net: ipv6: Remove redundant RTA_OIF in multipath routes
Dinesh reported that RTA_MULTIPATH nexthops are 8-bytes larger with IPv6
than IPv4. The recent refactoring for multipath support in netlink
messages does discriminate between non-multipath which needs the OIF
and multipath which adds a rtnexthop struct for each hop making the
RTA_OIF attribute redundant. Resolve by adding a flag to the info
function to skip the oif for multipath.
Fixes: beb1afac51
("net: ipv6: Add support to dump multipath routes
via RTA_MULTIPATH attribute")
Reported-by: Dinesh Dutt <ddutt@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
713c43b315
commit
5be083cedc
|
@ -3299,7 +3299,6 @@ static size_t rt6_nlmsg_size(struct rt6_info *rt)
|
|||
nexthop_len = nla_total_size(0) /* RTA_MULTIPATH */
|
||||
+ NLA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct rtnexthop))
|
||||
+ nla_total_size(16) /* RTA_GATEWAY */
|
||||
+ nla_total_size(4) /* RTA_OIF */
|
||||
+ lwtunnel_get_encap_size(rt->dst.lwtstate);
|
||||
|
||||
nexthop_len *= rt->rt6i_nsiblings;
|
||||
|
@ -3323,7 +3322,7 @@ static size_t rt6_nlmsg_size(struct rt6_info *rt)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int rt6_nexthop_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt,
|
||||
unsigned int *flags)
|
||||
unsigned int *flags, bool skip_oif)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!netif_running(rt->dst.dev) || !netif_carrier_ok(rt->dst.dev)) {
|
||||
*flags |= RTNH_F_LINKDOWN;
|
||||
|
@ -3336,7 +3335,8 @@ static int rt6_nexthop_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt,
|
|||
goto nla_put_failure;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (rt->dst.dev &&
|
||||
/* not needed for multipath encoding b/c it has a rtnexthop struct */
|
||||
if (!skip_oif && rt->dst.dev &&
|
||||
nla_put_u32(skb, RTA_OIF, rt->dst.dev->ifindex))
|
||||
goto nla_put_failure;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3350,6 +3350,7 @@ nla_put_failure:
|
|||
return -EMSGSIZE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* add multipath next hop */
|
||||
static int rt6_add_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rtnexthop *rtnh;
|
||||
|
@ -3362,7 +3363,7 @@ static int rt6_add_nexthop(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt)
|
|||
rtnh->rtnh_hops = 0;
|
||||
rtnh->rtnh_ifindex = rt->dst.dev ? rt->dst.dev->ifindex : 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (rt6_nexthop_info(skb, rt, &flags) < 0)
|
||||
if (rt6_nexthop_info(skb, rt, &flags, true) < 0)
|
||||
goto nla_put_failure;
|
||||
|
||||
rtnh->rtnh_flags = flags;
|
||||
|
@ -3515,7 +3516,7 @@ static int rt6_fill_node(struct net *net,
|
|||
|
||||
nla_nest_end(skb, mp);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (rt6_nexthop_info(skb, rt, &rtm->rtm_flags) < 0)
|
||||
if (rt6_nexthop_info(skb, rt, &rtm->rtm_flags, false) < 0)
|
||||
goto nla_put_failure;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue