Btrfs: fix an integer overflow check
This isn't super serious because you need CAP_ADMIN to run this code.
I added this integer overflow check last year but apparently I am
rubbish at writing integer overflow checks... There are two issues.
First, access_ok() works on unsigned long type and not u64 so on 32 bit
systems the access_ok() could be checking a truncated size. The other
issue is that we should be using a stricter limit so we don't overflow
the kzalloc() setting ctx->clone_roots later in the function after the
access_ok():
alloc_size = sizeof(struct clone_root) * (arg->clone_sources_count + 1);
sctx->clone_roots = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
Fixes: f5ecec3ce2
("btrfs: send: silence an integer overflow warning")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ added comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ce0dcee626
commit
457ae7268b
|
@ -6305,8 +6305,13 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, void __user *arg_)
|
|||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check that we don't overflow at later allocations, we request
|
||||
* clone_sources_count + 1 items, and compare to unsigned long inside
|
||||
* access_ok.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (arg->clone_sources_count >
|
||||
ULLONG_MAX / sizeof(*arg->clone_sources)) {
|
||||
ULONG_MAX / sizeof(struct clone_root) - 1) {
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue