locking/rtmutex: Implement lockless top-waiter wakeup
Mark the task for later wakeup after the wait_lock has been released. This way, once the next task is awoken, it will have a better chance to of finding the wait_lock free when continuing executing in __rt_mutex_slowlock() when trying to acquire the rtmutex, calling try_to_take_rt_mutex(). Upon contended scenarios, other tasks attempting take the lock may acquire it first, right after the wait_lock is released, but (a) this can also occur with the current code, as it relies on the spinlock fairness, and (b) we are dealing with the top-waiter anyway, so it will always take the lock next. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1432056298-18738-2-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6f9aad0bc3
commit
45ab4effc3
|
@ -955,14 +955,13 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Wake up the next waiter on the lock.
|
|
||||||
*
|
|
||||||
* Remove the top waiter from the current tasks pi waiter list and
|
* Remove the top waiter from the current tasks pi waiter list and
|
||||||
* wake it up.
|
* queue it up.
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* Called with lock->wait_lock held.
|
* Called with lock->wait_lock held.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
static void wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q,
|
||||||
|
struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
|
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
|
||||||
unsigned long flags;
|
unsigned long flags;
|
||||||
|
@ -991,12 +990,7 @@ static void wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task);
|
||||||
* It's safe to dereference waiter as it cannot go away as
|
|
||||||
* long as we hold lock->wait_lock. The waiter task needs to
|
|
||||||
* acquire it in order to dequeue the waiter.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
|
@ -1258,6 +1252,8 @@ static inline int rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
||||||
static void __sched
|
static void __sched
|
||||||
rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
WAKE_Q(wake_q);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock);
|
debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock);
|
||||||
|
@ -1306,10 +1302,13 @@ rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* The wakeup next waiter path does not suffer from the above
|
* The wakeup next waiter path does not suffer from the above
|
||||||
* race. See the comments there.
|
* race. See the comments there.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Queue the next waiter for wakeup once we release the wait_lock.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
wakeup_next_waiter(lock);
|
mark_wakeup_next_waiter(&wake_q, lock);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||||
|
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Undo pi boosting if necessary: */
|
/* Undo pi boosting if necessary: */
|
||||||
rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
|
rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue