target: Fix task count > 1 handling breakage and use max_sector page alignment

This patch addresses recent breakage with multiple se_task (task_count > 1)
operation following backend dev->se_sub_dev->se_dev_attrib.max_sectors in new
transport_allocate_data_tasks() code.  The initial bug here was a bogus
task->task_sg_nents assignment in transport_allocate_data_tasks() based on
the passed parameter, which now uses DIV_ROUND_UP(task_size, PAGE_SIZE) to
determine the proper number of per task SGL entries for the (task_count > 1)
case.

This also means we now need to enforce a PAGE_SIZE aligned max_sector count
value for this to work as expected without bringing back the pre v3.1
transport_map_mem_to_sg() logic to handle SGL offsets across multiple tasks.
So this patch adds se_dev_align_max_sectors() to round down max_sectors as
necessary to ensure this alignment via se_dev_set_default_attribs() and
se_dev_align_max_sectors() and keeps it simple for (task_count > 1)
operation.

So far this bugfix has been tested with (task_count > 1) operation
using iscsi-target and iblock backends.

Reported-by: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
Cc: Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
This commit is contained in:
Nicholas Bellinger 2011-08-13 02:11:38 -07:00
parent 01cde4d543
commit 525a48a21d
2 changed files with 33 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -839,6 +839,24 @@ int se_dev_check_shutdown(struct se_device *dev)
return ret; return ret;
} }
u32 se_dev_align_max_sectors(u32 max_sectors, u32 block_size)
{
u32 tmp, aligned_max_sectors;
/*
* Limit max_sectors to a PAGE_SIZE aligned value for modern
* transport_allocate_data_tasks() operation.
*/
tmp = rounddown((max_sectors * block_size), PAGE_SIZE);
aligned_max_sectors = (tmp / block_size);
if (max_sectors != aligned_max_sectors) {
printk(KERN_INFO "Rounding down aligned max_sectors from %u"
" to %u\n", max_sectors, aligned_max_sectors);
return aligned_max_sectors;
}
return max_sectors;
}
void se_dev_set_default_attribs( void se_dev_set_default_attribs(
struct se_device *dev, struct se_device *dev,
struct se_dev_limits *dev_limits) struct se_dev_limits *dev_limits)
@ -878,6 +896,11 @@ void se_dev_set_default_attribs(
* max_sectors is based on subsystem plugin dependent requirements. * max_sectors is based on subsystem plugin dependent requirements.
*/ */
dev->se_sub_dev->se_dev_attrib.hw_max_sectors = limits->max_hw_sectors; dev->se_sub_dev->se_dev_attrib.hw_max_sectors = limits->max_hw_sectors;
/*
* Align max_sectors down to PAGE_SIZE to follow transport_allocate_data_tasks()
*/
limits->max_sectors = se_dev_align_max_sectors(limits->max_sectors,
limits->logical_block_size);
dev->se_sub_dev->se_dev_attrib.max_sectors = limits->max_sectors; dev->se_sub_dev->se_dev_attrib.max_sectors = limits->max_sectors;
/* /*
* Set optimal_sectors from max_sectors, which can be lowered via * Set optimal_sectors from max_sectors, which can be lowered via
@ -1242,6 +1265,11 @@ int se_dev_set_max_sectors(struct se_device *dev, u32 max_sectors)
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
} }
} }
/*
* Align max_sectors down to PAGE_SIZE to follow transport_allocate_data_tasks()
*/
max_sectors = se_dev_align_max_sectors(max_sectors,
dev->se_sub_dev->se_dev_attrib.block_size);
dev->se_sub_dev->se_dev_attrib.max_sectors = max_sectors; dev->se_sub_dev->se_dev_attrib.max_sectors = max_sectors;
pr_debug("dev[%p]: SE Device max_sectors changed to %u\n", pr_debug("dev[%p]: SE Device max_sectors changed to %u\n",

View File

@ -4126,7 +4126,11 @@ static int transport_allocate_data_tasks(
/* Update new cdb with updated lba/sectors */ /* Update new cdb with updated lba/sectors */
cmd->transport_split_cdb(task->task_lba, task->task_sectors, cdb); cmd->transport_split_cdb(task->task_lba, task->task_sectors, cdb);
/*
* This now assumes that passed sg_ents are in PAGE_SIZE chunks
* in order to calculate the number per task SGL entries
*/
task->task_sg_nents = DIV_ROUND_UP(task->task_size, PAGE_SIZE);
/* /*
* Check if the fabric module driver is requesting that all * Check if the fabric module driver is requesting that all
* struct se_task->task_sg[] be chained together.. If so, * struct se_task->task_sg[] be chained together.. If so,
@ -4136,7 +4140,6 @@ static int transport_allocate_data_tasks(
* It's so much easier and only a waste when task_count > 1. * It's so much easier and only a waste when task_count > 1.
* That is extremely rare. * That is extremely rare.
*/ */
task->task_sg_nents = sgl_nents;
if (cmd->se_tfo->task_sg_chaining) { if (cmd->se_tfo->task_sg_chaining) {
task->task_sg_nents++; task->task_sg_nents++;
task->task_padded_sg = 1; task->task_padded_sg = 1;