_add_negative(i, v);
}
static __always_inline bool atomic64_add_negative(s64 i, atomic64_t *v)
{
kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v));
return arch_atomic64_add_negative(i, v);
}
static __always_inline unsigned long
cmpxchg_size(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old, unsigned long new, int size)
{
kasan_check_write(ptr, size);
switch (size) {
case 1:
return arch_cmpxchg((u8 *)ptr, (u8)old, (u8)new);
case 2:
return arch_cmpxchg((u16 *)ptr, (u16)old, (u16)new);
case 4:
return arch_cmpxchg((u32 *)ptr, (u32)old, (u32)new);
case 8:
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(unsigned long) != 8);
return arch_cmpxchg((u64 *)ptr, (u64)old, (u64)new);
}
BUILD_BUG();
return 0;
}
#define cmpxchg(ptr, old, new) \
({ \
((__typeof__(*(ptr)))cmpxchg_size((ptr), (unsigned long)(old), \
(unsigned long)(new), sizeof(*(ptr)))); \
})
static __always_inline unsigned long
sync_cmpxchg_size(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old, unsigned long new,
int size)
{
kasan_check_write(ptr, size);
switch (size) {
case 1:
return arch_sync_cmpxchg((u8 *)ptr, (u8)old, (u8)new);
case 2:
return arch_sync_cmpxchg((u16 *)ptr, (u16)old, (u16)new);
case 4:
return arch_sync_cmpxchg((u32 *)ptr, (u32)old, (u32)new);
case 8:
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(unsigned long) != 8);
return arch_sync_cmpxchg((u64 *)ptr, (u64)old, (u64)new);
}
BUILD_BUG();
return 0;
}
#define sync_cmpxchg(ptr, old, new) \
({ \
((__typeof__(*(ptr)))sync_cmpxchg_size((ptr), \
(unsigned long)(old), (unsigned long)(new), \
sizeof(*(ptr)))); \
})
static __always_inline unsigned long
cmpxchg_local_size(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old, unsigned long new,
int size)
{
kasan_check_write(ptr, size);
switch (size) {
case 1:
return arch_cmpxchg_local((u8 *)ptr, (u8)old, (u8)new);
case 2:
return arch_cmpxchg_local((u16 *)ptr, (u16)old, (u16)new);
case 4:
return arch_cmpxchg_local((u32 *)ptr, (u32)old, (u32)new);
case 8:
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(unsigned long) != 8);
return arch_cmpxchg_local((u64 *)ptr, (u64)old, (u64)new);
}
BUILD_BUG();
return 0;
}
#define cmpxchg_local(ptr, old, new) \
({ \
((__typeof__(*(ptr)))cmpxchg_local_size((ptr), \
(unsigned long)(old), (unsigned long)(new), \
sizeof(*(ptr)))); \
})
static __always_inline u64
cmpxchg64_size(volatile u64 *ptr, u64 old, u64 new)
{
kasan_check_write(ptr, sizeof(*ptr));
return arch_cmpxchg64(ptr, old, new);
}
#define cmpxchg64(ptr, old, new) \
({ \
((__typeof__(*(ptr)))cmpxchg64_size((ptr), (u64)(old), \
(u64)(new))); \
})
static __always_inline u64
cmpxchg64_local_size(volatile u64 *ptr, u64 old, u64 new)
{
kasan_check_write(ptr, sizeof(*ptr));
return arch_cmpxchg64_local(ptr, old, new);
}
#define cmpxchg64_local(ptr, old, new) \
({ \
((__typeof__(*(ptr)))cmpxchg64_local_size((ptr), (u64)(old), \
(u64)(new))); \
})
/*
* Originally we had the following code here:
* __typeof__(p1) ____p1 = (p1);
* kasan_check_write(____p1, 2 * sizeof(*____p1));
* arch_cmpxchg_double(____p1, (p2), (o1), (o2), (n1), (n2));
* But it leads to compilation failures (see gcc issue 72873).
* So for now it's left non-instrumented.
* There are few callers of cmpxchg_double(), so it's not critical.
*/
#define cmpxchg_double(p1, p2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
({ \
arch_cmpxchg_double((p1), (p2), (o1), (o2), (n1), (n2)); \
})
#define cmpxchg_double_local(p1, p2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
({ \
arch_cmpxchg_double_local((p1), (p2), (o1), (o2), (n1), (n2)); \
})
#endif /* _LINUX_ATOMIC_INSTRUMENTED_H */

1
include/linux/mutex.h
View File

@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
#include <asm/current.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/spinlock_types.h>
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>

26
kernel/locking/lockdep.c
View File

@ -556,9 +556,9 @@ static void print_lock(struct held_lock *hlock)
return;
}
printk(KERN_CONT "%p", hlock->instance);
print_lock_name(lock_classes + class_idx - 1);
printk(KERN_CONT ", at: [<%p>] %pS\n",
(void *)hlock->acquire_ip, (void *)hlock->acquire_ip);
printk(KERN_CONT ", at: %pS\n", (void *)hlock->acquire_ip);
}
static void lockdep_print_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr)
@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
if (verbose(class)) {
graph_unlock();
printk("\nnew class %p: %s", class->key, class->name);
printk("\nnew class %px: %s", class->key, class->name);
if (class->name_version > 1)
printk(KERN_CONT "#%d", class->name_version);
printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
@ -1407,7 +1407,7 @@ static void print_lock_class_header(struct lock_class *class, int depth)
}
printk("%*s }\n", depth, "");
printk("%*s ... key at: [<%p>] %pS\n",
printk("%*s ... key at: [<%px>] %pS\n",
depth, "", class->key, class->key);
}
@ -2340,7 +2340,7 @@ cache_hit:
if (very_verbose(class)) {
printk("\nhash chain already cached, key: "
"%016Lx tail class: [%p] %s\n",
"%016Lx tail class: [%px] %s\n",
(unsigned long long)chain_key,
class->key, class->name);
}
@ -2349,7 +2349,7 @@ cache_hit:
}
if (very_verbose(class)) {
printk("\nnew hash chain, key: %016Lx tail class: [%p] %s\n",
printk("\nnew hash chain, key: %016Lx tail class: [%px] %s\n",
(unsigned long long)chain_key, class->key, class->name);
}
@ -2676,16 +2676,16 @@ check_usage_backwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
void print_irqtrace_events(struct task_struct *curr)
{
printk("irq event stamp: %u\n", curr->irq_events);
printk("hardirqs last enabled at (%u): [<%p>] %pS\n",
printk("hardirqs last enabled at (%u): [<%px>] %pS\n",
curr->hardirq_enable_event, (void *)curr->hardirq_enable_ip,
(void *)curr->hardirq_enable_ip);
printk("hardirqs last disabled at (%u): [<%p>] %pS\n",
printk("hardirqs last disabled at (%u): [<%px>] %pS\n",
curr->hardirq_disable_event, (void *)curr->hardirq_disable_ip,
(void *)curr->hardirq_disable_ip);
printk("softirqs last enabled at (%u): [<%p>] %pS\n",
printk("softirqs last enabled at (%u): [<%px>] %pS\n",
curr->softirq_enable_event, (void *)curr->softirq_enable_ip,
(void *)curr->softirq_enable_ip);
printk("softirqs last disabled at (%u): [<%p>] %pS\n",
printk("softirqs last disabled at (%u): [<%px>] %pS\n",
curr->softirq_disable_event, (void *)curr->softirq_disable_ip,
(void *)curr->softirq_disable_ip);
}
@ -3207,7 +3207,7 @@ static void __lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
* Sanity check, the lock-class key must be persistent:
*/
if (!static_obj(key)) {
printk("BUG: key %p not in .data!\n", key);
printk("BUG: key %px not in .data!\n", key);
/*
* What it says above ^^^^^, I suggest you read it.
*/
@ -3322,7 +3322,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
}
atomic_inc((atomic_t *)&class->ops);
if (very_verbose(class)) {
printk("\nacquire class [%p] %s", class->key, class->name);
printk("\nacquire class [%px] %s", class->key, class->name);
if (class->name_version > 1)
printk(KERN_CONT "#%d", class->name_version);
printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
@ -4376,7 +4376,7 @@ print_freed_lock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, const void *mem_from,
pr_warn("WARNING: held lock freed!\n");
print_kernel_ident();
pr_warn("-------------------------\n");
pr_warn("%s/%d is freeing memory %p-%p, with a lock still held there!\n",
pr_warn("%s/%d is freeing memory %px-%px, with a lock still held there!\n",
curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr), mem_from, mem_to-1);
print_lock(hlock);
lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);

3
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
View File

@ -1268,8 +1268,7 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
if (unlikely(ret)) {
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter);
}

11
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
View File

@ -52,12 +52,13 @@ static inline int rt_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
struct rt_mutex_waiter *w;
w = rb_entry(lock->waiters.rb_leftmost,
struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry);
BUG_ON(w->lock != lock);
struct rb_node *leftmost = rb_first_cached(&lock->waiters);
struct rt_mutex_waiter *w = NULL;
if (leftmost) {
w = rb_entry(leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry);
BUG_ON(w->lock != lock);
}
return w;
}

4
kernel/locking/rwsem.c
View File

@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_write_trylock);
void up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
rwsem_release(&sem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(sem->owner != RWSEM_READER_OWNED);
__up_read(sem);
}
@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(up_read);
void up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
rwsem_release(&sem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(sem->owner != current);
rwsem_clear_owner(sem);
__up_write(sem);
@ -142,6 +144,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(up_write);
void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
lock_downgrade(&sem->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(sem->owner != current);
rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
__downgrade_write(sem);
@ -211,6 +214,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_write_killable_nested);
void up_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(sem->owner != RWSEM_READER_OWNED);
__up_read(sem);
}

8
kernel/locking/rwsem.h
View File

@ -16,6 +16,12 @@
*/
#define RWSEM_READER_OWNED ((struct task_struct *)1UL)
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS
# define DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(c) DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(c)
#else
# define DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(c)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
/*
* All writes to owner are protected by WRITE_ONCE() to make sure that
@ -41,7 +47,7 @@ static inline void rwsem_set_reader_owned(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
* do a write to the rwsem cacheline when it is really necessary
* to minimize cacheline contention.
*/
if (sem->owner != RWSEM_READER_OWNED)
if (READ_ONCE(sem->owner) != RWSEM_READER_OWNED)
WRITE_ONCE(sem->owner, RWSEM_READER_OWNED);
}

150
lib/Kconfig.debug
View File

@ -1034,69 +1034,20 @@ config DEBUG_PREEMPT
menu "Lock Debugging (spinlocks, mutexes, etc...)"
config DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
bool "RT Mutex debugging, deadlock detection"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && RT_MUTEXES
help
This allows rt mutex semantics violations and rt mutex related
deadlocks (lockups) to be detected and reported automatically.
config DEBUG_SPINLOCK
bool "Spinlock and rw-lock debugging: basic checks"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
help
Say Y here and build SMP to catch missing spinlock initialization
and certain other kinds of spinlock errors commonly made. This is
best used in conjunction with the NMI watchdog so that spinlock
deadlocks are also debuggable.
config DEBUG_MUTEXES
bool "Mutex debugging: basic checks"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
help
This feature allows mutex semantics violations to be detected and
reported.
config DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
bool "Wait/wound mutex debugging: Slowpath testing"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
select DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
select DEBUG_SPINLOCK
select DEBUG_MUTEXES
help
This feature enables slowpath testing for w/w mutex users by
injecting additional -EDEADLK wound/backoff cases. Together with
the full mutex checks enabled with (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) this
will test all possible w/w mutex interface abuse with the
exception of simply not acquiring all the required locks.
Note that this feature can introduce significant overhead, so
it really should not be enabled in a production or distro kernel,
even a debug kernel. If you are a driver writer, enable it. If
you are a distro, do not.
config DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
bool "Lock debugging: detect incorrect freeing of live locks"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
select DEBUG_SPINLOCK
select DEBUG_MUTEXES
select DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES if RT_MUTEXES
select LOCKDEP
help
This feature will check whether any held lock (spinlock, rwlock,
mutex or rwsem) is incorrectly freed by the kernel, via any of the
memory-freeing routines (kfree(), kmem_cache_free(), free_pages(),
vfree(), etc.), whether a live lock is incorrectly reinitialized via
spin_lock_init()/mutex_init()/etc., or whether there is any lock
held during task exit.
config LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
bool
depends on TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
default y
config PROVE_LOCKING
bool "Lock debugging: prove locking correctness"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
select LOCKDEP
select DEBUG_SPINLOCK
select DEBUG_MUTEXES
select DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES if RT_MUTEXES
select DEBUG_RWSEMS if RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
select DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
select DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
select TRACE_IRQFLAGS
default n
@ -1134,20 +1085,9 @@ config PROVE_LOCKING
For more details, see Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt.
config LOCKDEP
bool
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
select STACKTRACE
select FRAME_POINTER if !MIPS && !PPC && !ARM_UNWIND && !S390 && !MICROBLAZE && !ARC && !SCORE && !X86
select KALLSYMS
select KALLSYMS_ALL
config LOCKDEP_SMALL
bool
config LOCK_STAT
bool "Lock usage statistics"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
select LOCKDEP
select DEBUG_SPINLOCK
select DEBUG_MUTEXES
@ -1167,6 +1107,80 @@ config LOCK_STAT
CONFIG_LOCK_STAT defines "contended" and "acquired" lock events.
(CONFIG_LOCKDEP defines "acquire" and "release" events.)
config DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
bool "RT Mutex debugging, deadlock detection"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && RT_MUTEXES
help
This allows rt mutex semantics violations and rt mutex related
deadlocks (lockups) to be detected and reported automatically.
config DEBUG_SPINLOCK
bool "Spinlock and rw-lock debugging: basic checks"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
help
Say Y here and build SMP to catch missing spinlock initialization
and certain other kinds of spinlock errors commonly made. This is
best used in conjunction with the NMI watchdog so that spinlock
deadlocks are also debuggable.
config DEBUG_MUTEXES
bool "Mutex debugging: basic checks"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
help
This feature allows mutex semantics violations to be detected and
reported.
config DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH
bool "Wait/wound mutex debugging: Slowpath testing"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
select DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
select DEBUG_SPINLOCK
select DEBUG_MUTEXES
help
This feature enables slowpath testing for w/w mutex users by
injecting additional -EDEADLK wound/backoff cases. Together with
the full mutex checks enabled with (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) this
will test all possible w/w mutex interface abuse with the
exception of simply not acquiring all the required locks.
Note that this feature can introduce significant overhead, so
it really should not be enabled in a production or distro kernel,
even a debug kernel. If you are a driver writer, enable it. If
you are a distro, do not.
config DEBUG_RWSEMS
bool "RW Semaphore debugging: basic checks"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
help
This debugging feature allows mismatched rw semaphore locks and unlocks
to be detected and reported.
config DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
bool "Lock debugging: detect incorrect freeing of live locks"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
select DEBUG_SPINLOCK
select DEBUG_MUTEXES
select DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES if RT_MUTEXES
select LOCKDEP
help
This feature will check whether any held lock (spinlock, rwlock,
mutex or rwsem) is incorrectly freed by the kernel, via any of the
memory-freeing routines (kfree(), kmem_cache_free(), free_pages(),
vfree(), etc.), whether a live lock is incorrectly reinitialized via
spin_lock_init()/mutex_init()/etc., or whether there is any lock
held during task exit.
config LOCKDEP
bool
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
select STACKTRACE
select FRAME_POINTER if !MIPS && !PPC && !ARM_UNWIND && !S390 && !MICROBLAZE && !ARC && !SCORE && !X86
select KALLSYMS
select KALLSYMS_ALL
config LOCKDEP_SMALL
bool
config DEBUG_LOCKDEP
bool "Lock dependency engine debugging"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCKDEP

29
tools/memory-model/Documentation/cheatsheet.txt Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
Prior Operation Subsequent Operation
--------------- ---------------------------
C Self R W RWM Self R W DR DW RMW SV
-- ---- - - --- ---- - - -- -- --- --
Store, e.g., WRITE_ONCE() Y Y
Load, e.g., READ_ONCE() Y Y Y Y
Unsuccessful RMW operation Y Y Y Y
rcu_dereference() Y Y Y Y
Successful *_acquire() R Y Y Y Y Y Y
Successful *_release() C Y Y Y W Y
smp_rmb() Y R Y Y R
smp_wmb() Y W Y Y W
smp_mb() & synchronize_rcu() CP Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Successful full non-void RMW CP Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
smp_mb__before_atomic() CP Y Y Y a a a a Y
smp_mb__after_atomic() CP a a Y Y Y Y Y
Key: C: Ordering is cumulative
P: Ordering propagates
R: Read, for example, READ_ONCE(), or read portion of RMW
W: Write, for example, WRITE_ONCE(), or write portion of RMW
Y: Provides ordering
a: Provides ordering given intervening RMW atomic operation
DR: Dependent read (address dependency)
DW: Dependent write (address, data, or control dependency)
RMW: Atomic read-modify-write operation
SV Same-variable access

1845
tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt Normal file
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

570
tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,570 @@
This document provides "recipes", that is, litmus tests for commonly
occurring situations, as well as a few that illustrate subtly broken but
attractive nuisances. Many of these recipes include example code from
v4.13 of the Linux kernel.
The first section covers simple special cases, the second section
takes off the training wheels to cover more involved examples,
and the third section provides a few rules of thumb.
Simple special cases
====================
This section presents two simple special cases, the first being where
there is only one CPU or only one memory location is accessed, and the
second being use of that old concurrency workhorse, locking.
Single CPU or single memory location
------------------------------------
If there is only one CPU on the one hand or only one variable
on the other, the code will execute in order. There are (as
usual) some things to be careful of:
1. Some aspects of the C language are unordered. For example,
in the expression "f(x) + g(y)", the order in which f and g are
called is not defined; the object code is allowed to use either
order or even to interleave the computations.
2. Compilers are permitted to use the "as-if" rule. That is, a
compiler can emit whatever code it likes for normal accesses,
as long as the results of a single-threaded execution appear
just as if the compiler had followed all the relevant rules.
To see this, compile with a high level of optimization and run
the debugger on the resulting binary.
3. If there is only one variable but multiple CPUs, that variable
must be properly aligned and all accesses to that variable must
be full sized. Variables that straddle cachelines or pages void
your full-ordering warranty, as do undersized accesses that load
from or store to only part of the variable.
4. If there are multiple CPUs, accesses to shared variables should
use READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() or stronger to prevent load/store
tearing, load/store fusing, and invented loads and stores.
There are exceptions to this rule, including:
i. When there is no possibility of a given shared variable
being updated by some other CPU, for example, while
holding the update-side lock, reads from that variable
need not use READ_ONCE().
ii. When there is no possibility of a given shared variable
being either read or updated by other CPUs, for example,
when running during early boot, reads from that variable
need not use READ_ONCE() and writes to that variable
need not use WRITE_ONCE().
Locking
-------
Locking is well-known and straightforward, at least if you don't think
about it too hard. And the basic rule is indeed quite simple: Any CPU that
has acquired a given lock sees any changes previously seen or made by any
CPU before it released that same lock. Note that this statement is a bit
stronger than "Any CPU holding a given lock sees all changes made by any
CPU during the time that CPU was holding this same lock". For example,
consider the following pair of code fragments:
/* See MP+polocks.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
spin_lock(&mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(y, 1);
spin_unlock(&mylock);
}
void CPU1(void)
{
spin_lock(&mylock);
r0 = READ_ONCE(y);
spin_unlock(&mylock);
r1 = READ_ONCE(x);
}
The basic rule guarantees that if CPU0() acquires mylock before CPU1(),
then both r0 and r1 must be set to the value 1. This also has the
consequence that if the final value of r0 is equal to 1, then the final
value of r1 must also be equal to 1. In contrast, the weaker rule would
say nothing about the final value of r1.
The converse to the basic rule also holds, as illustrated by the
following litmus test:
/* See MP+porevlocks.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
r0 = READ_ONCE(y);
spin_lock(&mylock);
r1 = READ_ONCE(x);
spin_unlock(&mylock);
}
void CPU1(void)
{
spin_lock(&mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
spin_unlock(&mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(y, 1);
}
This converse to the basic rule guarantees that if CPU0() acquires
mylock before CPU1(), then both r0 and r1 must be set to the value 0.
This also has the consequence that if the final value of r1 is equal
to 0, then the final value of r0 must also be equal to 0. In contrast,
the weaker rule would say nothing about the final value of r0.
These examples show only a single pair of CPUs, but the effects of the
locking basic rule extend across multiple acquisitions of a given lock
across multiple CPUs.
However, it is not necessarily the case that accesses ordered by
locking will be seen as ordered by CPUs not holding that lock.
Consider this example:
/* See Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
spin_lock(&mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
WRITE_ONCE(y, 1);
spin_unlock(&mylock);
}
void CPU1(void)
{
spin_lock(&mylock);
r0 = READ_ONCE(y);
WRITE_ONCE(z, 1);
spin_unlock(&mylock);
}
void CPU2(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(z, 2);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(x);
}
Counter-intuitive though it might be, it is quite possible to have
the final value of r0 be 1, the final value of z be 2, and the final
value of r1 be 0. The reason for this surprising outcome is that
CPU2() never acquired the lock, and thus did not benefit from the
lock's ordering properties.
Ordering can be extended to CPUs not holding the lock by careful use
of smp_mb__after_spinlock():
/* See Z6.0+pooncelock+poonceLock+pombonce.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
spin_lock(&mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
WRITE_ONCE(y, 1);
spin_unlock(&mylock);
}
void CPU1(void)
{
spin_lock(&mylock);
smp_mb__after_spinlock();
r0 = READ_ONCE(y);
WRITE_ONCE(z, 1);
spin_unlock(&mylock);
}
void CPU2(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(z, 2);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(x);
}
This addition of smp_mb__after_spinlock() strengthens the lock acquisition
sufficiently to rule out the counter-intuitive outcome.
Taking off the training wheels
==============================
This section looks at more complex examples, including message passing,
load buffering, release-acquire chains, store buffering.
Many classes of litmus tests have abbreviated names, which may be found
here: https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/ppc-supplemental/test6.pdf
Message passing (MP)
--------------------
The MP pattern has one CPU execute a pair of stores to a pair of variables
and another CPU execute a pair of loads from this same pair of variables,
but in the opposite order. The goal is to avoid the counter-intuitive
outcome in which the first load sees the value written by the second store
but the second load does not see the value written by the first store.
In the absence of any ordering, this goal may not be met, as can be seen
in the MP+poonceonces.litmus litmus test. This section therefore looks at
a number of ways of meeting this goal.
Release and acquire
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Use of smp_store_release() and smp_load_acquire() is one way to force
the desired MP ordering. The general approach is shown below:
/* See MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
smp_store_release(&y, 1);
}
void CPU1(void)
{
r0 = smp_load_acquire(&y);
r1 = READ_ONCE(x);
}
The smp_store_release() macro orders any prior accesses against the
store, while the smp_load_acquire macro orders the load against any
subsequent accesses. Therefore, if the final value of r0 is the value 1,
the final value of r1 must also be the value 1.
The init_stack_slab() function in lib/stackdepot.c uses release-acquire
in this way to safely initialize of a slab of the stack. Working out
the mutual-exclusion design is left as an exercise for the reader.
Assign and dereference
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Use of rcu_assign_pointer() and rcu_dereference() is quite similar to the
use of smp_store_release() and smp_load_acquire(), except that both
rcu_assign_pointer() and rcu_dereference() operate on RCU-protected
pointers. The general approach is shown below:
/* See MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus. */
int z;
int *y = &z;
int x;
void CPU0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
rcu_assign_pointer(y, &x);
}
void CPU1(void)
{
rcu_read_lock();
r0 = rcu_dereference(y);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*r0);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
In this example, if the final value of r0 is &x then the final value of
r1 must be 1.
The rcu_assign_pointer() macro has the same ordering properties as does
smp_store_release(), but the rcu_dereference() macro orders the load only
against later accesses that depend on the value loaded. A dependency
is present if the value loaded determines the address of a later access
(address dependency, as shown above), the value written by a later store
(data dependency), or whether or not a later store is executed in the
first place (control dependency). Note that the term "data dependency"
is sometimes casually used to cover both address and data dependencies.
In lib/prime_numbers.c, the expand_to_next_prime() function invokes
rcu_assign_pointer(), and the next_prime_number() function invokes
rcu_dereference(). This combination mediates access to a bit vector
that is expanded as additional primes are needed.
Write and read memory barriers
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is usually better to use smp_store_release() instead of smp_wmb()
and to use smp_load_acquire() instead of smp_rmb(). However, the older
smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() APIs are still heavily used, so it is important
to understand their use cases. The general approach is shown below:
/* See MP+wmbonceonce+rmbonceonce.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(y, 1);
}
void CPU1(void)
{
r0 = READ_ONCE(y);
smp_rmb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(x);
}
The smp_wmb() macro orders prior stores against later stores, and the
smp_rmb() macro orders prior loads against later loads. Therefore, if
the final value of r0 is 1, the final value of r1 must also be 1.
The the xlog_state_switch_iclogs() function in fs/xfs/xfs_log.c contains
the following write-side code fragment:
log->l_curr_block -= log->l_logBBsize;
ASSERT(log->l_curr_block >= 0);
smp_wmb();
log->l_curr_cycle++;
And the xlog_valid_lsn() function in fs/xfs/xfs_log_priv.h contains
the corresponding read-side code fragment:
cur_cycle = ACCESS_ONCE(log->l_curr_cycle);
smp_rmb();
cur_block = ACCESS_ONCE(log->l_curr_block);
Alternatively, consider the following comment in function
perf_output_put_handle() in kernel/events/ring_buffer.c:
* kernel user
*
* if (LOAD ->data_tail) { LOAD ->data_head
* (A) smp_rmb() (C)
* STORE $data LOAD $data
* smp_wmb() (B) smp_mb() (D)
* STORE ->data_head STORE ->data_tail
* }
The B/C pairing is an example of the MP pattern using smp_wmb() on the
write side and smp_rmb() on the read side.
Of course, given that smp_mb() is strictly stronger than either smp_wmb()
or smp_rmb(), any code fragment that would work with smp_rmb() and
smp_wmb() would also work with smp_mb() replacing either or both of the
weaker barriers.
Load buffering (LB)
-------------------
The LB pattern has one CPU load from one variable and then store to a
second, while another CPU loads from the second variable and then stores
to the first. The goal is to avoid the counter-intuitive situation where
each load reads the value written by the other CPU's store. In the
absence of any ordering it is quite possible that this may happen, as
can be seen in the LB+poonceonces.litmus litmus test.
One way of avoiding the counter-intuitive outcome is through the use of a
control dependency paired with a full memory barrier:
/* See LB+ctrlonceonce+mbonceonce.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
r0 = READ_ONCE(x);
if (r0)
WRITE_ONCE(y, 1);
}
void CPU1(void)
{
r1 = READ_ONCE(y);
smp_mb();
WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
}
This pairing of a control dependency in CPU0() with a full memory
barrier in CPU1() prevents r0 and r1 from both ending up equal to 1.
The A/D pairing from the ring-buffer use case shown earlier also
illustrates LB. Here is a repeat of the comment in
perf_output_put_handle() in kernel/events/ring_buffer.c, showing a
control dependency on the kernel side and a full memory barrier on
the user side:
* kernel user
*
* if (LOAD ->data_tail) { LOAD ->data_head
* (A) smp_rmb() (C)
* STORE $data LOAD $data
* smp_wmb() (B) smp_mb() (D)
* STORE ->data_head STORE ->data_tail
* }
*
* Where A pairs with D, and B pairs with C.
The kernel's control dependency between the load from ->data_tail
and the store to data combined with the user's full memory barrier
between the load from data and the store to ->data_tail prevents
the counter-intuitive outcome where the kernel overwrites the data
before the user gets done loading it.
Release-acquire chains
----------------------
Release-acquire chains are a low-overhead, flexible, and easy-to-use
method of maintaining order. However, they do have some limitations that
need to be fully understood. Here is an example that maintains order:
/* See ISA2+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+poacquireonce.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
smp_store_release(&y, 1);
}
void CPU1(void)
{
r0 = smp_load_acquire(y);
smp_store_release(&z, 1);
}
void CPU2(void)
{
r1 = smp_load_acquire(z);
r2 = READ_ONCE(x);
}
In this case, if r0 and r1 both have final values of 1, then r2 must
also have a final value of 1.
The ordering in this example is stronger than it needs to be. For
example, ordering would still be preserved if CPU1()'s smp_load_acquire()
invocation was replaced with READ_ONCE().
It is tempting to assume that CPU0()'s store to x is globally ordered
before CPU1()'s store to z, but this is not the case:
/* See Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+mbonceonce.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
smp_store_release(&y, 1);
}
void CPU1(void)
{
r0 = smp_load_acquire(y);
smp_store_release(&z, 1);
}
void CPU2(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(z, 2);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(x);
}
One might hope that if the final value of r0 is 1 and the final value
of z is 2, then the final value of r1 must also be 1, but it really is
possible for r1 to have the final value of 0. The reason, of course,
is that in this version, CPU2() is not part of the release-acquire chain.
This situation is accounted for in the rules of thumb below.
Despite this limitation, release-acquire chains are low-overhead as
well as simple and powerful, at least as memory-ordering mechanisms go.
Store buffering
---------------
Store buffering can be thought of as upside-down load buffering, so
that one CPU first stores to one variable and then loads from a second,
while another CPU stores to the second variable and then loads from the
first. Preserving order requires nothing less than full barriers:
/* See SB+mbonceonces.litmus. */
void CPU0(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
smp_mb();
r0 = READ_ONCE(y);
}
void CPU1(void)
{
WRITE_ONCE(y, 1);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(x);
}
Omitting either smp_mb() will allow both r0 and r1 to have final
values of 0, but providing both full barriers as shown above prevents
this counter-intuitive outcome.
This pattern most famously appears as part of Dekker's locking
algorithm, but it has a much more practical use within the Linux kernel
of ordering wakeups. The following comment taken from waitqueue_active()
in include/linux/wait.h shows the canonical pattern:
* CPU0 - waker CPU1 - waiter
*
* for (;;) {
* @cond = true; prepare_to_wait(&wq_head, &wait, state);
* smp_mb(); // smp_mb() from set_current_state()
* if (waitqueue_active(wq_head)) if (@cond)
* wake_up(wq_head); break;
* schedule();
* }
* finish_wait(&wq_head, &wait);
On CPU0, the store is to @cond and the load is in waitqueue_active().
On CPU1, prepare_to_wait() contains both a store to wq_head and a call
to set_current_state(), which contains an smp_mb() barrier; the load is
"if (@cond)". The full barriers prevent the undesirable outcome where
CPU1 puts the waiting task to sleep and CPU0 fails to wake it up.
Note that use of locking can greatly simplify this pattern.
Rules of thumb
==============
There might seem to be no pattern governing what ordering primitives are
needed in which situations, but this is not the case. There is a pattern
based on the relation between the accesses linking successive CPUs in a
given litmus test. There are three types of linkage:
1. Write-to-read, where the next CPU reads the value that the
previous CPU wrote. The LB litmus-test patterns contain only
this type of relation. In formal memory-modeling texts, this
relation is called "reads-from" and is usually abbreviated "rf".
2. Read-to-write, where the next CPU overwrites the value that the
previous CPU read. The SB litmus test contains only this type
of relation. In formal memory-modeling texts, this relation is
often called "from-reads" and is sometimes abbreviated "fr".
3. Write-to-write, where the next CPU overwrites the value written
by the previous CPU. The Z6.0 litmus test pattern contains a
write-to-write relation between the last access of CPU1() and
the first access of CPU2(). In formal memory-modeling texts,
this relation is often called "coherence order" and is sometimes
abbreviated "co". In the C++ standard, it is instead called
"modification order" and often abbreviated "mo".
The strength of memory ordering required for a given litmus test to
avoid a counter-intuitive outcome depends on the types of relations
linking the memory accesses for the outcome in question:
o If all links are write-to-read links, then the weakest
possible ordering within each CPU suffices. For example, in
the LB litmus test, a control dependency was enough to do the
job.
o If all but one of the links are write-to-read links, then a
release-acquire chain suffices. Both the MP and the ISA2
litmus tests illustrate this case.
o If more than one of the links are something other than
write-to-read links, then a full memory barrier is required
between each successive pair of non-write-to-read links. This
case is illustrated by the Z6.0 litmus tests, both in the
locking and in the release-acquire sections.
However, if you find yourself having to stretch these rules of thumb
to fit your situation, you should consider creating a litmus test and
running it on the model.

107
tools/memory-model/Documentation/references.txt Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
This document provides background reading for memory models and related
tools. These documents are aimed at kernel hackers who are interested
in memory models.
Hardware manuals and models
===========================
o SPARC International Inc. (Ed.). 1994. "The SPARC Architecture
Reference Manual Version 9". SPARC International Inc.
o Compaq Computer Corporation (Ed.). 2002. "Alpha Architecture
Reference Manual". Compaq Computer Corporation.
o Intel Corporation (Ed.). 2002. "A Formal Specification of Intel
Itanium Processor Family Memory Ordering". Intel Corporation.
o Intel Corporation (Ed.). 2002. "Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures
Software Developer’s Manual". Intel Corporation.
o Peter Sewell, Susmit Sarkar, Scott Owens, Francesco Zappa Nardelli,
and Magnus O. Myreen. 2010. "x86-TSO: A Rigorous and Usable
Programmer's Model for x86 Multiprocessors". Commun. ACM 53, 7
(July, 2010), 89-97. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1785414.1785443
o IBM Corporation (Ed.). 2009. "Power ISA Version 2.06". IBM
Corporation.
o ARM Ltd. (Ed.). 2009. "ARM Barrier Litmus Tests and Cookbook".
ARM Ltd.
o Susmit Sarkar, Peter Sewell, Jade Alglave, Luc Maranget, and
Derek Williams. 2011. "Understanding POWER Multiprocessors". In
Proceedings of the 32Nd ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming
Language Design and Implementation (PLDI ’11). ACM, New York,
NY, USA, 175–186.
o Susmit Sarkar, Kayvan Memarian, Scott Owens, Mark Batty,
Peter Sewell, Luc Maranget, Jade Alglave, and Derek Williams.
2012. "Synchronising C/C++ and POWER". In Proceedings of the 33rd
ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and
Implementation (PLDI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 311-322.
o ARM Ltd. (Ed.). 2014. "ARM Architecture Reference Manual (ARMv8,
for ARMv8-A architecture profile)". ARM Ltd.
o Imagination Technologies, LTD. 2015. "MIPS(R) Architecture
For Programmers, Volume II-A: The MIPS64(R) Instruction,
Set Reference Manual". Imagination Technologies,
LTD. https://imgtec.com/?do-download=4302.
o Shaked Flur, Kathryn E. Gray, Christopher Pulte, Susmit
Sarkar, Ali Sezgin, Luc Maranget, Will Deacon, and Peter
Sewell. 2016. "Modelling the ARMv8 Architecture, Operationally:
Concurrency and ISA". In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM
SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages
(POPL ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 608–621.
o Shaked Flur, Susmit Sarkar, Christopher Pulte, Kyndylan Nienhuis,
Luc Maranget, Kathryn E. Gray, Ali Sezgin, Mark Batty, and Peter
Sewell. 2017. "Mixed-size Concurrency: ARM, POWER, C/C++11,
and SC". In Proceedings of the 44th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on
Principles of Programming Languages (POPL 2017). ACM, New York,
NY, USA, 429–442.
Linux-kernel memory model
=========================
o Andrea Parri, Alan Stern, Luc Maranget, Paul E. McKenney,
and Jade Alglave. 2017. "A formal model of
Linux-kernel memory ordering - companion webpage".
http://moscova.inria.fr/∼maranget/cats7/linux/. (2017). [Online;
accessed 30-January-2017].
o Jade Alglave, Luc Maranget, Paul E. McKenney, Andrea Parri, and
Alan Stern. 2017. "A formal kernel memory-ordering model (part 1)"
Linux Weekly News. https://lwn.net/Articles/718628/
o Jade Alglave, Luc Maranget, Paul E. McKenney, Andrea Parri, and
Alan Stern. 2017. "A formal kernel memory-ordering model (part 2)"
Linux Weekly News. https://lwn.net/Articles/720550/
Memory-model tooling
====================
o Daniel Jackson. 2002. "Alloy: A Lightweight Object Modelling
Notation". ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 11, 2 (April 2002),
256–290. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/505145.505149
o Jade Alglave, Luc Maranget, and Michael Tautschnig. 2014. "Herding
Cats: Modelling, Simulation, Testing, and Data Mining for Weak
Memory". ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 36, 2, Article 7 (July
2014), 7:1–7:74 pages.
o Jade Alglave, Patrick Cousot, and Luc Maranget. 2016. "Syntax and
semantics of the weak consistency model specification language
cat". CoRR abs/1608.07531 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.07531
Memory-model comparisons
========================
o Paul E. McKenney, Ulrich Weigand, Andrea Parri, and Boqun
Feng. 2016. "Linux-Kernel Memory Model". (6 June 2016).
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2016/p0124r2.html.

206
tools/memory-model/README Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
=====================================
LINUX KERNEL MEMORY CONSISTENCY MODEL
=====================================
============
INTRODUCTION
============
This directory contains the memory consistency model (memory model, for
short) of the Linux kernel, written in the "cat" language and executable
by the externally provided "herd7" simulator, which exhaustively explores
the state space of small litmus tests.
In addition, the "klitmus7" tool (also externally provided) may be used
to convert a litmus test to a Linux kernel module, which in turn allows
that litmus test to be exercised within the Linux kernel.
============
REQUIREMENTS
============
Version 7.48 of the "herd7" and "klitmus7" tools must be downloaded
separately:
https://github.com/herd/herdtools7
See "herdtools7/INSTALL.md" for installation instructions.
==================
BASIC USAGE: HERD7
==================
The memory model is used, in conjunction with "herd7", to exhaustively
explore the state space of small litmus tests.
For example, to run SB+mbonceonces.litmus against the memory model:
$ herd7 -conf linux-kernel.cfg litmus-tests/SB+mbonceonces.litmus
Here is the corresponding output:
Test SB+mbonceonces Allowed
States 3
0:r0=0; 1:r0=1;
0:r0=1; 1:r0=0;
0:r0=1; 1:r0=1;
No
Witnesses
Positive: 0 Negative: 3
Condition exists (0:r0=0 /\ 1:r0=0)
Observation SB+mbonceonces Never 0 3
Time SB+mbonceonces 0.01
Hash=d66d99523e2cac6b06e66f4c995ebb48
The "Positive: 0 Negative: 3" and the "Never 0 3" each indicate that
this litmus test's "exists" clause can not be satisfied.
See "herd7 -help" or "herdtools7/doc/" for more information.
=====================
BASIC USAGE: KLITMUS7
=====================
The "klitmus7" tool converts a litmus test into a Linux kernel module,
which may then be loaded and run.
For example, to run SB+mbonceonces.litmus against hardware:
$ mkdir mymodules
$ klitmus7 -o mymodules litmus-tests/SB+mbonceonces.litmus
$ cd mymodules ; make
$ sudo sh run.sh
The corresponding output includes:
Test SB+mbonceonces Allowed
Histogram (3 states)
644580 :>0:r0=1; 1:r0=0;
644328 :>0:r0=0; 1:r0=1;
711092 :>0:r0=1; 1:r0=1;
No
Witnesses
Positive: 0, Negative: 2000000
Condition exists (0:r0=0 /\ 1:r0=0) is NOT validated
Hash=d66d99523e2cac6b06e66f4c995ebb48
Observation SB+mbonceonces Never 0 2000000
Time SB+mbonceonces 0.16
The "Positive: 0 Negative: 2000000" and the "Never 0 2000000" indicate
that during two million trials, the state specified in this litmus
test's "exists" clause was not reached.
And, as with "herd7", please see "klitmus7 -help" or "herdtools7/doc/"
for more information.
====================
DESCRIPTION OF FILES
====================
Documentation/cheatsheet.txt
Quick-reference guide to the Linux-kernel memory model.
Documentation/explanation.txt
Describes the memory model in detail.
Documentation/recipes.txt
Lists common memory-ordering patterns.
Documentation/references.txt
Provides background reading.
linux-kernel.bell
Categorizes the relevant instructions, including memory
references, memory barriers, atomic read-modify-write operations,
lock acquisition/release, and RCU operations.
More formally, this file (1) lists the subtypes of the various
event types used by the memory model and (2) performs RCU
read-side critical section nesting analysis.
linux-kernel.cat
Specifies what reorderings are forbidden by memory references,
memory barriers, atomic read-modify-write operations, and RCU.
More formally, this file specifies what executions are forbidden
by the memory model. Allowed executions are those which
satisfy the model's "coherence", "atomic", "happens-before",
"propagation", and "rcu" axioms, which are defined in the file.
linux-kernel.cfg
Convenience file that gathers the common-case herd7 command-line
arguments.
linux-kernel.def
Maps from C-like syntax to herd7's internal litmus-test
instruction-set architecture.
litmus-tests
Directory containing a few representative litmus tests, which
are listed in litmus-tests/README. A great deal more litmus
tests are available at https://github.com/paulmckrcu/litmus.
lock.cat
Provides a front-end analysis of lock acquisition and release,
for example, associating a lock acquisition with the preceding
and following releases and checking for self-deadlock.
More formally, this file defines a performance-enhanced scheme
for generation of the possible reads-from and coherence order
relations on the locking primitives.
README
This file.
===========
LIMITATIONS
===========
The Linux-kernel memory model has the following limitations:
1. Compiler optimizations are not modeled. Of course, the use
of READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() limits the compiler's ability
to optimize, but there is Linux-kernel code that uses bare C
memory accesses. Handling this code is on the to-do list.
For more information, see Documentation/explanation.txt (in
particular, the "THE PROGRAM ORDER RELATION: po AND po-loc"
and "A WARNING" sections).
2. Multiple access sizes for a single variable are not supported,
and neither are misaligned or partially overlapping accesses.
3. Exceptions and interrupts are not modeled. In some cases,
this limitation can be overcome by modeling the interrupt or
exception with an additional process.
4. I/O such as MMIO or DMA is not supported.
5. Self-modifying code (such as that found in the kernel's
alternatives mechanism, function tracer, Berkeley Packet Filter
JIT compiler, and module loader) is not supported.
6. Complete modeling of all variants of atomic read-modify-write
operations, locking primitives, and RCU is not provided.
For example, call_rcu() and rcu_barrier() are not supported.
However, a substantial amount of support is provided for these
operations, as shown in the linux-kernel.def file.
The "herd7" tool has some additional limitations of its own, apart from
the memory model:
1. Non-trivial data structures such as arrays or structures are
not supported. However, pointers are supported, allowing trivial
linked lists to be constructed.
2. Dynamic memory allocation is not supported, although this can
be worked around in some cases by supplying multiple statically
allocated variables.
Some of these limitations may be overcome in the future, but others are
more likely to be addressed by incorporating the Linux-kernel memory model
into other tools.

52
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.bell Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
(*
* Copyright (C) 2015 Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
* Copyright (C) 2016 Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr> for Inria
* Copyright (C) 2017 Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
* Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
*
* An earlier version of this file appears in the companion webpage for
* "Frightening small children and disconcerting grown-ups: Concurrency
* in the Linux kernel" by Alglave, Maranget, McKenney, Parri, and Stern,
* which is to appear in ASPLOS 2018.
*)
"Linux-kernel memory consistency model"
enum Accesses = 'once (*READ_ONCE,WRITE_ONCE,ACCESS_ONCE*) ||
'release (*smp_store_release*) ||
'acquire (*smp_load_acquire*) ||
'noreturn (* R of non-return RMW *)
instructions R[{'once,'acquire,'noreturn}]
instructions W[{'once,'release}]
instructions RMW[{'once,'acquire,'release}]
enum Barriers = 'wmb (*smp_wmb*) ||
'rmb (*smp_rmb*) ||
'mb (*smp_mb*) ||
'rcu-lock (*rcu_read_lock*) ||
'rcu-unlock (*rcu_read_unlock*) ||
'sync-rcu (*synchronize_rcu*) ||
'before-atomic (*smp_mb__before_atomic*) ||
'after-atomic (*smp_mb__after_atomic*) ||
'after-spinlock (*smp_mb__after_spinlock*)
instructions F[Barriers]
(* Compute matching pairs of nested Rcu-lock and Rcu-unlock *)
let matched = let rec
unmatched-locks = Rcu-lock \ domain(matched)
and unmatched-unlocks = Rcu-unlock \ range(matched)
and unmatched = unmatched-locks | unmatched-unlocks
and unmatched-po = [unmatched] ; po ; [unmatched]
and unmatched-locks-to-unlocks =
[unmatched-locks] ; po ; [unmatched-unlocks]
and matched = matched | (unmatched-locks-to-unlocks \
(unmatched-po ; unmatched-po))
in matched
(* Validate nesting *)
flag ~empty Rcu-lock \ domain(matched) as unbalanced-rcu-locking
flag ~empty Rcu-unlock \ range(matched) as unbalanced-rcu-locking
(* Outermost level of nesting only *)
let crit = matched \ (po^-1 ; matched ; po^-1)

121
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
(*
* Copyright (C) 2015 Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
* Copyright (C) 2016 Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr> for Inria
* Copyright (C) 2017 Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
* Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
*
* An earlier version of this file appears in the companion webpage for
* "Frightening small children and disconcerting grown-ups: Concurrency
* in the Linux kernel" by Alglave, Maranget, McKenney, Parri, and Stern,
* which is to appear in ASPLOS 2018.
*)
"Linux-kernel memory consistency model"
(*
* File "lock.cat" handles locks and is experimental.
* It can be replaced by include "cos.cat" for tests that do not use locks.
*)
include "lock.cat"
(*******************)
(* Basic relations *)
(*******************)
(* Fences *)
let rmb = [R \ Noreturn] ; fencerel(Rmb) ; [R \ Noreturn]
let wmb = [W] ; fencerel(Wmb) ; [W]
let mb = ([M] ; fencerel(Mb) ; [M]) |
([M] ; fencerel(Before-atomic) ; [RMW] ; po? ; [M]) |
([M] ; po? ; [RMW] ; fencerel(After-atomic) ; [M]) |
([M] ; po? ; [LKW] ; fencerel(After-spinlock) ; [M])
let gp = po ; [Sync-rcu] ; po?
let strong-fence = mb | gp
(* Release Acquire *)
let acq-po = [Acquire] ; po ; [M]
let po-rel = [M] ; po ; [Release]
let rfi-rel-acq = [Release] ; rfi ; [Acquire]
(**********************************)
(* Fundamental coherence ordering *)
(**********************************)
(* Sequential Consistency Per Variable *)
let com = rf | co | fr
acyclic po-loc | com as coherence
(* Atomic Read-Modify-Write *)
empty rmw & (fre ; coe) as atomic
(**********************************)
(* Instruction execution ordering *)
(**********************************)
(* Preserved Program Order *)
let dep = addr | data
let rwdep = (dep | ctrl) ; [W]
let overwrite = co | fr
let to-w = rwdep | (overwrite & int)
let to-r = addr | (dep ; rfi) | rfi-rel-acq
let fence = strong-fence | wmb | po-rel | rmb | acq-po
let ppo = to-r | to-w | fence
(* Propagation: Ordering from release operations and strong fences. *)
let A-cumul(r) = rfe? ; r
let cumul-fence = A-cumul(strong-fence | po-rel) | wmb
let prop = (overwrite & ext)? ; cumul-fence* ; rfe?
(*
* Happens Before: Ordering from the passage of time.
* No fences needed here for prop because relation confined to one process.
*)
let hb = ppo | rfe | ((prop \ id) & int)
acyclic hb as happens-before
(****************************************)
(* Write and fence propagation ordering *)
(****************************************)
(* Propagation: Each non-rf link needs a strong fence. *)
let pb = prop ; strong-fence ; hb*
acyclic pb as propagation
(*******)
(* RCU *)
(*******)
(*
* Effect of read-side critical section proceeds from the rcu_read_lock()
* onward on the one hand and from the rcu_read_unlock() backwards on the
* other hand.
*)
let rscs = po ; crit^-1 ; po?
(*
* The synchronize_rcu() strong fence is special in that it can order not
* one but two non-rf relations, but only in conjunction with an RCU
* read-side critical section.
*)
let link = hb* ; pb* ; prop
(* Chains that affect the RCU grace-period guarantee *)
let gp-link = gp ; link
let rscs-link = rscs ; link
(*
* A cycle containing at least as many grace periods as RCU read-side
* critical sections is forbidden.
*)
let rec rcu-path =
gp-link |
(gp-link ; rscs-link) |
(rscs-link ; gp-link) |
(rcu-path ; rcu-path) |
(gp-link ; rcu-path ; rscs-link) |
(rscs-link ; rcu-path ; gp-link)
irreflexive rcu-path as rcu

21
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cfg Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
macros linux-kernel.def
bell linux-kernel.bell
model linux-kernel.cat
graph columns
squished true
showevents noregs
movelabel true
fontsize 8
xscale 2.0
yscale 1.5
arrowsize 0.8
showinitrf false
showfinalrf false
showinitwrites false
splines spline
pad 0.1
edgeattr hb,color,indigo
edgeattr co,color,blue
edgeattr mb,color,darkgreen
edgeattr wmb,color,darkgreen
edgeattr rmb,color,darkgreen

106
tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
//
// An earlier version of this file appears in the companion webpage for
// "Frightening small children and disconcerting grown-ups: Concurrency
// in the Linux kernel" by Alglave, Maranget, McKenney, Parri, and Stern,
// which is to appear in ASPLOS 2018.
// ONCE
READ_ONCE(X) __load{once}(X)
WRITE_ONCE(X,V) { __store{once}(X,V); }
// Release Acquire and friends
smp_store_release(X,V) { __store{release}(*X,V); }
smp_load_acquire(X) __load{acquire}(*X)
rcu_assign_pointer(X,V) { __store{release}(X,V); }
rcu_dereference(X) __load{once}(X)
// Fences
smp_mb() { __fence{mb} ; }
smp_rmb() { __fence{rmb} ; }
smp_wmb() { __fence{wmb} ; }
smp_mb__before_atomic() { __fence{before-atomic} ; }
smp_mb__after_atomic() { __fence{after-atomic} ; }
smp_mb__after_spinlock() { __fence{after-spinlock} ; }
// Exchange
xchg(X,V) __xchg{mb}(X,V)
xchg_relaxed(X,V) __xchg{once}(X,V)
xchg_release(X,V) __xchg{release}(X,V)
xchg_acquire(X,V) __xchg{acquire}(X,V)
cmpxchg(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{mb}(X,V,W)
cmpxchg_relaxed(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{once}(X,V,W)
cmpxchg_acquire(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{acquire}(X,V,W)
cmpxchg_release(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{release}(X,V,W)
// Spinlocks
spin_lock(X) { __lock(X) ; }
spin_unlock(X) { __unlock(X) ; }
spin_trylock(X) __trylock(X)
// RCU
rcu_read_lock() { __fence{rcu-lock}; }
rcu_read_unlock() { __fence{rcu-unlock};}
synchronize_rcu() { __fence{sync-rcu}; }
synchronize_rcu_expedited() { __fence{sync-rcu}; }
// Atomic
atomic_read(X) READ_ONCE(*X)
atomic_set(X,V) { WRITE_ONCE(*X,V) ; }
atomic_read_acquire(X) smp_load_acquire(X)
atomic_set_release(X,V) { smp_store_release(X,V); }
atomic_add(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,+,V) ; }
atomic_sub(V,X) { __atomic_op(X,-,V) ; }
atomic_inc(X) { __atomic_op(X,+,1) ; }
atomic_dec(X) { __atomic_op(X,-,1) ; }
atomic_add_return(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,V)
atomic_add_return_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,V)
atomic_add_return_acquire(V,X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,+,V)
atomic_add_return_release(V,X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,+,V)
atomic_fetch_add(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,+,V)
atomic_fetch_add_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,+,V)
atomic_fetch_add_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,+,V)
atomic_fetch_add_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,+,V)
atomic_inc_return(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,1)
atomic_inc_return_relaxed(X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,+,1)
atomic_inc_return_acquire(X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,+,1)
atomic_inc_return_release(X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,+,1)
atomic_fetch_inc(X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,+,1)
atomic_fetch_inc_relaxed(X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,+,1)
atomic_fetch_inc_acquire(X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,+,1)
atomic_fetch_inc_release(X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,+,1)
atomic_sub_return(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,V)
atomic_sub_return_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,-,V)
atomic_sub_return_acquire(V,X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,-,V)
atomic_sub_return_release(V,X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,-,V)
atomic_fetch_sub(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,-,V)
atomic_fetch_sub_relaxed(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,-,V)
atomic_fetch_sub_acquire(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,-,V)
atomic_fetch_sub_release(V,X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,-,V)
atomic_dec_return(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,1)
atomic_dec_return_relaxed(X) __atomic_op_return{once}(X,-,1)
atomic_dec_return_acquire(X) __atomic_op_return{acquire}(X,-,1)
atomic_dec_return_release(X) __atomic_op_return{release}(X,-,1)
atomic_fetch_dec(X) __atomic_fetch_op{mb}(X,-,1)
atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed(X) __atomic_fetch_op{once}(X,-,1)
atomic_fetch_dec_acquire(X) __atomic_fetch_op{acquire}(X,-,1)
atomic_fetch_dec_release(X) __atomic_fetch_op{release}(X,-,1)
atomic_xchg(X,V) __xchg{mb}(X,V)
atomic_xchg_relaxed(X,V) __xchg{once}(X,V)
atomic_xchg_release(X,V) __xchg{release}(X,V)
atomic_xchg_acquire(X,V) __xchg{acquire}(X,V)
atomic_cmpxchg(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{mb}(X,V,W)
atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{once}(X,V,W)
atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{acquire}(X,V,W)
atomic_cmpxchg_release(X,V,W) __cmpxchg{release}(X,V,W)
atomic_sub_and_test(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,V) == 0
atomic_dec_and_test(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,-,1) == 0
atomic_inc_and_test(X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,1) == 0
atomic_add_negative(V,X) __atomic_op_return{mb}(X,+,V) < 0

26
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRR+poonceonce+Once.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
C CoRR+poonceonce+Once
(*
* Result: Never
*
* Test of read-read coherence, that is, whether or not two successive
* reads from the same variable are ordered.
*)
{}
P0(int *x)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
P1(int *x)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)

25
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoRW+poonceonce+Once.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
C CoRW+poonceonce+Once
(*
* Result: Never
*
* Test of read-write coherence, that is, whether or not a read from
* a given variable and a later write to that same variable are ordered.
*)
{}
P0(int *x)
{
int r0;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
P1(int *x)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 2);
}
exists (x=2 /\ 0:r0=2)

25
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWR+poonceonce+Once.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
C CoWR+poonceonce+Once
(*
* Result: Never
*
* Test of write-read coherence, that is, whether or not a write to a
* given variable and a later read from that same variable are ordered.
*)
{}
P0(int *x)
{
int r0;
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
P1(int *x)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 2);
}
exists (x=1 /\ 0:r0=2)

18
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/CoWW+poonceonce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
C CoWW+poonceonce
(*
* Result: Never
*
* Test of write-write coherence, that is, whether or not two successive
* writes to the same variable are ordered.
*)
{}
P0(int *x)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 2);
}
exists (x=1)

45
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/IRIW+mbonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
C IRIW+mbonceonces+OnceOnce
(*
* Result: Never
*
* Test of independent reads from independent writes with smp_mb()
* between each pairs of reads. In other words, is smp_mb() sufficient to
* cause two different reading processes to agree on the order of a pair
* of writes, where each write is to a different variable by a different
* process?
*)
{}
P0(int *x)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(*y);
}
P2(int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P3(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0 /\ 3:r0=1 /\ 3:r1=0)

43
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
C IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce
(*
* Result: Sometimes
*
* Test of independent reads from independent writes with nothing
* between each pairs of reads. In other words, is anything at all
* needed to cause two different reading processes to agree on the order
* of a pair of writes, where each write is to a different variable by a
* different process?
*)
{}
P0(int *x)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*y);
}
P2(int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P3(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0 /\ 3:r0=1 /\ 3:r1=0)

41
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
C ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
(*
* Result: Sometimes
*
* This test shows that the ordering provided by a lock-protected S
* litmus test (P0() and P1()) are not visible to external process P2().
* This is likely to change soon.
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
spin_lock(mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P1(int *y, int *z, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
int r0;
spin_lock(mylock);
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
WRITE_ONCE(*z, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P2(int *x, int *z)
{
int r1;
int r2;
r2 = READ_ONCE(*z);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 2:r2=1 /\ 2:r1=0)

37
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+poonceonces.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
C ISA2+poonceonces
(*
* Result: Sometimes
*
* Given a release-acquire chain ordering the first process's store
* against the last process's load, is ordering preserved if all of the
* smp_store_release() invocations are replaced by WRITE_ONCE() and all
* of the smp_load_acquire() invocations are replaced by READ_ONCE()?
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P1(int *y, int *z)
{
int r0;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
WRITE_ONCE(*z, 1);
}
P2(int *x, int *z)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*z);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 2:r0=1 /\ 2:r1=0)

39
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+poacquireonce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
C ISA2+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+poacquireonce
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test demonstrates that a release-acquire chain suffices
* to order P0()'s initial write against P2()'s final read. The reason
* that the release-acquire chain suffices is because in all but one
* case (P2() to P0()), each process reads from the preceding process's
* write. In memory-model-speak, there is only one non-reads-from
* (AKA non-rf) link, so release-acquire is all that is needed.
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
smp_store_release(y, 1);
}
P1(int *y, int *z)
{
int r0;
r0 = smp_load_acquire(y);
smp_store_release(z, 1);
}
P2(int *x, int *z)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = smp_load_acquire(z);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 2:r0=1 /\ 2:r1=0)

34
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+ctrlonceonce+mbonceonce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
C LB+ctrlonceonce+mbonceonce
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test demonstrates that lightweight ordering suffices for
* the load-buffering pattern, in other words, preventing all processes
* reading from the preceding process's write. In this example, the
* combination of a control dependency and a full memory barrier are enough
* to do the trick. (But the full memory barrier could be replaced with
* another control dependency and order would still be maintained.)
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
if (r0)
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
smp_mb();
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
exists (0:r0=1 /\ 1:r0=1)

29
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+poacquireonce+pooncerelease.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
C LB+poacquireonce+pooncerelease
(*
* Result: Never
*
* Does a release-acquire pair suffice for the load-buffering litmus
* test, where each process reads from one of two variables then writes
* to the other?
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
smp_store_release(y, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
r0 = smp_load_acquire(y);
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
exists (0:r0=1 /\ 1:r0=1)

28
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/LB+poonceonces.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
C LB+poonceonces
(*
* Result: Sometimes
*
* Can the counter-intuitive outcome for the load-buffering pattern
* be prevented even with no explicit ordering?
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
exists (0:r0=1 /\ 1:r0=1)

34
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
C MP+onceassign+derefonce
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test demonstrates that rcu_assign_pointer() and
* rcu_dereference() suffice to ensure that an RCU reader will not see
* pre-initialization garbage when it traverses an RCU-protected data
* structure containing a newly inserted element.
*)
{
y=z;
z=0;
}
P0(int *x, int **y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
rcu_assign_pointer(*y, x);
}
P1(int *x, int **y)
{
int *r0;
int r1;
rcu_read_lock();
r0 = rcu_dereference(*y);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*r0);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
exists (1:r0=x /\ 1:r1=0)

35
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+polocks.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
C MP+polocks
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test demonstrates how lock acquisitions and releases can
* stand in for smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release(), respectively.
* In other words, when holding a given lock (or indeed after releasing a
* given lock), a CPU is not only guaranteed to see the accesses that other
* CPUs made while previously holding that lock, it is also guaranteed
* to see all prior accesses by those other CPUs.
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
spin_lock(mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P1(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
int r0;
int r1;
spin_lock(mylock);
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
spin_unlock(mylock);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)

27
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+poonceonces.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
C MP+poonceonces
(*
* Result: Maybe
*
* Can the counter-intuitive message-passing outcome be prevented with
* no ordering at all?
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)

28
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
C MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test demonstrates that smp_store_release() and
* smp_load_acquire() provide sufficient ordering for the message-passing
* pattern.
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
smp_store_release(y, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = smp_load_acquire(y);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)

35
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+porevlocks.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
C MP+porevlocks
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test demonstrates how lock acquisitions and releases can
* stand in for smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release(), respectively.
* In other words, when holding a given lock (or indeed after releasing a
* given lock), a CPU is not only guaranteed to see the accesses that other
* CPUs made while previously holding that lock, it is also guaranteed to
* see all prior accesses by those other CPUs.
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
spin_lock(mylock);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P1(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
spin_lock(mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
exists (0:r0=1 /\ 0:r1=0)

30
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/MP+wmbonceonce+rmbonceonce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
C MP+wmbonceonce+rmbonceonce
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test demonstrates that smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() provide
* sufficient ordering for the message-passing pattern. However, it
* is usually better to use smp_store_release() and smp_load_acquire().
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
smp_rmb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 1:r1=0)

30
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+mbonceonces.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
C R+mbonceonces
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This is the fully ordered (via smp_mb()) version of one of the classic
* counterintuitive litmus tests that illustrates the effects of store
* propagation delays. Note that weakening either of the barriers would
* cause the resulting test to be allowed.
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
smp_mb();
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 2);
smp_mb();
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (y=2 /\ 1:r0=0)

27
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/R+poonceonces.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
C R+poonceonces
(*
* Result: Sometimes
*
* This is the unordered (thus lacking smp_mb()) version of one of the
* classic counterintuitive litmus tests that illustrates the effects of
* store propagation delays.
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 2);
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (y=2 /\ 1:r0=0)

131
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/README Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
This directory contains the following litmus tests:
CoRR+poonceonce+Once.litmus
Test of read-read coherence, that is, whether or not two
successive reads from the same variable are ordered.
CoRW+poonceonce+Once.litmus
Test of read-write coherence, that is, whether or not a read
from a given variable followed by a write to that same variable
are ordered.
CoWR+poonceonce+Once.litmus
Test of write-read coherence, that is, whether or not a write
to a given variable followed by a read from that same variable
are ordered.
CoWW+poonceonce.litmus
Test of write-write coherence, that is, whether or not two
successive writes to the same variable are ordered.
IRIW+mbonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
Test of independent reads from independent writes with smp_mb()
between each pairs of reads. In other words, is smp_mb()
sufficient to cause two different reading processes to agree on
the order of a pair of writes, where each write is to a different
variable by a different process?
IRIW+poonceonces+OnceOnce.litmus
Test of independent reads from independent writes with nothing
between each pairs of reads. In other words, is anything at all
needed to cause two different reading processes to agree on the
order of a pair of writes, where each write is to a different
variable by a different process?
ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
Tests whether the ordering provided by a lock-protected S
litmus test is visible to an external process whose accesses are
separated by smp_mb(). This addition of an external process to
S is otherwise known as ISA2.
ISA2+poonceonces.litmus
As below, but with store-release replaced with WRITE_ONCE()
and load-acquire replaced with READ_ONCE().
ISA2+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
Can a release-acquire chain order a prior store against
a later load?
LB+ctrlonceonce+mbonceonce.litmus
Does a control dependency and an smp_mb() suffice for the
load-buffering litmus test, where each process reads from one
of two variables then writes to the other?
LB+poacquireonce+pooncerelease.litmus
Does a release-acquire pair suffice for the load-buffering
litmus test, where each process reads from one of two variables then
writes to the other?
LB+poonceonces.litmus
As above, but with store-release replaced with WRITE_ONCE()
and load-acquire replaced with READ_ONCE().
MP+onceassign+derefonce.litmus
As below, but with rcu_assign_pointer() and an rcu_dereference().
MP+polocks.litmus
As below, but with the second access of the writer process
and the first access of reader process protected by a lock.
MP+poonceonces.litmus
As below, but without the smp_rmb() and smp_wmb().
MP+pooncerelease+poacquireonce.litmus
As below, but with a release-acquire chain.
MP+porevlocks.litmus
As below, but with the first access of the writer process
and the second access of reader process protected by a lock.
MP+wmbonceonce+rmbonceonce.litmus
Does a smp_wmb() (between the stores) and an smp_rmb() (between
the loads) suffice for the message-passing litmus test, where one
process writes data and then a flag, and the other process reads
the flag and then the data. (This is similar to the ISA2 tests,
but with two processes instead of three.)
R+mbonceonces.litmus
This is the fully ordered (via smp_mb()) version of one of
the classic counterintuitive litmus tests that illustrates the
effects of store propagation delays.
R+poonceonces.litmus
As above, but without the smp_mb() invocations.
SB+mbonceonces.litmus
This is the fully ordered (again, via smp_mb() version of store
buffering, which forms the core of Dekker's mutual-exclusion
algorithm.
SB+poonceonces.litmus
As above, but without the smp_mb() invocations.
S+poonceonces.litmus
As below, but without the smp_wmb() and acquire load.
S+wmbonceonce+poacquireonce.litmus
Can a smp_wmb(), instead of a release, and an acquire order
a prior store against a subsequent store?
WRC+poonceonces+Once.litmus
WRC+pooncerelease+rmbonceonce+Once.litmus
These two are members of an extension of the MP litmus-test class
in which the first write is moved to a separate process.
Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
Is the ordering provided by a spin_unlock() and a subsequent
spin_lock() sufficient to make ordering apparent to accesses
by a process not holding the lock?
Z6.0+pooncelock+poonceLock+pombonce.litmus
As above, but with smp_mb__after_spinlock() immediately
following the spin_lock().
Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+mbonceonce.litmus
Is the ordering provided by a release-acquire chain sufficient
to make ordering apparent to accesses by a process that does
not participate in that release-acquire chain?
A great many more litmus tests are available here:
https://github.com/paulmckrcu/litmus

28
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+poonceonces.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
C S+poonceonces
(*
* Result: Sometimes
*
* Starting with a two-process release-acquire chain ordering P0()'s
* first store against P1()'s final load, if the smp_store_release()
* is replaced by WRITE_ONCE() and the smp_load_acquire() replaced by
* READ_ONCE(), is ordering preserved?
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 2);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
exists (x=2 /\ 1:r0=1)

27
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/S+wmbonceonce+poacquireonce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
C S+wmbonceonce+poacquireonce
(*
* Result: Never
*
* Can a smp_wmb(), instead of a release, and an acquire order a prior
* store against a subsequent store?
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 2);
smp_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
r0 = smp_load_acquire(y);
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
exists (x=2 /\ 1:r0=1)

32
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+mbonceonces.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
C SB+mbonceonces
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test demonstrates that full memory barriers suffice to
* order the store-buffering pattern, where each process writes to the
* variable that the preceding process reads. (Locking and RCU can also
* suffice, but not much else.)
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
smp_mb();
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
smp_mb();
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (0:r0=0 /\ 1:r0=0)

29
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/SB+poonceonces.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
C SB+poonceonces
(*
* Result: Sometimes
*
* This litmus test demonstrates that at least some ordering is required
* to order the store-buffering pattern, where each process writes to the
* variable that the preceding process reads.
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (0:r0=0 /\ 1:r0=0)

35
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/WRC+poonceonces+Once.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
C WRC+poonceonces+Once
(*
* Result: Sometimes
*
* This litmus test is an extension of the message-passing pattern,
* where the first write is moved to a separate process. Note that this
* test has no ordering at all.
*)
{}
P0(int *x)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
}
P2(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 2:r0=1 /\ 2:r1=0)

36
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/WRC+pooncerelease+rmbonceonce+Once.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
C WRC+pooncerelease+rmbonceonce+Once
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test is an extension of the message-passing pattern, where
* the first write is moved to a separate process. Because it features
* a release and a read memory barrier, it should be forbidden.
*)
{}
P0(int *x)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
smp_store_release(y, 1);
}
P2(int *x, int *y)
{
int r0;
int r1;
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
smp_rmb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ 2:r0=1 /\ 2:r1=0)

42
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+poonceLock+pombonce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
C Z6.0+pooncelock+poonceLock+pombonce
(*
* Result: Never
*
* This litmus test demonstrates how smp_mb__after_spinlock() may be
* used to ensure that accesses in different critical sections for a
* given lock running on different CPUs are nevertheless seen in order
* by CPUs not holding that lock.
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
spin_lock(mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P1(int *y, int *z, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
int r0;
spin_lock(mylock);
smp_mb__after_spinlock();
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
WRITE_ONCE(*z, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P2(int *x, int *z)
{
int r1;
WRITE_ONCE(*z, 2);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ z=2 /\ 2:r1=0)

40
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
C Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce
(*
* Result: Sometimes
*
* This example demonstrates that a pair of accesses made by different
* processes each while holding a given lock will not necessarily be
* seen as ordered by a third process not holding that lock.
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
spin_lock(mylock);
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P1(int *y, int *z, spinlock_t *mylock)
{
int r0;
spin_lock(mylock);
r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
WRITE_ONCE(*z, 1);
spin_unlock(mylock);
}
P2(int *x, int *z)
{
int r1;
WRITE_ONCE(*z, 2);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ z=2 /\ 2:r1=0)

42
tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+mbonceonce.litmus Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
C Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+mbonceonce
(*
* Result: Sometimes
*
* This litmus test shows that a release-acquire chain, while sufficient
* when there is but one non-reads-from (AKA non-rf) link, does not suffice
* if there is more than one. Of the three processes, only P1() reads from
* P0's write, which means that there are two non-rf links: P1() to P2()
* is a write-to-write link (AKA a "coherence" or just "co" link) and P2()
* to P0() is a read-to-write link (AKA a "from-reads" or just "fr" link).
* When there are two or more non-rf links, you typically will need one
* full barrier for each non-rf link. (Exceptions include some cases
* involving locking.)
*)
{}
P0(int *x, int *y)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
smp_store_release(y, 1);
}
P1(int *y, int *z)
{
int r0;
r0 = smp_load_acquire(y);
smp_store_release(z, 1);
}
P2(int *x, int *z)
{
int r1;
WRITE_ONCE(*z, 2);
smp_mb();
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (1:r0=1 /\ z=2 /\ 2:r1=0)

99
tools/memory-model/lock.cat Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
(*
* Copyright (C) 2016 Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr> for Inria
* Copyright (C) 2017 Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
*)
(* Generate coherence orders and handle lock operations *)
include "cross.cat"
(* From lock reads to their partner lock writes *)
let lk-rmw = ([LKR] ; po-loc ; [LKW]) \ (po ; po)
let rmw = rmw | lk-rmw
(*
* A paired LKR must always see an unlocked value; spin_lock() calls nested
* inside a critical section (for the same lock) always deadlock.
*)
empty ([LKW] ; po-loc ; [domain(lk-rmw)]) \ (po-loc ; [UL] ; po-loc)
as lock-nest
(* The litmus test is invalid if an LKW event is not part of an RMW pair *)
flag ~empty LKW \ range(lk-rmw) as unpaired-LKW
(* This will be allowed if we implement spin_is_locked() *)
flag ~empty LKR \ domain(lk-rmw) as unpaired-LKR
(* There should be no R or W accesses to spinlocks *)
let ALL-LOCKS = LKR | LKW | UL | LF
flag ~empty [M \ IW] ; loc ; [ALL-LOCKS] as mixed-lock-accesses
(* The final value of a spinlock should not be tested *)
flag ~empty [FW] ; loc ; [ALL-LOCKS] as lock-final
(*
* Put lock operations in their appropriate classes, but leave UL out of W
* until after the co relation has been generated.
*)
let R = R | LKR | LF
let W = W | LKW
let Release = Release | UL
let Acquire = Acquire | LKR
(* Match LKW events to their corresponding UL events *)
let critical = ([LKW] ; po-loc ; [UL]) \ (po-loc ; [LKW | UL] ; po-loc)
flag ~empty UL \ range(critical) as unmatched-unlock
(* Allow up to one unmatched LKW per location; more must deadlock *)
let UNMATCHED-LKW = LKW \ domain(critical)
empty ([UNMATCHED-LKW] ; loc ; [UNMATCHED-LKW]) \ id as unmatched-locks
(* rfi for LF events: link each LKW to the LF events in its critical section *)
let rfi-lf = ([LKW] ; po-loc ; [LF]) \ ([LKW] ; po-loc ; [UL] ; po-loc)
(* rfe for LF events *)
let all-possible-rfe-lf =
(*
* Given an LF event r, compute the possible rfe edges for that event
* (all those starting from LKW events in other threads),
* and then convert that relation to a set of single-edge relations.
*)
let possible-rfe-lf r =
let pair-to-relation p = p ++ 0
in map pair-to-relation ((LKW * {r}) & loc & ext)
(* Do this for each LF event r that isn't in rfi-lf *)
in map possible-rfe-lf (LF \ range(rfi-lf))
(* Generate all rf relations for LF events *)
with rfe-lf from cross(all-possible-rfe-lf)
let rf = rf | rfi-lf | rfe-lf
(* Generate all co relations, including LKW events but not UL *)
let co0 = co0 | ([IW] ; loc ; [LKW]) |
(([LKW] ; loc ; [UNMATCHED-LKW]) \ [UNMATCHED-LKW])
include "cos-opt.cat"
let W = W | UL
let M = R | W
(* Merge UL events into co *)
let co = (co | critical | (critical^-1 ; co))+
let coe = co & ext
let coi = co & int
(* Merge LKR events into rf *)
let rf = rf | ([IW | UL] ; singlestep(co) ; lk-rmw^-1)
let rfe = rf & ext
let rfi = rf & int
let fr = rf^-1 ; co
let fre = fr & ext
let fri = fr & int
show co,rf,fr