NFS: Be more targeted about readdirplus use when doing lookup/revalidation
There is little point in setting NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS in nfs_lookup and nfs_lookup_revalidate() unless a process is actually doing readdir on the parent directory. Furthermore, there is little point in using readdirplus if we're trying to revalidate a negative dentry. Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Tested-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
79f687a3de
commit
63519fbc67
30
fs/nfs/dir.c
30
fs/nfs/dir.c
|
@ -455,14 +455,18 @@ bool nfs_use_readdirplus(struct inode *dir, struct dir_context *ctx)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This function is called by the lookup code to request the use of
|
||||
* readdirplus to accelerate any future lookups in the same
|
||||
* This function is called by the lookup and getattr code to request the
|
||||
* use of readdirplus to accelerate any future lookups in the same
|
||||
* directory.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static
|
||||
void nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(struct inode *dir)
|
||||
{
|
||||
set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_I(dir)->flags);
|
||||
struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(dir);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nfs_server_capable(dir, NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS) &&
|
||||
!list_empty(&nfsi->open_files))
|
||||
set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &nfsi->flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -475,8 +479,11 @@ void nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(struct inode *dir)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
void nfs_force_use_readdirplus(struct inode *dir)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!list_empty(&NFS_I(dir)->open_files)) {
|
||||
nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(dir);
|
||||
struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(dir);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nfs_server_capable(dir, NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS) &&
|
||||
!list_empty(&nfsi->open_files)) {
|
||||
set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &nfsi->flags);
|
||||
invalidate_mapping_pages(dir->i_mapping, 0, -1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1150,7 +1157,7 @@ static int nfs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
|
|||
return -ECHILD;
|
||||
goto out_bad;
|
||||
}
|
||||
goto out_valid_noent;
|
||||
goto out_valid;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_bad_inode(inode)) {
|
||||
|
@ -1173,6 +1180,7 @@ static int nfs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
|
|||
return -ECHILD;
|
||||
goto out_zap_parent;
|
||||
}
|
||||
nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(dir);
|
||||
goto out_valid;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1208,12 +1216,12 @@ static int nfs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
|
|||
nfs_free_fhandle(fhandle);
|
||||
nfs4_label_free(label);
|
||||
|
||||
/* set a readdirplus hint that we had a cache miss */
|
||||
nfs_force_use_readdirplus(dir);
|
||||
|
||||
out_set_verifier:
|
||||
nfs_set_verifier(dentry, nfs_save_change_attribute(dir));
|
||||
out_valid:
|
||||
/* Success: notify readdir to use READDIRPLUS */
|
||||
nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(dir);
|
||||
out_valid_noent:
|
||||
if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
|
||||
if (parent != ACCESS_ONCE(dentry->d_parent))
|
||||
return -ECHILD;
|
||||
|
@ -1413,8 +1421,8 @@ struct dentry *nfs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry * dentry, unsigned in
|
|||
if (IS_ERR(res))
|
||||
goto out_label;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Success: notify readdir to use READDIRPLUS */
|
||||
nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(dir);
|
||||
/* Notify readdir to use READDIRPLUS */
|
||||
nfs_force_use_readdirplus(dir);
|
||||
|
||||
no_entry:
|
||||
res = d_splice_alias(inode, dentry);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue