From 6c2f91e077f1b60e7f83b7ee044f965f469cfdb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arjan van de Ven Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:51:30 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] proc: use WARN() rather than printk+backtrace Use WARN() rather than a printk() + backtrace(); this gives a more standard format message as well as complete information (including line numbers etc) that will be collected by kerneloops.org Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan --- fs/proc/generic.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c index 7821589a17d5..60a359b35582 100644 --- a/fs/proc/generic.c +++ b/fs/proc/generic.c @@ -547,9 +547,8 @@ static int proc_register(struct proc_dir_entry * dir, struct proc_dir_entry * dp for (tmp = dir->subdir; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) if (strcmp(tmp->name, dp->name) == 0) { - printk(KERN_WARNING "proc_dir_entry '%s/%s' already registered\n", + WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "proc_dir_entry '%s/%s' already registered\n", dir->name, dp->name); - dump_stack(); break; }