um: winch_interrupt() can happen inside of free_winch()
... so set winch->fd to -1 before doing free_irq(), to avoid having winch_interrupt() come from/during the latter and attempt to do reactivate_fd() on something that's already gone. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f71f94845e
commit
45cd5e2d4e
|
@ -725,6 +725,8 @@ struct winch {
|
|||
|
||||
static void free_winch(struct winch *winch, int free_irq_ok)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int fd = winch->fd;
|
||||
winch->fd = -1;
|
||||
if (free_irq_ok)
|
||||
free_irq(WINCH_IRQ, winch);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -732,8 +734,8 @@ static void free_winch(struct winch *winch, int free_irq_ok)
|
|||
|
||||
if (winch->pid != -1)
|
||||
os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
|
||||
if (winch->fd != -1)
|
||||
os_close_file(winch->fd);
|
||||
if (fd != -1)
|
||||
os_close_file(fd);
|
||||
if (winch->stack != 0)
|
||||
free_stack(winch->stack, 0);
|
||||
kfree(winch);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue