pinctrl: allow concurrent gpio and mux function ownership of pins
Per recent updates to Documentation/gpio.txt, gpiolib drivers should inform pinctrl when a GPIO is requested. pinctrl then marks that pin as in-use for that GPIO function. When an SoC muxes pins in a group, it's quite possible for the group to contain e.g. 6 pins, but only 4 of them actually be needed by the HW module that's mux'd to them. In this case, the other 2 pins could be used as GPIOs. However, pinctrl marks all the pins within the group as in-use by the selected mux function. To allow the expected gpiolib interaction, separate the concepts of pin ownership into two parts: One for the mux function and one for GPIO usage. Finally, allow those two ownerships to exist in parallel. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6c3b33f02
commit
652162d469
|
@ -119,15 +119,15 @@ struct pinctrl_setting {
|
|||
* @name: a name for the pin, e.g. the name of the pin/pad/finger on a
|
||||
* datasheet or such
|
||||
* @dynamic_name: if the name of this pin was dynamically allocated
|
||||
* @usecount: If zero, the pin is not claimed, and @owner should be NULL.
|
||||
* @mux_usecount: If zero, the pin is not claimed, and @owner should be NULL.
|
||||
* If non-zero, this pin is claimed by @owner. This field is an integer
|
||||
* rather than a boolean, since pinctrl_get() might process multiple
|
||||
* mapping table entries that refer to, and hence claim, the same group
|
||||
* or pin, and each of these will increment the @usecount.
|
||||
* @owner: The name of the entity owning the pin. Typically, this is the name
|
||||
* of the device that called pinctrl_get(). Alternatively, it may be the
|
||||
* name of the GPIO passed to pinctrl_request_gpio().
|
||||
* @mux_owner: The name of device that called pinctrl_get().
|
||||
* @mux_setting: The most recent selected mux setting for this pin, if any.
|
||||
* @gpio_owner: If pinctrl_request_gpio() was called for this pin, this is
|
||||
* the name of the GPIO that "owns" this pin.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct pin_desc {
|
||||
struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev;
|
||||
|
@ -135,9 +135,10 @@ struct pin_desc {
|
|||
bool dynamic_name;
|
||||
/* These fields only added when supporting pinmux drivers */
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_PINMUX
|
||||
unsigned usecount;
|
||||
const char *owner;
|
||||
unsigned mux_usecount;
|
||||
const char *mux_owner;
|
||||
const struct pinctrl_setting_mux *mux_setting;
|
||||
const char *gpio_owner;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -94,18 +94,29 @@ static int pin_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
|
|||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (desc->usecount && strcmp(desc->owner, owner)) {
|
||||
dev_err(pctldev->dev,
|
||||
"pin already requested\n");
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
if (gpio_range) {
|
||||
/* There's no need to support multiple GPIO requests */
|
||||
if (desc->gpio_owner) {
|
||||
dev_err(pctldev->dev,
|
||||
"pin already requested\n");
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
desc->gpio_owner = owner;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (desc->mux_usecount && strcmp(desc->mux_owner, owner)) {
|
||||
dev_err(pctldev->dev,
|
||||
"pin already requested\n");
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
desc->mux_usecount++;
|
||||
if (desc->mux_usecount > 1)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
desc->mux_owner = owner;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
desc->usecount++;
|
||||
if (desc->usecount > 1)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
desc->owner = owner;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Let each pin increase references to this module */
|
||||
if (!try_module_get(pctldev->owner)) {
|
||||
dev_err(pctldev->dev,
|
||||
|
@ -135,9 +146,13 @@ static int pin_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
|
|||
|
||||
out_free_pin:
|
||||
if (status) {
|
||||
desc->usecount--;
|
||||
if (!desc->usecount)
|
||||
desc->owner = NULL;
|
||||
if (gpio_range) {
|
||||
desc->gpio_owner = NULL;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
desc->mux_usecount--;
|
||||
if (!desc->mux_usecount)
|
||||
desc->mux_owner = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
out:
|
||||
if (status)
|
||||
|
@ -172,9 +187,11 @@ static const char *pin_free(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin,
|
|||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
desc->usecount--;
|
||||
if (desc->usecount)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
if (!gpio_range) {
|
||||
desc->mux_usecount--;
|
||||
if (desc->mux_usecount)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If there is no kind of request function for the pin we just assume
|
||||
|
@ -185,9 +202,15 @@ static const char *pin_free(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin,
|
|||
else if (ops->free)
|
||||
ops->free(pctldev, pin);
|
||||
|
||||
owner = desc->owner;
|
||||
desc->owner = NULL;
|
||||
desc->mux_setting = NULL;
|
||||
if (gpio_range) {
|
||||
owner = desc->gpio_owner;
|
||||
desc->gpio_owner = NULL;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
owner = desc->mux_owner;
|
||||
desc->mux_owner = NULL;
|
||||
desc->mux_setting = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
module_put(pctldev->owner);
|
||||
|
||||
return owner;
|
||||
|
@ -493,7 +516,7 @@ static int pinmux_pins_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what)
|
|||
unsigned i, pin;
|
||||
|
||||
seq_puts(s, "Pinmux settings per pin\n");
|
||||
seq_puts(s, "Format: pin (name): owner\n");
|
||||
seq_puts(s, "Format: pin (name): mux_owner gpio_owner hog?\n");
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&pinctrl_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -508,13 +531,16 @@ static int pinmux_pins_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what)
|
|||
if (desc == NULL)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (desc->owner &&
|
||||
!strcmp(desc->owner, pinctrl_dev_get_name(pctldev)))
|
||||
if (desc->mux_owner &&
|
||||
!strcmp(desc->mux_owner, pinctrl_dev_get_name(pctldev)))
|
||||
is_hog = true;
|
||||
|
||||
seq_printf(s, "pin %d (%s): %s%s", pin,
|
||||
seq_printf(s, "pin %d (%s): %s %s%s", pin,
|
||||
desc->name ? desc->name : "unnamed",
|
||||
desc->owner ? desc->owner : "UNCLAIMED",
|
||||
desc->mux_owner ? desc->mux_owner
|
||||
: "(MUX UNCLAIMED)",
|
||||
desc->gpio_owner ? desc->gpio_owner
|
||||
: "(GPIO UNCLAIMED)",
|
||||
is_hog ? " (HOG)" : "");
|
||||
|
||||
if (desc->mux_setting)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue