workqueues: add comments to __create_workqueue_key()
Dmitry Adamushko pointed out that the error handling in __create_workqueue_key() is not clear, add the comment. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dbacefc9c4
commit
6af8bf3d86
|
@ -830,10 +830,21 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__create_workqueue_key(const char *name,
|
|||
start_workqueue_thread(cwq, -1);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cpu_maps_update_begin();
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must place this wq on list even if the code below fails.
|
||||
* cpu_down(cpu) can remove cpu from cpu_populated_map before
|
||||
* destroy_workqueue() takes the lock, in that case we leak
|
||||
* cwq[cpu]->thread.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_lock(&workqueue_lock);
|
||||
list_add(&wq->list, &workqueues);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&workqueue_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must initialize cwqs for each possible cpu even if we
|
||||
* are going to call destroy_workqueue() finally. Otherwise
|
||||
* cpu_up() can hit the uninitialized cwq once we drop the
|
||||
* lock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
|
||||
cwq = init_cpu_workqueue(wq, cpu);
|
||||
if (err || !cpu_online(cpu))
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue