KVM: arm64: Divorce the perf code from oprofile helpers
KVM/arm64 is the sole user of perf_num_counters(), and really could do without it. Stop using the obsolete API by relying on the existing probing code. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210414134409.1266357-2-maz@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e28eed176
commit
5421db1be3
|
@ -50,12 +50,7 @@ static struct perf_guest_info_callbacks kvm_guest_cbs = {
|
|||
|
||||
int kvm_perf_init(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check if HW_PERF_EVENTS are supported by checking the number of
|
||||
* hardware performance counters. This could ensure the presence of
|
||||
* a physical PMU and CONFIG_PERF_EVENT is selected.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0)
|
||||
if (kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver() != 0xf)
|
||||
static_branch_enable(&kvm_arm_pmu_available);
|
||||
|
||||
return perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
|
|||
kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, select_idx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void)
|
||||
int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct perf_event_attr attr = { };
|
||||
struct perf_event *event;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
|||
int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
||||
struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
|
||||
int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
|
||||
int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
struct kvm_pmu {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -116,6 +117,9 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1)
|
|||
{
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void) { return 0xf; }
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue