hollalinux
/
linux-sg2042
mirror of https://github.com/sophgo/linux-riscv.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[PATCH] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic 

The condition for no context in do_exception checks for hard and soft
interrupts by using in_interrupt() but not for preemption.  This is bad for
the users of __copy_from/to_user_inatomic because the fault handler might call
schedule although the preemption count is != 0.  Use in_atomic() instead
in_interrupt().

Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Martin Schwidefsky 2005-06-04 15:43:32 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent c5c3a6d8fe
commit 595bf2aaca
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
arch/s390/mm/fault.c
View File

@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ do_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, int is_protection)
* we are not in an interrupt and that there is a
* user context.
*/
if (user_address == 0 || in_interrupt() || !mm)
if (user_address == 0 || in_atomic() || !mm)
goto no_context;
/*