padata: get_next is never NULL
Per Dan's static checker warning, the code that returns NULL was removed in 2010, so this patch updates the comments and fixes the code assumptions. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c46ea13f55
commit
69b348449b
|
@ -154,8 +154,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(padata_do_parallel);
|
|||
* A pointer to the control struct of the next object that needs
|
||||
* serialization, if present in one of the percpu reorder queues.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* NULL, if all percpu reorder queues are empty.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* -EINPROGRESS, if the next object that needs serialization will
|
||||
* be parallel processed by another cpu and is not yet present in
|
||||
* the cpu's reorder queue.
|
||||
|
@ -182,8 +180,6 @@ static struct padata_priv *padata_get_next(struct parallel_data *pd)
|
|||
cpu = padata_index_to_cpu(pd, next_index);
|
||||
next_queue = per_cpu_ptr(pd->pqueue, cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
padata = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
reorder = &next_queue->reorder;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&reorder->lock);
|
||||
|
@ -235,12 +231,11 @@ static void padata_reorder(struct parallel_data *pd)
|
|||
padata = padata_get_next(pd);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* All reorder queues are empty, or the next object that needs
|
||||
* serialization is parallel processed by another cpu and is
|
||||
* still on it's way to the cpu's reorder queue, nothing to
|
||||
* do for now.
|
||||
* If the next object that needs serialization is parallel
|
||||
* processed by another cpu and is still on it's way to the
|
||||
* cpu's reorder queue, nothing to do for now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!padata || PTR_ERR(padata) == -EINPROGRESS)
|
||||
if (PTR_ERR(padata) == -EINPROGRESS)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue