perf, x86: Fix hw_perf_enable() event assignment
What happens is that we schedule badly like: <...>-1987 [019] 280.252808: x86_pmu_start: event-46/1300c0: idx: 0 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252811: x86_pmu_start: event-47/1300c0: idx: 1 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252812: x86_pmu_start: event-48/1300c0: idx: 2 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252813: x86_pmu_start: event-49/1300c0: idx: 3 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252814: x86_pmu_start: event-50/1300c0: idx: 32 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252825: x86_pmu_stop: event-46/1300c0: idx: 0 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252826: x86_pmu_stop: event-47/1300c0: idx: 1 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252827: x86_pmu_stop: event-48/1300c0: idx: 2 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252828: x86_pmu_stop: event-49/1300c0: idx: 3 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252829: x86_pmu_stop: event-50/1300c0: idx: 32 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252834: x86_pmu_start: event-47/1300c0: idx: 1 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252834: x86_pmu_start: event-48/1300c0: idx: 2 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252835: x86_pmu_start: event-49/1300c0: idx: 3 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252836: x86_pmu_start: event-50/1300c0: idx: 32 <...>-1987 [019] 280.252837: x86_pmu_start: event-51/1300c0: idx: 32 *FAIL* This happens because we only iterate the n_running events in the first pass, and reset their index to -1 if they don't match to force a re-assignment. Now, in our RR example, n_running == 0 because we fully unscheduled, so event-50 will retain its idx==32, even though in scheduling it will have gotten idx=0, and we don't trigger the re-assign path. The easiest way to fix this is the below patch, which simply validates the full assignment in the second pass. Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1268311069.5037.31.camel@laptop> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
85cfabbcd1
commit
45e16a6834
|
@ -811,7 +811,6 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
|
|||
* step2: reprogram moved events into new counters
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < n_running; i++) {
|
||||
|
||||
event = cpuc->event_list[i];
|
||||
hwc = &event->hw;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -826,21 +825,16 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
x86_pmu_stop(event);
|
||||
|
||||
hwc->idx = -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < cpuc->n_events; i++) {
|
||||
|
||||
event = cpuc->event_list[i];
|
||||
hwc = &event->hw;
|
||||
|
||||
if (i < n_running &&
|
||||
match_prev_assignment(hwc, cpuc, i))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (hwc->idx == -1)
|
||||
if (!match_prev_assignment(hwc, cpuc, i))
|
||||
x86_assign_hw_event(event, cpuc, i);
|
||||
else if (i < n_running)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
x86_pmu_start(event);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue