gpio: pca953x: fix an incorrect lockdep warning
If an I2C GPIO multiplexer is driven by a GPIO provided by an expander when there's a second expander using the same device driver on one of the I2C bus segments, lockdep prints a deadlock warning when trying to set the direction or the value of the GPIOs provided by the second expander. The below diagram presents the setup: - - - - - ------- --------- Bus segment 1 | | | | | |--------------- Devices | | SCL/SDA | | | | | Linux |-----------| I2C MUX | - - - - - | | | | | Bus segment 2 | | | | |------------------- ------- | --------- | | | - - - - - ------------ | MUX GPIO | | | | | Devices | GPIO | | | | | Expander 1 |---- - - - - - | | | ------------ | SCL/SDA | ------------ | | | GPIO | | Expander 2 | | | ------------ The reason for lockdep warning is that we take the chip->i2c_lock in pca953x_gpio_set_value() or pca953x_gpio_direction_output() and then come right back to pca953x_gpio_set_value() when the GPIO mux kicks in. The locks actually protect different expanders, but for lockdep both are of the same class, so it says: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&chip->i2c_lock); lock(&chip->i2c_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation In order to get rid of the warning, retrieve the adapter nesting depth and use it as lockdep subclass for chip->i2c_lock. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2771dc34dd
commit
559b46990e
|
@ -786,6 +786,8 @@ static int pca953x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
|
|||
chip->chip_type = PCA_CHIP_TYPE(chip->driver_data);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_init(&chip->i2c_lock);
|
||||
lockdep_set_subclass(&chip->i2c_lock,
|
||||
i2c_adapter_depth(client->adapter));
|
||||
|
||||
/* initialize cached registers from their original values.
|
||||
* we can't share this chip with another i2c master.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue