afs: Fix missing lock when replacing VL server list

When afs_update_cell() replaces the cell->vl_servers list, it uses RCU
protocol so that proc is protected, but doesn't take ->vl_servers_lock to
protect afs_start_vl_iteration() (which does actually take a shared lock).

Fix this by making afs_update_cell() take an exclusive lock when replacing
->vl_servers.

Fixes: 0a5143f2f8 ("afs: Implement VL server rotation")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Howells 2019-05-07 15:16:26 +01:00
parent 773e0c4025
commit 6b8812fc8e
1 changed files with 2 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -404,12 +404,11 @@ static void afs_update_cell(struct afs_cell *cell)
clear_bit(AFS_CELL_FL_DNS_FAIL, &cell->flags);
clear_bit(AFS_CELL_FL_NOT_FOUND, &cell->flags);
/* Exclusion on changing vl_addrs is achieved by a
* non-reentrant work item.
*/
write_lock(&cell->vl_servers_lock);
old = rcu_dereference_protected(cell->vl_servers, true);
rcu_assign_pointer(cell->vl_servers, vllist);
cell->dns_expiry = expiry;
write_unlock(&cell->vl_servers_lock);
if (old)
afs_put_vlserverlist(cell->net, old);