KVM: arm64: Divorce the perf code from oprofile helpers

KVM/arm64 is the sole user of perf_num_counters(), and really
could do without it. Stop using the obsolete API by relying on
the existing probing code.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210414134409.1266357-2-maz@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
Marc Zyngier 2021-04-14 14:44:05 +01:00
parent 1e28eed176
commit 5421db1be3
3 changed files with 6 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -50,12 +50,7 @@ static struct perf_guest_info_callbacks kvm_guest_cbs = {
int kvm_perf_init(void)
{
/*
* Check if HW_PERF_EVENTS are supported by checking the number of
* hardware performance counters. This could ensure the presence of
* a physical PMU and CONFIG_PERF_EVENT is selected.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0)
if (kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver() != 0xf)
static_branch_enable(&kvm_arm_pmu_available);
return perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs);

View File

@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, select_idx);
}
static int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void)
int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void)
{
struct perf_event_attr attr = { };
struct perf_event *event;

View File

@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void);
#else
struct kvm_pmu {
};
@ -116,6 +117,9 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void) { return 0xf; }
#endif
#endif