drm/i915: work around warning in i915_gem_gtt

Gcc warns that addr might be used uninitialized. It may not, but I see
why gcc gets confused.

Additionally, hiding code with side-effects inside WARN_ON() argument
seems uncool, so I moved it outside.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
[danvet: Add obligatory /* shuts up gcc */ comment.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
Pavel Machek 2014-07-28 13:20:58 +02:00 committed by Daniel Vetter
parent 72b79c9b2f
commit 57007df74a
1 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@ static void gen8_ggtt_insert_entries(struct i915_address_space *vm,
(gen8_gtt_pte_t __iomem *)dev_priv->gtt.gsm + first_entry;
int i = 0;
struct sg_page_iter sg_iter;
dma_addr_t addr = 0;
dma_addr_t addr = 0; /* shut up gcc */
for_each_sg_page(st->sgl, &sg_iter, st->nents, 0) {
addr = sg_dma_address(sg_iter.sg) +
@ -1461,7 +1461,7 @@ static void gen6_ggtt_insert_entries(struct i915_address_space *vm,
(gen6_gtt_pte_t __iomem *)dev_priv->gtt.gsm + first_entry;
int i = 0;
struct sg_page_iter sg_iter;
dma_addr_t addr;
dma_addr_t addr = 0;
for_each_sg_page(st->sgl, &sg_iter, st->nents, 0) {
addr = sg_page_iter_dma_address(&sg_iter);
@ -1475,9 +1475,10 @@ static void gen6_ggtt_insert_entries(struct i915_address_space *vm,
* of NUMA access patterns. Therefore, even with the way we assume
* hardware should work, we must keep this posting read for paranoia.
*/
if (i != 0)
WARN_ON(readl(&gtt_entries[i-1]) !=
vm->pte_encode(addr, level, true, flags));
if (i != 0) {
unsigned long gtt = readl(&gtt_entries[i-1]);
WARN_ON(gtt != vm->pte_encode(addr, level, true, flags));
}
/* This next bit makes the above posting read even more important. We
* want to flush the TLBs only after we're certain all the PTE updates