perf/x86/intel/rapl: Clean up the printk output
The output is inconsistent. Use a proper pr_fmt prefix and split out the advertisement into a seperate function. Remove the WARN_ON() in the failure case. It's pointless as we already know where it failed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160222221012.504551295@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
75c7003fbf
commit
512089d984
|
@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
|
|||
* the duration of the measurement. Tools may use a function such as
|
||||
* ldexp(raw_count, -32);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "RAPL PMU: " fmt
|
||||
|
||||
#include <linux/module.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/slab.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
|
||||
|
@ -144,7 +147,7 @@ static inline u64 rapl_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
|
|||
static inline u64 rapl_scale(u64 v, int cfg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (cfg > NR_RAPL_DOMAINS) {
|
||||
pr_warn("invalid domain %d, failed to scale data\n", cfg);
|
||||
pr_warn("Invalid domain %d, failed to scale data\n", cfg);
|
||||
return v;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -680,6 +683,21 @@ static int rapl_check_hw_unit(void (*quirk)(void))
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __init rapl_advertise(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
pr_info("API unit is 2^-32 Joules, %d fixed counters, %llu ms ovfl timer\n",
|
||||
hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask), rapl_timer_ms);
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < NR_RAPL_DOMAINS; i++) {
|
||||
if (rapl_cntr_mask & (1 << i)) {
|
||||
pr_info("hw unit of domain %s 2^-%d Joules\n",
|
||||
rapl_domain_names[i], rapl_hw_unit[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __init cleanup_rapl_pmus(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int cpu;
|
||||
|
@ -696,7 +714,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_cpu_match[] = {
|
|||
static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
void (*quirk)(void) = NULL;
|
||||
int cpu, ret, i;
|
||||
int cpu, ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* check for Intel processor family 6
|
||||
|
@ -751,30 +769,16 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = perf_pmu_register(&rapl_pmu_class, "power", -1);
|
||||
if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
|
||||
pr_info("RAPL PMU detected, registration failed (%d), RAPL PMU disabled\n", ret);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier);
|
||||
cpu_notifier_register_done();
|
||||
|
||||
pr_info("RAPL PMU detected,"
|
||||
" API unit is 2^-32 Joules,"
|
||||
" %d fixed counters"
|
||||
" %llu ms ovfl timer\n",
|
||||
hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask),
|
||||
rapl_timer_ms);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < NR_RAPL_DOMAINS; i++) {
|
||||
if (rapl_cntr_mask & (1 << i)) {
|
||||
pr_info("hw unit of domain %s 2^-%d Joules\n",
|
||||
rapl_domain_names[i], rapl_hw_unit[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rapl_advertise();
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
pr_warn("Initialization failed (%d), disabled\n", ret);
|
||||
cleanup_rapl_pmus();
|
||||
cpu_notifier_register_done();
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue