afs: Fix missing lock when replacing VL server list
When afs_update_cell() replaces the cell->vl_servers list, it uses RCU
protocol so that proc is protected, but doesn't take ->vl_servers_lock to
protect afs_start_vl_iteration() (which does actually take a shared lock).
Fix this by making afs_update_cell() take an exclusive lock when replacing
->vl_servers.
Fixes: 0a5143f2f8
("afs: Implement VL server rotation")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
773e0c4025
commit
6b8812fc8e
|
@ -404,12 +404,11 @@ static void afs_update_cell(struct afs_cell *cell)
|
|||
clear_bit(AFS_CELL_FL_DNS_FAIL, &cell->flags);
|
||||
clear_bit(AFS_CELL_FL_NOT_FOUND, &cell->flags);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Exclusion on changing vl_addrs is achieved by a
|
||||
* non-reentrant work item.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
write_lock(&cell->vl_servers_lock);
|
||||
old = rcu_dereference_protected(cell->vl_servers, true);
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(cell->vl_servers, vllist);
|
||||
cell->dns_expiry = expiry;
|
||||
write_unlock(&cell->vl_servers_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (old)
|
||||
afs_put_vlserverlist(cell->net, old);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue