ax25: improve the incomplete fix to avoid UAF and NPD bugs
The previous commit 1ade48d0c2
("ax25: NPD bug when detaching
AX25 device") introduce lock_sock() into ax25_kill_by_device to
prevent NPD bug. But the concurrency NPD or UAF bug will occur,
when lock_sock() or release_sock() dereferences the ax25_cb->sock.
The NULL pointer dereference bug can be shown as below:
ax25_kill_by_device() | ax25_release()
| ax25_destroy_socket()
| ax25_cb_del()
... | ...
| ax25->sk=NULL;
lock_sock(s->sk); //(1) |
s->ax25_dev = NULL; | ...
release_sock(s->sk); //(2) |
... |
The root cause is that the sock is set to null before dereference
site (1) or (2). Therefore, this patch extracts the ax25_cb->sock
in advance, and uses ax25_list_lock to protect it, which can synchronize
with ax25_cb_del() and ensure the value of sock is not null before
dereference sites.
The concurrency UAF bug can be shown as below:
ax25_kill_by_device() | ax25_release()
| ax25_destroy_socket()
... | ...
| sock_put(sk); //FREE
lock_sock(s->sk); //(1) |
s->ax25_dev = NULL; | ...
release_sock(s->sk); //(2) |
... |
The root cause is that the sock is released before dereference
site (1) or (2). Therefore, this patch uses sock_hold() to increase
the refcount of sock and uses ax25_list_lock to protect it, which
can synchronize with ax25_cb_del() in ax25_destroy_socket() and
ensure the sock wil not be released before dereference sites.
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
928d6fe996
commit
4e0f718daf
|
@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev)
|
|||
{
|
||||
ax25_dev *ax25_dev;
|
||||
ax25_cb *s;
|
||||
struct sock *sk;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((ax25_dev = ax25_dev_ax25dev(dev)) == NULL)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
@ -85,13 +86,15 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev)
|
|||
again:
|
||||
ax25_for_each(s, &ax25_list) {
|
||||
if (s->ax25_dev == ax25_dev) {
|
||||
sk = s->sk;
|
||||
sock_hold(sk);
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
|
||||
lock_sock(s->sk);
|
||||
lock_sock(sk);
|
||||
s->ax25_dev = NULL;
|
||||
release_sock(s->sk);
|
||||
release_sock(sk);
|
||||
ax25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH);
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
sock_put(sk);
|
||||
/* The entry could have been deleted from the
|
||||
* list meanwhile and thus the next pointer is
|
||||
* no longer valid. Play it safe and restart
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue