locks: don't call locks_release_private from locks_copy_lock
All callers of locks_copy_lock pass in a brand new file_lock struct, so there's no need to call locks_release_private on it. Replace that with a warning that fires in the event that we receive a target lock that doesn't look like it's properly initialized. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8144f1f699
commit
566709bd62
|
@ -285,7 +285,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__locks_copy_lock);
|
|||
|
||||
void locks_copy_lock(struct file_lock *new, struct file_lock *fl)
|
||||
{
|
||||
locks_release_private(new);
|
||||
/* "new" must be a freshly-initialized lock */
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(new->fl_ops);
|
||||
|
||||
__locks_copy_lock(new, fl);
|
||||
new->fl_file = fl->fl_file;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue